Curt Doolittle

Category: Religion, Myth, and Theology

  • The Oath of Transcendent Man

    A PAGAN(HEATHEN), A CHRISTIAN, AN ARYAN, A WARRIOR, A MAN TRANSCENDENT

    A religion of man, nature, and nature’s god need contain no lies, no false promises, no sophistry, nothing supernatural, and survives by the sheer ‘wonder’ of the universe that we are born to master, transform, and rule. [I] am a Heathen if 1) I accept the laws of nature as binding on all of existence; and 2) if I treat nature as sacred and to be contemplated, protected and improved; and 3) I treat the world as something to transform closer to an Eden in whatever ways I can before I die; and 4) if I deny the existence of a supreme being with dominion over the physical laws, and treat all gods, demigods, heroes, saints, figures of history, and ancestors as characters with whom I may speak to in private contemplation in the hope of gaining wisdom and synchronicity from having done so. And 5) if I participate with others of my society in repetition of oaths, repetition of myths, repetition of festivals, repetition of holidays, and the perpetuation of all of the above to my offspring. And 6) if I leave open that synchronicity appears to exist now and then, and that it may be possible that there is a scientific explanation for it, other than just humans subject to similar stimuli producing similar intuitions and therefore similar ends. As far as I know this is all that is required of me to be a Heathen. [I] am a Christian if I have adopted the teaching of christianity: 1) the eradication of hatred from the human heart. 2) the extension of kinship love to non-kin. 3) the demand for personal acts of charity and personal cost, 4) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war. As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Christian. [I] am an Aryan if 1) I proudly display my excellences so that others seek to achieve or exceed them; 2) I seek competition to constantly test and improve myself so I do not weaken; 3) I swear to speak no insult and demand it; 4) I speak the truth and demand it; 5) I take nothing not paid for and demand it; 6) I grant sovereignty to my kin and demand it; 7) I insure my people regardless of condition, and demand it; and in doing so leave nothing but voluntary markets of cooperation between sovereign men; and to discipline, enserf, enslave, ostracize or kill those who do otherwise; 8) to not show fear or cowardice, abandon my brothers, or retreat, and 9) to die a good death in the service of my kin, my clan, my tribe and my people. As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be an Aryan. [I] am a Warrior in that 1) we will prepare for war so perfectly that none dare enter it against us. 2) Once we go to war, we do so with joy, with eagerness, and with passion, and without mercy, without constraint, and without remorse; And 3) before ending war, we shall defeat an enemy completely such that no other dares a condition of our enemy, and the memory of the slaughter lives a hundred generations. As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Warrior. [A]s far as I know, if I succeed as a Heathen, as a Christian, as an Aryan, as a Warrior, then I have transcended the animal man, and earned my place among the saints, heroes, demigods, gods, in the memories, histories, and legends of man. And that is the objective of heroes, demigods, and gods. We leave the rest for ordinary men. And so I swear to my fathers and brothers, and to my mothers and sisters, and to all our people, back to the beginning, that I shall transcend myself and mankind, into the gods we seek, by demand for the virtues of excellence and beauty, heroism and duty, sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and promise, warranty and insurance, and judge and jury from all others; and I shall grant the same to any who consent; and shall protect the interest of those who came before us, those of us living, and those of us yet to come, by force of law, prosecution, restitution, punishment, or death of those who resist. Curt Doolittle The Cult of Sovereignty The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Natural Law of Reciprocity The Propertarian Institute, Kiev, Ukraine

  • DOES WESTER MAN’S BIBLE JUSTICE

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aofPdMbXzUQHE DOES WESTER MAN’S BIBLE JUSTICE

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aofPdMbXzUQ

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-06 16:56:00 UTC

  • Christianity worked against aristocracy using the Israel/Christ myth, and supern

    Christianity worked against aristocracy using the Israel/Christ myth, and supernatural promise after death, and they think they can repeat the last victory with the colonialism/holocaust myth, pseudoscience (marx) and sophism(postmodernism and feminism). We can’t let them win.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-05 18:14:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1081614862835466246

    Reply addressees: @I_Vae_Victis_I @LanaLokteff

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1081593436027932672

    IN REPLY TO:

    @I_Vae_Victis_I

    The “hate speech” rubber stamp is the 21st century digital “There be dragons!”

