Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • If you fix it, will it be NRx any longer? That’s my question I suppose. 😉

    If you fix it, will it be NRx any longer? That’s my question I suppose. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-28 05:05:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/637128913735581696

    Reply addressees: @ne0colonial @Nick_B_Steves

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/637125381569540096


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/637125381569540096

  • I didn’t mean to trash #NRx, just show it is a step but not a solution. 🙁

    I didn’t mean to trash #NRx, just show it is a step but not a solution. 🙁


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-28 04:26:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/637119131070951424

  • I didn’t mean to trash #NRx, just show it is a step but not a solution. 🙁

    I didn’t mean to trash #NRx, just show it is a step but not a solution. 🙁


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-28 00:26:00 UTC

  • I think that every attempt at retention of sentimental loading so appealing to c

    I think that every attempt at retention of sentimental loading so appealing to conservatives has failed and will do so.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-26 17:36:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/636593036840058880

    Reply addressees: @wargfranklin

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/636592403156103168


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/636592403156103168

  • MM has the cathedral theory as a set of incentives(neopuritans). KM’s does (cosm

    MM has the cathedral theory as a set of incentives(neopuritans). KM’s does (cosmo group strategy). Hoppe does (bureaucracy).


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-26 17:33:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/636592356452663296

    Reply addressees: @Nick_B_Steves

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/636591072609726464


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/636591072609726464

  • A NEW ERA OF POLITICAL INNOVATION!!! (political innovation is technological inno

    A NEW ERA OF POLITICAL INNOVATION!!!

    (political innovation is technological innovation)

    Just going through some old stuff during life in Seattle/Bellevue/Redmond, and comparing the people, daily activities, and well… you know, it’s all good QUALITY, and it’s almost utopian in pleasantry, but its nothing like over here: millennia of accumulated informational density.

    Can you imagine how awesome america would be if each state or city state could engage in political innovation without permission from Washington? OMG.

    It is as far from Seattle to the next ‘interesting’ place (san francisco) as it is to cross most of continental Europe. and really, what’s the difference between SF/Portland/Seattle/VancouverBC? The cultural difference is the interior (the west cost culture is a thin strip 100 miles wide, and the rest is ‘interior west’. We are our own country out there. Socal is …. Mexico now. Texas would rule if it could. Many of the states would rule if they could.

    What if each state just collected its own income taxes? (we know how that would work out – and it would be GOOD.)

    What if each state didn’t lose its political talent to a deep hierarchy in DC and instead had a shallow hierarchy locally?

    What if the military and the dollar remained but each region made its own?

    We would see political innovation on a scale that has not been seen since the discovery of the new world.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-26 07:50:00 UTC

  • FREE KOENIGSBERG, FREE UKRAINE !!!!! 😉

    FREE KOENIGSBERG, FREE UKRAINE !!!!!

    😉


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-25 02:50:00 UTC

  • Full Spectrum Incremental Pacification

    Full Spectrum of Pacification: 1 – Reproductive limitation. 2 – Incremental Suppression. 3 – Physical Removal. 4 – Genetic Pacification (Hanging). 5 – Culling (Casualties).

  • Full Spectrum Incremental Pacification

    Full Spectrum of Pacification: 1 – Reproductive limitation. 2 – Incremental Suppression. 3 – Physical Removal. 4 – Genetic Pacification (Hanging). 5 – Culling (Casualties).

  • Should We Stop ‘Dumb’ People from Voting?

    [T]he Monarchy (Hereditary self interest), The Nobility (Military Men Who Defend Territory), The Bourgeoisie/House (Business and Finance who produce Goods and Services), The Church/Proletarians (Dependents who require support). If each of these houses exists, those with related interests can vote for the advocacy of their interests (cultural persistence, military service and security, money and property, a need for commons), but regardless of the size of any constituency, all of them must agree; or at least none of them need object, to the provision of any contract between all (legislation). The error we made in voting was to dismantle the separation of houses in the belief we could construct an aristocracy of everyone, rather than adding a house for the proletarians upon the collapse of the church under darwin, and the consequential enfranchisement of women. We went from a system of TRADE between the classes (church, commons and lords) to a system of majoritarian tyranny. Today, single women and minorities rule, despite the fact that if married couples only voted, we would have remained a high trust homogenous society. All left movement, the destruction of the family, political correctness, the great society failure and the opening of our borders has been accomplished by the aggressive left, media and academy as an attack on western civilizations five thousand year tradition of incrementally suppressing parasitism and free riding, and the constant pressure of eugenic reproduction.