Curt Doolittle

Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • A SUBJECTIVE TO OBJECTIVE TRANSLATION WORTH REPEATING —Humans are adapted to w

    A SUBJECTIVE TO OBJECTIVE TRANSLATION WORTH REPEATING

    —Humans are adapted to want traditional forms of governance. They want law. They want to be ruled by legitimate, worthy, and trusted authority. They want a leader who commands the force of the nation to represent them to the outside world.”— Adolphus Völkermord

    Yes … and we want them because we want low opportunity costs (a dense population), low transaction costs (trust), low-cost information(homogeneity language, and interests), low-cost negotiation (stable norms: manners, ethics, morals), high returns on our work effort (a market and competitive commons), insurance against defection and defectors(law), and insurance against our failure (insurer of last resort), and insurance against the loss of all of the above (military defense).

    What I have learned to say is that we want a low cost of ‘calculating’ probability of success in our endeavors, and high returns on our efforts expended:

    *The greatest return, in the shortest time, for the least effort, with the greatest degree of certainty, at the lowest risk*

    In other words, we are like every other creature, object, molecule, and particle in the known universe.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-13 04:07:00 UTC

  • The Chinese strategic method is to delay and deceive while avoiding direct confl

    The Chinese strategic method is to delay and deceive while avoiding direct conflict until they have obtained an entrenched position and win by default because the cost is too high to reverse.

    Now, the western model was – traditionally – to solve problems quickly before the other side could concentrate great forces.

    And so the problem with the Chinese strategy is that while it has worked throughout most of their history, it didn’t work against the Japanese, and moreover, it will not work against the west unless the west defacto wants it to.

    I love the fact that china is building up the south china sea while the international courts say that they have no claim to it.

    Just gives the usa an excuse.

    sigh.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-12 12:32:00 UTC

  • My political agenda is to devolve the empire, to constrain any federal governmen

    My political agenda is to devolve the empire, to constrain any federal government to defense, insurer or last resort, and interstate property conflict, and to liberate as many states to experiment in as many ways possible, creating lots of opportunity for ‘people at the top’.

    Let a thousand nations bloom.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-10 22:36:00 UTC

  • BLACK PANTHERS BECOME LIBERTARIANS? —“Asked by this reporter what his group’s

    BLACK PANTHERS BECOME LIBERTARIANS?

    —“Asked by this reporter what his group’s endgame is, Omowale replied:

    The end game is land ownership. The endgame is our own government in a nation within a nation. Okay. So we claim the states of Louisiana, we claim the states of Mississippi, we claim the states of South Carolina, we claim the states of Alabama, and we claim the states of Georgia.

    We just need to start migrating back to those states and taking control of the economics in those states. If black people move in, most definitely white people will move out. So it’s not a hard process for us to have our own country within a country.”—-

    smart guy

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-10 22:30:00 UTC

  • “CREATE A COUNTRY WITHIN A COUNTRY” Great idea. Different peoples need different

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/07/10/exclusive-new-black-panther-leader-country-within/PANTHERS: “CREATE A COUNTRY WITHIN A COUNTRY”

    Great idea. Different peoples need different states so that they can construct the commons that suit their interests.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-10 22:28:00 UTC

  • If black Americans take this much further we are only going to have to hit light

    If black Americans take this much further we are only going to have to hit light infrastructure and publish demands.

    If you take out the police the next level is military, and then we have won.

    I’ve been stating for years now that it is not as important to plan a revolution as it is to constantly exploit opportunities.

    If the black lives movement wants to save us time, effort, and lives, then that’s all the better.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-10 12:55:00 UTC

  • We get Hillary, and we get our excuse for revolution. We get trump and we buy ti

    We get Hillary, and we get our excuse for revolution. We get trump and we buy time.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-10 03:52:00 UTC

  • Presidents Matter. Wilson(German Surrender), FDR(pre-30’s immigrants), Kennedy-J

    Presidents Matter.

    Wilson(German Surrender), FDR(pre-30’s immigrants), Kennedy-Johnson(underclass boomers), Carter(islamic fundamentalism), Clinton (destruction of military tradition), Obama (islamic expansionism, anti-white racism, empire-withrawl)

    We must not allow discretion in such matters of intertemporal import.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-09 07:02:00 UTC

  • Kennedy-Johnson did it. We could have evolved past it otherwise. We should have

    Kennedy-Johnson did it. We could have evolved past it otherwise.

    We should have killed all the rebelling students, socialists, and journalists in the 60’s and ended it then. McCarthyism was a failure because it was – in typical anglo christian fashion – too gentle a movement.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-09 06:58:00 UTC

  • The “Kennedy Solution” is the most humiliating for a traitor. You gradually kill

    The “Kennedy Solution” is the most humiliating for a traitor. You gradually kill off their progeny, then the father, leaving only the mother to suffer as an example to future generations.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-09 06:57:00 UTC