    In other words- Truth telling (what gave us W. Civ. & Commons) is bad news for the temp. nomadic faux aristocrats.

    @curtdoolittle @LanaLokteff

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1081593436027932672

  • Expanding worldwide demand for stoicism. abrahamism done as political religion.

    Expanding worldwide demand for stoicism. abrahamism done as political religion. only buddhists and stoics solved mindfulness. only stoics without mysticism. iterative self authoring of goals and virtues substitute for ritual. But personal responsibility for it harder than public.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-01 20:58:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1080206565066657797

    Reply addressees: @jonathanwilson @tferriss

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1080200923014725632

    IN REPLY TO:

    @jonathanwilson

    @curtdoolittle Very similar, yes! I’d love some examples you can think of where Agile’s manifesto sounds like Seneca. @tferriss will be interested in this thread.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1080200923014725632

  • omfg. claire. your argument is this: people are stupid and need something stupid

    omfg. claire. your argument is this: people are stupid and need something stupid, and claire is stupid, and claire can understand islam, so therefore all stupid people should follow islam. that’s your argument. That’s the TOTALITY of it. Stop wasting my time with your insanity.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-29 16:12:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1079047449778499585

    Reply addressees: @Theocracy4all @r_rartin

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1079044693588103172

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1079044693588103172

  • The oldest gods and priests (vanir-feminine) The invading gods and warriors ( ae

    The oldest gods and priests (vanir-feminine)

    The invading gods and warriors ( aesir-masculine)

    The ascent of men into gods. (odin)

    The the survival of the invading gods (zeus pater)

    The expansion of the families (polities) (pantheons)

    The reassertion of zeus pater (sol invictus).

    The Holocaust Against Aristocracy by Jews, Christians, and Muslims

    The Restoration is still in progress.

    Gods, Demigods, Heroes, Men.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-29 10:06:00 UTC

  • SACRED INVERSION There have been things in the world properly made sacred by inv

    SACRED INVERSION

    There have been things in the world properly made sacred by inversion; we’re doing our damnedest to reverse the sanctity of these things by making them “normal” once again.

    Jonathan Pageau gives a wonderful presentation on the perversion of “modern” art. He speaks to the world “turning upside down.” I see this as the world turning from sacred back to merely ordinary. 🙁 [The reversal of a necessary and brilliant upending]

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUcdDfmjoTQ.

    Humans have a nature and thus bring a “collective subjectivity” to the value judgement of artistic endeavors. In other words it’s not “simply” subjective.

    By: G.K. Chesterton:

    “The family may fairly be considered, one would think, an ultimate human institution. Every one would admit that it has been the main cell and central unit of almost all societies hitherto, except, indeed, such societies as that of Lacedaemon, which went in for “efficiency,” and has, therefore, perished, and left not a trace behind. Christianity, even enormous as was its revolution, did not alter this ancient and savage sanctity; it merely reversed it. It did not deny the trinity of father, mother, and child. It merely read it backwards, making it run child, mother, father. This it called, not the family, but the Holy Family, for many things are made holy by being turned upside down. But some sages of our own decadence have made a serious attack on the family. They have impugned it, as I think wrongly; and its defenders have defended it, and defended it wrongly. The common defence of the family is that, amid the stress and fickleness of life, it is peaceful, pleasant, and at one. But there is another defence of the family which is possible, and to me evident; this defence is that the family is not peaceful and not pleasant and not at one.”

