Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • I Am Trying To Repair The Enlightenment

    [C]OMPARISONS:
    1) Ashkenazi Separatist Pseudoscientific (belief) Libertinism
    vs European Universalist Empirical (Legal) Libertarianism.

    2) Ashkenazi Neo Conservatism (Make the world safe for separatists)
    vs Anglo Burkeian Conservatism ( Parent the world into prosperity).

    3) Ashkenazi (Pseudo-scientific/Pseudo-moral) Communism
    vs Anglo-German (pseudo-scientific/Pseudo-moral) Secular Humanism.

    METHODS:
    1) Anglo American (critical) Empirical (Law).
    2) German (justificationary) Rationalism (Philosophy).
    3) French (subjectivist) Moralism (literature).
    3) Ashkenazi (overloading) pseudo-moralism, pseudo-scientism, pseudo-rationalism (Pseudoscience)

    All cultures tried to universalize their sectarian ideologies as rational and scientific platforms. Yet these different group evolutionary strategies all failed the test of universalism. The anglos were right in method (science) and wrong in vision of man (aristocracy of everyone). The germans were wrong in method (kantian rationalism) and right in vision of man (paternal hierarchy).

    The Ashkenazis were at best hermeneutic, and at worst deceitful (separatism without paying costs of commons) and pragmatic by creating a new ‘religion’ – a new means of suggestion by loading,framing and overloading; thereby taking advantage of western high trust and pathological altruism.

    Through this rather broader lens, we see that all the enlightenments failed. (I don’t address the french because no one takes them seriously). We see that the last century was plagued by lies, pseudoscience, pseudo-rationalism, and justification, and as Hayek warned us, was a century of mysticism (which was the best word he could come up with at the time.)

    That is why I am aggressively anti-ancap: because I see it as another great lie that has been propagandized upon my people, and has misdirected their energies and aspirations away from the only possible source of liberty: the prohibition on parasitism, the common law, universal standing, every man a sheriff, and universal militia. There is no state and no ruler if we rule by law.

    So where the person looking at leaves sees minor errors in the ancap-libertines, and where the person looking at trees sees a set of competing ideologies, I look at the forest and see group evolutionary strategies covering a spectrum from anglo empirical and legal ‘truth’, to german justification (kant and the german idealists), to french pretense of reason(Rousseau), to ashkenazi systemic deception: Freud, Boaz, Marx, Cantor, Mises, Frankfurt-School, Rothbard. The second great deception (authoritarian pseudoscience) duplicating what was done to rome by abraham, jesus, peter and paul: the first great deception: authoritarian monotheism.

    That explains why I am hostile to well intentioned fools.

    Because they’re part of the problem: useful idiots of the libertine rather than communist and neo-conservative types.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Propertarian Institute
    Kiev, Ukraine.

  • I AM TRYING TO REPAIR THE ENLIGHTENMENT COMPARISONS: 1) Ashkenazi Separatist Pse

    I AM TRYING TO REPAIR THE ENLIGHTENMENT

    COMPARISONS:

    1) Ashkenazi Separatist Pseudoscientific (belief) Libertinism

    vs European Universalists Empirical (Legal) Libertarianism.

    2) Ashkenazi Neo Conservatism (Make the world safe for separatists)

    vs Anglo Burkeian Conservatism ( Parent the world into prosperity).

    3) Ashkenazi (Pseudo-scientific/Pseudo-moral) Communism

    vs Anglo-German (pseudo-scientific/Pseudo-moral) Secular Humanism.

    METHODS:

    1) Anglo American (critical) Empirical (Law).

    2) German (justificationary) Rationalism (Philosophy).

    3) French (subjectivist) Moralism (literature).

    3) Ashkenazi (overloading) pseudo-moralism, pseudo-scientism, pseudo-rationalism (Pseudoscience)

    All cultures tried to universalize their sectarian ideologies as rational and scientific platforms. Yet these different group evolutionary strategies all failed the test of universalism. The anglos were right in method (science) and wrong in vision of man (aristocracy of everyone). The germans were wrong in method (kantian rationalism) and right in vision of man (paternal hierarchy).

    The Ashkenazis were at best hermeneutic, and at worst deceitful (separatism without paying costs of commons) and pragmatic by creating a new ‘religion’ – a new means of suggestion by loading,framing and overloading; thereby taking advantage of western high trust and pathological altruism.

    Through this rather broader lens, we see that all the enlightenments failed. (I don’t address the french because no one takes them seriously). We see that the last century was plagued by lies, pseudoscience, pseudo-rationalism, and justification, and as Hayek warned us, was a century of mysticism (which was the best word he could come up with at the time.)

    That is why I am aggressively anti-ancap: because I see it as another great lie that has been propagandized upon my people, and has misdirected their energies and aspirations away from the only possible source of liberty: the prohibition on parasitism, the common law, universal standing, every man a sheriff, and universal militia. There is no state and no ruler if we rule by law.

