Curt Doolittle

Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • ITS ABOUT LYING BY RUSSIANS AND UTOPIANISM BY AMERICANS I don’t disagree with Ru

    ITS ABOUT LYING BY RUSSIANS AND UTOPIANISM BY AMERICANS

    I don’t disagree with Russian strategy in the sense that more civilized peoples should both protect themselves from less civilized people, support strong rulers if they must, rule them if they must, and reduce them to servitude or barbarism if they must.

    I disagree that Russians are more civilized than eastern europeans – they’re objectively not: the degree of suppression of free riding (imposed cost, parasitism) is the objective measure of the inferiority or superiority of any people.) By this measure Russians regress civil societies.

    And even more, I disagree with their constant lying about themselves, and what they’re doing. Lying is not a sign of strength. It is an admission of weakness. It is an admission of failure. The strong need not lie.

    If Russians came out and said the truth: that they are surrounded on the south and east by vast numbers of barbarians even less civilized than themselves, and that they must either rule them or parent them into modernity, then most of us would agree with them – it’s just true by every single objective measure. I don’t understand why Russians shouldn’t parent their neighbors into modernity or at least contain them through strong rule.

    If they came out and said the truth: that western democracy has handed over civilization to barbarians both old and new, due largely to the destructive impulses of women, then that also would be true. If they came out and said that they must create a diverse economy, increase their native population, expand rule of law and crush corruption, and that they need oil revenues captured by the state to do so, we would understand.

    But, they lie. If Russians are really strong and brave and in the right. then why are all the lies necessary? Because they know the opposite is true: Russia is weak, has always been weak, and Moscow has overstretched its capabilities beyond those of its population, economy, and institutions – just like the Mongols did. Russians still are the product of mongol invasion. They never developed a militia, a middle class, professional managers, chivalry, rule of law, or the enlightenment, or the dream of an aristocracy of everyone.

    Conversely, westerner’s don’t lie you know. We vary from the Continentally optimistic, to the anglo idealistic, to the american christian utopian. Americans actually believe their utopian ideology and its marxist and christian origins. That’s what is wrong with America and the west. They believe the fallacy of equality.

    The truth is in the middle: between Russian Paternalism and Western Truth Telling. And exclusive of Russian nihilistic lying and Western utopianism. And it is the truth that will unite us.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-09-24 05:01:00 UTC

  • What do you think of this (on forms of government)

    What do you think of this (on forms of government):

    Source date (UTC): 2015-09-20 09:17:00 UTC

  • ON NSA INTEREST IN YOU (AND ME AND ANYONE ELSE FOR THAT MATTER) ON FB. 1) Search

    ON NSA INTEREST IN YOU (AND ME AND ANYONE ELSE FOR THAT MATTER) ON FB.

    1) Search engines are more effective than friends lists.

    2) And you don’t write in Arabic.

    3) And you aren’t writing across borders.

    4) They have better things to do.

    I’ve been both a justice department employee, and on the C list in the past, and that hasn’t stopped the government from asking me for help.

    RUSSIANS: The Russians work by buying influence with public intellectuals (people who write stuff). They play to egos. Russian ‘spies’ have the easiest job of all: find ‘useful idiots’. They are great at it.

    CHINESE: The Chinese work by stealing info via blood relations in the states. They play to genetics, nationalism, racism, and the Chinese ‘chip on their shoulder’. They are very good at it.

    MUSLIMS: The Muslims work by inciting violence with outcasts. They play to the contradiction between islam’s utopian promise and it’s evident contradiction in reality as the religion of the lower (lowest) classes. They are becoming reasonably good at it.

    JEWS: The Jews work by using money to buy influence. They play of tribal common interest. They are very good at it.

    AMERICANS: Americans work by gathering signal intelligence. They play off the distribution of american military, technical, financial, and commercial prowess to less developed countries, and discontent by the middle and upper middle classes in those countries.

    Real ‘spies’ are very small in number. The simple ones are attache’s to embassies. The better are employees of foreign companies, or foreigners hired as employees of companies. Then there are just plain specialists who can be inserted into nearly any position as needed, and they develop RELATIONSHIPS.

    We all know how each group works. So we investigate each group by the means that group uses to organize.

    So unless you start threatening the president, or specifically inciting violence you’re just another annoying malcontent. And there are a lot of you. And you’re little more than evidence of the superiority of our legal system’s ability to tolerate intellectual dissent, while at the same time prohibiting physical violence.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-09-20 06:40:00 UTC

  • Public transportation is a public health problem. 🙁

    Public transportation is a public health problem. 🙁

    Source date (UTC): 2015-09-19 04:02:00 UTC

  • WE CAN TEACH TESTIMONIALISM WITHOUT MILITARY SERVICE We can buy our franchise by

    WE CAN TEACH TESTIMONIALISM WITHOUT MILITARY SERVICE

    We can buy our franchise by performing care-taking and emergency services instead of military service. We just must buy our franchise with that which cannot be replaced by money: our demonstrated self-sacrifice of irreplaceable time for the commons.