    Scott Adams, whom I have a great respect for misses the mark in his most controversial (and that’s saying a lot figuring most of his positions support Trump in some manner or another) video yet; the problem of the nuclear family.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyVK_T9m5R0

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-29 08:47:00 UTC

  • Technically ‘pagan’ is the name of a christian criticism of heathens the way mar

    Technically ‘pagan’ is the name of a christian criticism of heathens the way marxists used capitalism to criticize the middle class. Heathen means, as far as I can tell, ‘religion of the hearth’, or more correctly ‘folk religion’, or ‘natural religion’. Whereas mono = unnatural.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-29 00:42:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1078813553094729729

    Reply addressees: @alynpost

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1078812244366876672

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1078812244366876672

  • “What led you to replace Pagan with Heathen in this oath?”— A Friend Technical

    —“What led you to replace Pagan with Heathen in this oath?”— A Friend

    Technically ‘pagan’ is the name of a christian criticism of heathens the way marxists used capitalism to criticize the middle class. Heathen means, as far as I can tell, ‘religion of the hearth’, or more correctly ‘folk religion’, or ‘natural religion’. Whereas monotheism = political religion = unnatural.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-28 19:48:00 UTC

  • Abrahamism in Its Current State

    ABRAHAMISM IN ITS CURRENT STATE December 28th, 2018 8:49 AM [A]brahamism consists of the continuous advancement of the female means of conflict and war: undermining, deceit, and exhaustive relentless diligence in seizing every opportunity to do so. It is the ‘gatherer’ and ‘herd’ strategy of continuous harm. Men tend not to do this, in-group. Instead men use threats of violence and organized violence. CORE POSTS

    1. THE GRAMMARS OF TRUTH AND DECEIT
      (worth repeating)

    … 7) |TRUTHFUL GRAMMARS OF EXPRESSION| Math, Logic, Science, Operations(protocols, processes, recipes), Economics (money, banking, finance, accounting), Law (Natural), History, Literature (including poetry > essay > fiction > mythology). 8) |DECEIT| failure of due diligence > ignorance > error > bias > wishful thinking > loading > framing > suggestion > obscurantism > fictionalism > denialism > and deceit.9) |FICTIONALISMS| Deceit > Sophism > Pseudoscience > Supernaturalism.10) |AVOIDANCE| Disapproval > shaming > moralizing > psychologizing > ridicule >rallying > gossiping > undermining > and reputation-destruction. “DSRRGUR”.11) |ABRAHAMIC GRAMMARS|: Disapproval as substitute for argument > False Promise > Pilpul (sophism) > Critique () > Heaping of Undue Praise, Straw Man Criticism as a Vehicle for Disapproval > Reputation Destruction > Failure to Supply a Competing alternative capable of surviving same criticisms > Authoritarian Conformity,12) |ABRAHAMIC EVOLUTION| Abrahamism > (Adding Platonism) > Judaism > Christianity > Islam > (Dark Age Theology) > Marxism > Postmodernism > Feminism > Denialism: “APMPFD”.13) |LONG CYCLE OF HISTORY| {MALE EVOLUTIONARY TERRITORIAL: Fast Scientific Western > Medium Rational Eastern > Slow Narrative Indian Indian} vs FEMALE DEVOLUTIONARY MIGRATORY: Supernatural Semitic counter-evolutionary strategy. With Africa, Americas and Pacifica Lagging, and (it appears) Australian-NZ regressing.

     
    1. WHY? THE EVOLUTION OF THE ART OF LYING:

    Abrahamism v1: Judaism against Babylon’s Aristocracy Abrahamism v2: Christianity against Western Aristocracy. Abrahamism v3: Islam against the ancient world’s Aristocracy Abrahamism v4: Marxism against the modern world’s Aristocracy. Abrahamism v5: French Postmodernism against the current world’s Aristocracy. Abrahamism v6: Islamism against the entire world’s Aristocracy.

    3. Abrahamism is a Grammar of Devolutionary Deceit

    The Revolt Against The Invention of Truth Duty Aristocracy Meritocracy And Eugenic Evolution. Abrahamism = …. Pilpul(positiva) + Critique(negativa) = (undermining, loading, framing, overloading, suggestion, obscurantism, propagandism, fictionalisms) = ….. …. Gossip (undermining) = …. …. …. Female Group Strategy of Undermining Alphas = …. …. …. …. Female reproductive strategy of advancing her high-investment offspring regardless of merit = …. …. …. …. …. Dysgenic Parasitism.

