Nov 26, 2019, 9:32 AM
- String Theory
- Loop Quantum Gravity
- Asymptotically Safe Gravity
- Causal Dynamical Triangulations and
- Emergent gravity
They have no fking idea really.
Nov 26, 2019, 9:32 AM
They have no fking idea really.
Nov 26, 2019, 9:32 AM
They have no fking idea really.
Via Aristotle’s Metaphysical Model https://t.co/6BViiNrjwD
Via Aristotle’s Metaphysical Model https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/30/via-aristotles-metaphysical-model/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-30 22:18:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266856458412593152
Nov 30, 2019, 3:26 PM by Andrew M Gilmour I’m not sure this will be of any use to you but I expanded Aristotle’s metaphysical model to help myself understand them. In keeping with truth equals that which exists, and each layer being predicated on the previous one; I came up with this model: Empirical and Analytical: 1. Ontic (4 categories of existence) 2. Epistemic (perceiving, awareness of) 3. Semiotic(?) (methodology, language is the first method, but includes everything in standard epistemology not included in the epistemic category) 4. Semantic 5. Ethic (CD: “Supply”, Masculine ) Leftists uses the mirror opposite model. Social and verbal (social constructivism): 1. Ethic (X is good, I like X) 2. Semantic (all definitions are defined how I value them) 3. Semiotic (all methods are arbitrary) 4. Epistemic (perception and awareness come after: feelings, definitions, and methods) They are not aware of anything that hasn’t passed through the first 3 levels. 5. Ontic (only after this completely backward process can a thing be said to exist) (CD: “Demand”, Feminine ) This seems to be the operational structure behind these two modes of being. Unfailingly when I read a leftist argument, I find the methodology procedes from the ethic or (false) definition. They’ve always used this model, only now it has a name.
No Evolution Is Not Random It’s Just Undirected https://t.co/9MwITMtgVY
No Evolution Is Not Random It’s Just Undirected https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/30/no-evolution-is-not-random-its-just-undirected/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-30 22:14:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266855580540510210
Dec 2, 2019, 10:32 AM Evolution is not random. Evolution increases in complexity in order to exploit niches of caloric and therefore reproductive opportunity. In humans, and all domesticated animals, evolution consists of increasing cerebral volume, and slowing rate and depth of sexual development, making possible executive function (self-control) and rational agency. (choice). The east asians are the most developed. Whites less so, indians less so, middle easterners less so, and each of the three major african groups less so. With class size exacerbating (limiting) the distribution of domestication. The only contrary argument is that executive function (reason and agency) upon which all human achievement is constructed, is not evolutionary. We could make the argument that we are self domesticating and that this is an evolution of evolution itself, and that we are evolving the world in favor of self domesticating creatures. or we could make the argument that reason and agency and domestication is not evolutionary – but that is difficult to imagine, since once reason exists, and science exists, man has control over his evolution, and as far as we can tell, he seeks superior physical and mental fitness, and superior physical symmetry.
Dec 2, 2019, 10:32 AM Evolution is not random. Evolution increases in complexity in order to exploit niches of caloric and therefore reproductive opportunity. In humans, and all domesticated animals, evolution consists of increasing cerebral volume, and slowing rate and depth of sexual development, making possible executive function (self-control) and rational agency. (choice). The east asians are the most developed. Whites less so, indians less so, middle easterners less so, and each of the three major african groups less so. With class size exacerbating (limiting) the distribution of domestication. The only contrary argument is that executive function (reason and agency) upon which all human achievement is constructed, is not evolutionary. We could make the argument that we are self domesticating and that this is an evolution of evolution itself, and that we are evolving the world in favor of self domesticating creatures. or we could make the argument that reason and agency and domestication is not evolutionary – but that is difficult to imagine, since once reason exists, and science exists, man has control over his evolution, and as far as we can tell, he seeks superior physical and mental fitness, and superior physical symmetry.
Why Is There Oil in The Middle East? (lessons) https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/30/why-is-there-oil-in-the-middle-east-lessons-2/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-30 16:37:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266770686313476100