Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • @POTUS No, it’s revolution, not a race war. It’s the end of the continental expa

    @POTUS No, it’s revolution, not a race war. It’s the end of the continental expa

    @POTUS No, it’s revolution, not a race war. It’s the end of the continental expansion. https://t.co/2Nyr2jiFaU


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-14 00:03:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/896884881875116032

  • 2017-08-14

    2017-08-14

    @POTUS https://t.co/pt8zcx1M9I


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-14 00:02:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/896884637024366592

  • We were just getting organized before the election. Clinton would have given us

    We were just getting organized before the election. Clinton would have given us immediate cause for revolt. Trump bought us time to organize


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-14 00:01:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/896884535966781441

    Reply addressees: @Digitalgreatime

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/896571580129714176


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/896571580129714176

  • “CURT: ARE WE LOOKING AT A RACE WAR?”— No. We are looking at the exhaustion of

    —“CURT: ARE WE LOOKING AT A RACE WAR?”—

    No.

    We are looking at the exhaustion of the value of a central government that was imposed upon the various states in order to maintain control over westward expansion across the continent after the louisiana purchase.

    At present there is no further value in that government, since the various regions have very different ambitions, and the six immigrant cities have various ambitions. All these ambitions are at odds.

    It is possible to devolve the federal government out of the business of norms, and limited to territorial defense, insurer of last resort, and resolution of disputes in interstate trade.

    What we should seek is devolution, elimination of the house, senate, and presidency, and limited secession, leaving the governors to administer what remains of the federal government.

    We will then allow people in the country to sort into regions by county, with freedom of association and disassociation at the county level. This will organically divide the country into natural territories. and it will allow us to create a diverse set of polities suitable to different peoples.

    We will separate white conservatives and progressives and remove the left from our gene pool (again).

    The long term effect will be the rapid increase in high trust and desirability of conservative white territories and the continuous decline of urban and coastal cities into favellas.

    Military families will concentrate in conservative regions, and the end will be determined by natural consequences.

    Do not make it a race issue, make it a ‘choice for all of us to live as we wish’ – an issue for everyone.

    Freedom of association and disassociation will do the rest


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-13 19:41:00 UTC

  • “CURT: ARE WE LOOKING AT A RACE WAR?”— No. We are looking at the exhaustion of

    —“CURT: ARE WE LOOKING AT A RACE WAR?”—

    No.

    We are looking at the exhaustion of the value of a central government that was imposed upon the various states in order to maintain control over westward expansion across the continent after the louisiana purchase.

    At present there is no further value in that government, since the various regions have very different ambitions, and the six immigrant cities have various ambitions. All these ambitions are at odds.

    It is possible to devolve the federal government out of the business of norms, and limited to territorial defense, insurer of last resort, and resolution of disputes in interstate trade.

    What we should seek is devolution, elimination of the house, senate, and presidency, and limited secession, leaving the governors to administer what remains of the federal government.

    We will then allow people in the country to sort into regions by county, with freedom of association and disassociation at the county level. This will organically divide the country into natural territories. and it will allow us to create a diverse set of polities suitable to different peoples.

    We will separate white conservatives and progressives and remove the left from our gene pool (again).

    The long term effect will be the rapid increase in high trust and desirability of conservative white territories and the continuous decline of urban and coastal cities into favellas.

    Military families will concentrate in conservative regions, and the end will be determined by natural consequences.

    Do not make it a race issue, make it a ‘choice for all of us to live as we wish’ – an issue for everyone.

    Freedom of association and disassociation will do the rest


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-13 18:23:00 UTC

  • *All revolutions are produced by exploiting available incentives.*

    *All revolutions are produced by exploiting available incentives.*


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-13 18:16:00 UTC

  • THE WORLD AGAINST WHITES via Steve Pender —“When Islamists blow children up at

    THE WORLD AGAINST WHITES

    via Steve Pender

    —“When Islamists blow children up at Ariana Grande concerts, it’s not a problem of Islam. When they drive a car into a crowd and start stabbing people at Ohio State, THEY are the ones who need sympathy because our civilized cultured “shocked” them. When they shoot dozens of gays at a night club, Democrats invite their parents to stand behind Hillary at her next rally. When their brarbous murder is so predictable that for weeks on end during what’s known as the Ramadon Bombathon they go on a global killing rampage driving truck after truck into crowds of people on the London bridge, it’s blamed on the racist whites who for not welcoming their genocide with arms opened widely enough.