    4. The Definition of Abrahamism in Natural Law

    In our Glossary of Natural Law “Abrahamism” refers to the argumentative technique of using Pilpul (via-positiva), and Critique (via-negativa) to construct sophisms (the argumentative equivalent of numerology and astrology) via use of loading, framing, suggestion, obscurantism, overloading, the Fictionalisms, appeals to reasonableness, and false promise, to create hazards. All three Abrahamic Religions, Kantian philosophy, Marxist argument, and Postmodern thought all make use of this technique of argument, often stated as “Dialectic” but operationally consisting of Pilpul vs Critique. ( If you cast this term as ‘racist’ or ‘hate speech’ you’re just either ignorant or a liar or both: a bad person. ) Most of Propertarianism (the Natural Law of Reciprocity) consists of attempts to prevent Abrahamic arguments and replace them with Testimonial (Ratio-Scientific-and-Operational) arguments so that Law (Constitutions) can be constructed strictly and logically and is not open to accidental, intentional, misinterpretation. Thus requiring legislatures reform a law rather than allow legislation from the Jurist’s bench – which is the means by which the US Constitution was undermined. My work consists of the suppression of deception (parasitism) by rhetorical means. Only liars and thieves would seek to suppress it.

    1. More Properties of Abrahamism 

    ABRAHAMISM: 1) Restatement of Myth as History 2) Projection of Traditional Wisdom as Authoritarian Law 3) Dependence upon Supernaturalism (“Magic”, “Miracle”) 4) Monopoly (exclusivity) and threat of loss for non compliance. 5) False Promise of Impossible(supernatural, natural) Reward for Compliance. 6) Use of Pilpul and Critique In Defense of the falsehoods. 7) Castes of Priests with status, power, and economic incentives to perpetuate the falsehoods. 8) Secret Knowledge, or Prohibition on Competing Knowledge, or Denial of contradictory knowledge. 9) Oath to a falsehood. Payment of Ritualistic costs to the falsehood. Payment of ‘donations’ (fees) to the priesthood. (Abrahamism, like Sovereignty, via-negativa Truth, The Grammars, and Natural Law are questions that will always require larger answers than people can easily absorb.)

    GETTING ANSWERS TO SUCH QUESTIONS – You can search my FB timeline by ‘curt doolittle abrahamism’. ( @[11019687:2048:Brandon Hayes] also keeps a long threads of related posts by all of us. I don’t think he keeps a ‘FB note’ listing those long posts as an index to his topic-posts, but if he does that would be a big help to people)

    • You can search the web site (it uses ElasticSearch now) by just entering ‘abrahamism’. My site is up to date through September first. I tend to update it once a quarter. Although I have gotten behind a number of times.

    WORK METHODOLOGY The way I work is by relating ideas across the spectrum in a series of shorter arguments – because I ‘whittle away’ at the stone so to speak, turning it to view it from different angles, working to gradually expose the figure (truth) below. I try to produce operational definitions in series, and to describe behavior as supply and demand using those series of definitions. Then I attempt to turn the fundamental insight into one or more aphorisms (summaries). Then to create a narrative that explains the topic and its applications. Then to weave these narratives together using the same constant language – this editing is what exhausts me and is why it takes me so long to produce a work. WORKFLOW I work from an outline of the complete scope of human thought. I work through the outline from metaphysics to group competitive strategy. Then I work with (many) sketches on FB. I move most of them to the web site. Then I collect the best of them into what I call ‘short courses’ or collections of posts. Then I take those ‘short courses’ and put them into the book. Then edit it all into an explanation. That’s my workflow. It’s actually painfully methodical. It just doesn’t look like it to the casual observer, because most people are desirous of rushing to judgment whereas i tend to exhaust a topic completely (very) before adding it to the canon. Then refine the network of concepts added to the canon once there. cheers.