    So where the person looking at leaves sees minor errors in the ancap-libertines, and where the person looking at trees sees a set of competing ideologies, I look at the forest and see group evolutionary strategies covering a spectrum from anglo empirical and legal ‘truth’, to german justification (kant and the german idealists), to french pretense of reason(Rousseau), to ashkenazi systemic deception: Freud, Boaz, Marx, Cantor, Mises, Frankfurt-School, Rothbard. The second great deception (authoritarian pseudoscience) duplicating what was done to rome by abraham, jesus, peter and paul: the first great deception: authoritarian monotheism.

    That explains why I am hostile to well intentioned fools.

    Because they’re part of the problem: useful idiots of the libertine rather than communist and neo-conservative types.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-09-03 08:04:00 UTC

  • LIBERTARIAN IMPLOSION (frontpage mag) Few Republican subgroups were harder hit b

    http://www.frontpagemag.com/sites/default/files/styles/article_full/public/uploads/2015/08/23_ridiculously_offensive_donald_trump_quotes_4060_5187.jpg?itok=fZE6RSDMTHE LIBERTARIAN IMPLOSION

    (frontpage mag)

    Few Republican subgroups were harder hit by the rise of Trump than libertarians. Not that long ago, the libertarian message had appeared to be equivalent to conservatism. But while small government and deregulation were appealing, the libertarian foreign policy agenda was a disaster. Their romance with the Russian agents of Wikileaks and Edward Snowden didn’t help matters any. Libertarians got Republicans to cheer for Rand Paul’s drone filibuster, but ranting about drones and the NSA stopped being a viable foreign policy when ISIS began releasing beheading videos.

    But the real problems were domestic.

    A genuine deregulation focus might have redeemed Congress, but instead it led to inside baseball battles, like the one over the Export-Import Bank which were quite significant to the donor class, but weren’t of much interest to the Republican base.

    The capper came when the Koch Bros and Norquist allied with Obama and the left to back a pro-crime agenda. Just as Americans became worried by rising crime, libertarians began campaigning on behalf of drug dealers.

    And they’re still at it.

    Non-ideological candidates like Trump and Carson stepped into an intellectual vacuum created when libertarians imploded and took chunk of the conservative movement with them.

    The split predated Trump. Few conservatives were enthusiastic about amnesty. Trump picked up an issue that had already become a wedge when Cruz and Walker embraced it, setting them against establishment types like Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio, but also hard core libertarians like Rand Paul, and Koch cronies like Paul Ryan and Rick Perry.

    Trump just expanded the split into a larger protectionist position that has libertarians impotently fuming. He picked up chunks of Perot’s message and picked up a Republican base that felt abandoned.

    The conservative collapse also killed the ideological purity test. But then the purity test had already stopped making sense. Libertarians are currently advocating for drug dealers and illegal alien amnesty. Some are pushing straightforward transnationalism and not on Reason, but in more mainstream conservative outlets. They define this as a “Liberty” agenda, but its appeal is extremely limited at best.

    And if ideological purity means drug dealers, illegal aliens and more jobs going to China, plenty of conservatives have decided they don’t want any part of it.

    Libertarians had their hour, but their embrace of dubious causes made them irrelevant. The movement needs to think hard about how to reengage conservatives again. But there’s no sign of that. Instead it’s pursuing its alliance with the left in support of freeing drug dealers… a program that has no possible positive outcome either for America or for them.

    If the libertarian movement is to reemerge, it needs to take a cue from Trump by thinking about what Americans want rather than about the tenets of their ideology. Because if Trump is successful, they are going to end up buried in the rubble.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-09-03 05:02:00 UTC

  • Revolution: The Plan

    [W]estern Man is moral man, and moral men need: 1 – A Moral Justification for the application of Violence to institute change. (They are being lied to, and stolen from, and conquered systematically, and I explain how, why, and how to stop it.) (Ideologies require promise of actionable results within the current lifetime.)

    2 – A Solution to Demand: a set of institutional changes (concentration of effort) (an expansion of the classical liberal legal order to suppress lying, wishful thinking, bias and error in matters of the political commons; and a reconstruction of the houses of government as a market for the voluntary construction of commons.) 3 – A means of transition from one order to another. (An ordered means of rapid transformation within the status quo.) 4 – A set of tactics for raising the cost of the status quo: insurrection via: nullification (gradual disempowerment and transition to new government), secession(construction of a new government retaining the previous competitor), revolution (replacement of the people in government and modification of institutions eliminating the previous competitor) and civil war (destruction of the government and replacement with an entirely new one, eliminating the previous competitors). 5 – A set of leaders (speakers) to rally action. (I need 100 people. That’s all. I need only twelve who are very good.) Propertarianism and Testimonialism will be a more complete framework than has been produced before, even if we take into account all of Locke,Hume,Smith and Jefferson as a set. And if I fail, then the work sits in books and records until someone decides to use it or create something better. But I will have my good service. One leads a horse to water, but cannot make it drink. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine
  • Revolution: The Plan

    [W]estern Man is moral man, and moral men need: 1 – A Moral Justification for the application of Violence to institute change. (They are being lied to, and stolen from, and conquered systematically, and I explain how, why, and how to stop it.) (Ideologies require promise of actionable results within the current lifetime.)

