Curt Doolittle

Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • DID THE MARXIST/SOCIALIST-LIBERTARIAN-NEOCONS GIVE US THE INCENTIVE TO FINALLY O

    DID THE MARXIST/SOCIALIST-LIBERTARIAN-NEOCONS GIVE US THE INCENTIVE TO FINALLY OVERCOME OUR HUMILITY?

    From one perspective, the Marxist-Socialists and the Ashkenazi Pseudoscientific Enlightenment combined with protestant feminists (less attractive women), catholics (the lower classes), blacks (the underclasses) created a successful series of revolts against the productive classes (military, legal, financial, entrepreneurial, agrarian), by co-opting media(selling consumer goods to all of their constituents), education (indoctrinating generations into the false narrative), and academy(selling false narratives to new constituents in exchange for economic rewards) in a successful attempt to overthrow our aryan(eugenic) experiment in formalizing contractualism (constitutional natural law) into a new civilization.

    From another, without this crisis would we have every discovered, written down, our reasons for excellence in the ancient and modern worlds?

    Have they not given us the excuse to finally formulate, articulate, document, and institutionalize our ancient traditions as a new world order – not just for ourselves, but for all mankind?

    If the liars can create three books of lies, then why cannot the truth-speakers create a book of truths?

    If lies can be spread by the sword, why cannot truths be spread by the contemporary weaponry?

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-09 06:14:00 UTC

  • The timing is crass, and a apologise in advance: but when I say that stability i

    The timing is crass, and a apologise in advance: but when I say that stability is an illusion, and that our order is fragile, and that revolution is easier now than at any time in history, this is an example of why.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-08 01:55:00 UTC

  • YOU CREATE LIBERTY WITHOUT PERMISSION You can beg for Liberty and at best receiv

    YOU CREATE LIBERTY WITHOUT PERMISSION

    You can beg for Liberty and at best receive permission.

    Or you can create Liberty without permission.

    Liberty is produced always and only by a small minority through organized violence preventing any other alternative rule.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-07 03:29:00 UTC

  • ***I am not concerned with should, I am concerned with shall. Not in persuasion

    ***I am not concerned with should, I am concerned with shall. Not in persuasion but compliance. Not in compromise but in defeat. Not in tolerance but in deportation. And should deportation fail, in hanging, impaling, crosses and pyres.***

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-07 02:15:00 UTC

  • In most cases, you have power because people want you to have it

    In most cases, you have power because people want you to have it.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-05 15:25:00 UTC

  • Some empire, nation, state, or people will be more powerful than the rest, wheth

    Some empire, nation, state, or people will be more powerful than the rest, whether it be global or regional or local.

    Since there will always be someone more powerful, and since the powerful determine the limits to which they wish to exercise their power, it’s beneficial to choose which people, state, nation, or empire shall be the most powerful.

    Deus Vult

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-04 13:08:00 UTC

  • TIME TO TEACH ELITES THEY ARE NOTHING WITHOUT THEIR PEOPLE (by Eli Harman ) Elit

    TIME TO TEACH ELITES THEY ARE NOTHING WITHOUT THEIR PEOPLE

    (by Eli Harman )

    Elites are naturally less racist, less ethnocentric, more cosmopolitan, than the lower classes. Elites can interact with *other* elites as peers. They don’t have to squabble over pieces of pie because they can make pie.

    But the lower classes are justifiably racist, nationalistic, xenophobic, because they are in direct competition over resources they don’t create, infrastructure, services, social spending, jobs, and so on and so forth.

    Additionally, the higher impulsivity of the lower classes increases the frictions that arise from differences and proximity. And they can’t afford to isolate themselves from these.

    The classes can cooperate on common interests. And elites can cooperate with foreign elites. But in order for these two imperatives not to conflict, and for classes not to conflict, elites must stop claiming, defending, exercising, and sacralizing a “right” to betray and sacrifice their lower classes to others.

    A people are less without their elites. But elites are nothing without their people.

    Time to teach them.

    H/t Curt Doolittle

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-04 01:34:00 UTC

  • I understand that for the lower and working class that the 88 movements are aest

    I understand that for the lower and working class that the 88 movements are aesthetically, genetically, and morally appealing. I understand that the militancy is emotionally empowering. But that time has passed. Each era requires a different political technology. That era of combatting communism required fascism under industrialism competitively at its peak. This urgent era of combating invasion, dilution, progressivism, postmodernism and pseudoscience, in the information era, competitively on the way down, requires different solutions.

    Now my solution might not be the best one. But it’s a solution. And it’s not as though western man has done well at producing solutions to this problem.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-03 23:31:00 UTC

  • HE WAS WRONG: WAR IS NOT AN EXTENSION OF POLITICS Clausewitz was pretty much wro

    HE WAS WRONG: WAR IS NOT AN EXTENSION OF POLITICS

    Clausewitz was pretty much wrong about everything. War is not an extension of politics. Politics is a means by which we limit war. It is not politics that is the basis of human interaction, but the ever present rational choice between war, conflict, boycott, cooperation, insurance, and kin-sacrifice. Political organizations exist to defend the interests of the group from competitors, and if possible convert the group to the most successful competitor, and therefore the competitor with the greatest discounts on negotiations with other groups. Politics is the extension of cooperation, and when politics fails, we return to the prior state – whatever is in our rational self-interest. But, as we are strong when organized gainst competitors, and weak when disorganized in the fact of competitors, when political solutions fail, we merely choose politically organized conflict of large numbers rather than otherwise organized conflict of smaller numbers – thus allowing us to concentrate our full resources on the conflict in question.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-03 06:32:00 UTC

  • because you guys got nothing but sermons and inspiration. Political change requi

    because you guys got nothing but sermons and inspiration. Political change requires institutional solutions. Not inspiration.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-02 15:50:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/749269001302339584

    Reply addressees: @JohnRebel14

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/749187668345487360

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/749187668345487360