    I talk about the evolution of western testimonialism, reason, science, jury and senate as the product of our familial military financing, individual tactics, and unforgiving martial contract and epistemology. I talk about buying into the franchise of property rights by sacrifice in defense of those property rights, and offensive expansion of those property rights to others.

    But we can teach testimonialism through our western myths, and through narrative, grammar (operationalism, and eprime), rhetoric, logic, and propertarian ethics.

    We can teach history not as political history, but as the history of evolution of various technologies of epistemology(knowledge), cooperation(ethics and politics and institutions), and construction(action).

    We need not continue to teach a false religion as a pseudoscience.

    We need not continue reversing 5000 years of western evolutionary development.

    We can prevent the second ‘mysticism’ of the west, this time in the form of pseudoscience

    We just cannot do so by begging, we must do so by force.

    End the century of lies.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2015-09-17 04:11:00 UTC

  • THE POLITICAL VIRTUES OF MILITARY SERVICE The military does an exceptional job o

    THE POLITICAL VIRTUES OF MILITARY SERVICE

    The military does an exceptional job of converting upper proletarian and lower middle class men who would otherwise be selfish and useless into useful cogs in an amazingly large and complex machine. It is a very organized pseudo-society, but it does form a society. I am surrounded by these guys at the moment and it’s amazing how GOOD FOR YOU that military service is in making you a less selfish and capable member of the polity. I still think public service and basic training in the militial model should be required. I would have sucked at it. It would have been very hard on me. But I would have done it. And I think I would have been the better for it. A lot of men would happily join companies that would ‘take care of them for life’ at very low disposable income, and be perfectly happy to not fend for themselves in the labor market directly. The military (service), Guild (professional union), and entrepreneurial(independent) models all work, as long as we do not try to make them universals.

    Monopoly is the enemy. Not government. Not state. But monopoly. Because we are vastly unequal.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-09-16 06:44:00 UTC

  • POLITICIANS ARE AN UNNECESSARY EVIL We no longer need politicians and representa

    POLITICIANS ARE AN UNNECESSARY EVIL

    We no longer need politicians and representatives, and no longer need democratic assent to pass something, and to divide a budget equally, and to vote with money where it is required. In fact, all politicians do is to create hazards. So given that distance no longer impacts ability to cooperate and communicate in real time; and given that concentration of politicians in one place merely creates a perfect environment for lobbying and corruption; and given that running for office produces nothing but negative externalities exacerbating corruption; it seems much wiser to let anyone post proposals (contracts), to reject any proposal of involuntary transfer(propertarianism), to hold debates in public over them with the best public intellectuals contributing to the discourse; to require truthful speech in such deliberation (testimonialism), and to select a jury by lot from each house to spend those budgets, and enter into those contracts. Politicians are an unnecessary evil in a world of instantaneous communication.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-09-16 06:34:00 UTC

  • pledges to end federal employee unions. Well now we are seeing interesting polic

    http://hotair.com/archives/2015/09/14/hot-air-exclusive-walker-pledges-to-end-federal-public-employee-unions/Walker pledges to end federal employee unions.

    Well now we are seeing interesting policy ideas!

    Source date (UTC): 2015-09-14 11:33:00 UTC

  • READ: 5 PAPERS. Will we revolt before the cathedral complex kills us off?

    https://jaymans.wordpress.com/2015/09/12/key-recent-papers-and-postings/MUST READ: 5 PAPERS.

    Will we revolt before the cathedral complex kills us off?

    Source date (UTC): 2015-09-13 12:00:00 UTC

  • CAN I PLEASE HAVE BETTERS? I mean, I want a king whose family has been in royalt

    CAN I PLEASE HAVE BETTERS?

    I mean, I want a king whose family has been in royalty for a thousand years. I want a senate with Norman Schwartzkopf’s, a house of commerce with captains of finance and industry, a house of commons with heads of households (families) and small and medium business owners, and a house of dependents who are none of the above. Why do we vote with unaccountable numbers rather than measurable money? Why do I have to listen to professional politicians lie about a non-existent common good, instead of the point of view of each of the classes? Why do we engage in the greatest lie since monotheism: democracy, rather than discuss the expressed wants and needs of the different classes?

    I am happy to acknowledge my betters in family and business, industry and finance, trade routes and defense. Why do I not want my betters to rule? Why would any of us prefer the existing system of conflict generation and lying over truthful speech in the pursuit of creating commons between the classes?

    **I pray thee god, grant us kings, and deliver us from the people.**

    Source date (UTC): 2015-09-12 07:59:00 UTC