    2 – A Solution to Demand: a set of institutional changes (concentration of effort) (an expansion of the classical liberal legal order to suppress lying, wishful thinking, bias and error in matters of the political commons; and a reconstruction of the houses of government as a market for the voluntary construction of commons.) 3 – A means of transition from one order to another. (An ordered means of rapid transformation within the status quo.) 4 – A set of tactics for raising the cost of the status quo: insurrection via: nullification (gradual disempowerment and transition to new government), secession(construction of a new government retaining the previous competitor), revolution (replacement of the people in government and modification of institutions eliminating the previous competitor) and civil war (destruction of the government and replacement with an entirely new one, eliminating the previous competitors). 5 – A set of leaders (speakers) to rally action. (I need 100 people. That’s all. I need only twelve who are very good.) Propertarianism and Testimonialism will be a more complete framework than has been produced before, even if we take into account all of Locke,Hume,Smith and Jefferson as a set. And if I fail, then the work sits in books and records until someone decides to use it or create something better. But I will have my good service. One leads a horse to water, but cannot make it drink. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine
  • REVOLUTION: “THE PLAN” Western Man is moral man, and moral men need: 1 – A Moral

    REVOLUTION: “THE PLAN”

    Western Man is moral man, and moral men need:

    1 – A Moral Justification for the application of Violence to institute change. (They are being lied to, and stolen from, and conquered systematically, and I explain how, why, and how to stop it.) (Ideologies require promise of actionable results within the current lifetime.)

    2 – A Solution to Demand: a set of institutional changes (concentration of effort) (an expansion of the classical liberal legal order to suppress lying, wishful thinking, bias and error in matters of the political commons; and a reconstruction of the houses of government as a market for the voluntary construction of commons.)

    3 – A means of transition from one order to another. (An ordered means of rapid transformation within the status quo.)

    4 – A set of tactics for raising the cost of the status quo: insurrection via: nullification (gradual disempowerment and transition to new government), secession(construction of a new government retaining the previous competitor), revolution (replacement of the people in government and modification of institutions eliminating the previous competitor) and civil war (destruction of the government and replacement with an entirely new one, eliminating the previous competitors).

    5 – A set of leaders (speakers) to rally action. (I need 100 people. That’s all. I need only twelve who are very good.) Propertarianism and Testimonialism will be a more complete framework than has been produced before, even if we take into account all of Locke,Hume,Smith and Jefferson as a set.

    And if I fail, then the work sits in books and records until someone decides to use it or create something better. But I will have my good service.

    One leads a horse to water, but cannot make it drink.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2015-09-02 03:13:00 UTC

  • People categorize my work as Reaction because I criticize democracy – via Hoppe

    People categorize my work as Reaction because I criticize democracy – via Hoppe.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-09-01 09:51:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638650398249742336

    Reply addressees: @Outsideness @SanguineEmpiric @MatthewRenauld

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638643403207512065


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Outsideness

    @SanguineEmpiric @curtdoolittle @MatthewRenauld A critique of MM would have earned that ‘obviously’. Not sure response to an HRx post does.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638643403207512065

  • The world doesn’t need me to write an analysis of NRx. It needs someone to advan

    The world doesn’t need me to write an analysis of NRx. It needs someone to advance it.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-09-01 09:50:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638650139318611968

    Reply addressees: @Outsideness @SanguineEmpiric @MatthewRenauld

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638643403207512065


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Outsideness

    @SanguineEmpiric @curtdoolittle @MatthewRenauld A critique of MM would have earned that ‘obviously’. Not sure response to an HRx post does.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638643403207512065

  • Once you realize they’re just gossiping in order to steal from you it’s simple

    Once you realize they’re just gossiping in order to steal from you it’s simple.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-31 11:58:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638319901145440256

    Reply addressees: @johann_theron @Outsideness @amerika_blog @AlbertBrenner1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638273501913333760


    IN REPLY TO:

    @johann_theron

    The cause of SJW behaviour? @Outsideness @amerika_blog @curtdoolittle @AlbertBrenner1 http://t.co/wmxwizk6EY

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638273501913333760

  • (i) and we need to construct a government of bias-exchanges, not majority assent

    (i) and we need to construct a government of bias-exchanges, not majority assent.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-31 11:56:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638319435514781696

    Reply addressees: @johann_theron @Outsideness @amerika_blog @AlbertBrenner1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638273501913333760


    IN REPLY TO:

    @johann_theron

    The cause of SJW behaviour? @Outsideness @amerika_blog @curtdoolittle @AlbertBrenner1 http://t.co/wmxwizk6EY

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638273501913333760