    When Islam kills thousands of people in unspeakable terror attacks year after year the violence is ignored, the victims are ignored, and the perpetrators are treated as the victims. #NotAllMuslims, because the left feeds on the harvest of the brown vote farm.

    How many times did blacks have literal riots where they shouted about killing police and then ACTUALLY KILLED POLICE, but it was simply “peaceful protesting”? How about when a liberal was drunk from the hysteria and ACTUALLY SHOT A CONGRESSMAN, surely it had nothing to do with unprecedented fake news and plays and books glamorizing the murder of Republicans.

    But we supposedly live in a white supremacists where whites—who are for better or worse the founders of Europe and the USA and everywhere that’s civilized where brown people flock to and are welcomed more graciously than anywhere else in history—when these whites want to gather IN THEIR OWN LAND and advocate for their right to continue existing and to protest the erasure of our culture and history they require a federal permit that the states won’t recognize, a national emergency is called before the event can even begin, the president and ALL of the media condemns them, and when ONE person goes too far and when ONE leftist dies it’s obviously because all non-leftists are white supremacists and everyone on all sides in America and now around the globe condemns the hate from “white supremacists”.

    It’s not a left VS right thing any more. It’s THE WORLD VS whites, where all the violence and hysteria of every side is ignored or rationalized, or even blamed on whites, and where ANY resistance by whites is condemned as white supremacy. But remember that democracy is a vote farm, and they’ll turn on any untouchable group the second they find cheaper votes from a different group.”—-John R (I don’t know who that is)


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-13 17:19:00 UTC

  • Incentives: The State Always Acts To Preserve The Illusion of Power

    Incentives: The State Always Acts To Preserve The Illusion of Power.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-13 17:07:00 UTC

  • HOW REVOLUTIONS ARE WON: BY SEIGE —“I’ve seen police of my own country, beat u

    HOW REVOLUTIONS ARE WON: BY SEIGE

    —“I’ve seen police of my own country, beat up women and children, but they cuck hard when dealing with minorities who spit on national flags and curse them. Don’t count on them, they’ve been trained their whole life to obey to the system.”– Stefan Rex

    You ask the police and military and judiciary to opt in. You prosecute those who don’t. The nation depends on the illusion of power. The economics of order dictate that the ability to maintain order is limited to the normative level of suppressible crime.

    If instead, we redirect energies from crime to territorial asset protection, then the crime will expand. If we prosecute those who fail to opt in, suppression will decline, and our success and crime will expand.

    If we are successful at suppression of transportation of goods, fuel, power, and information, the economy will collapse, and crime and rebellion will overwhelm the ability of the state to maintain order.

    If we have given demands *that are possible to meet, and solve everyone’s problems by separation* then the population will prefer separation and it’s contentments with conquest and its discontent.

    You can think like a democrat monopolist seeking permission from the state, or you can think like an economist and a general trying to collapse the frail system of incentives that makes the state possible.

    You do not storm a castle. You do not rebel against an army in a castle. You burn the fields, cut off the water, and stop all transport and trade, and people in the castle surrender or die from deprivation.

    The western way of war (See Van Creveld) is to resolve issues quickly before they lead to the accumulation of asymmetric power. But once one accumulates asymmetric power, the only solution is *SEIGE*.

    In fifth generation warfare, small numbers of men, who can hide among their oppressors, can conduct a siege just as muslim raiders conducted a siege against european, byzantine, persian, egyptian, and levantine civilizations.

    Siege wins – always.

    Thus endeth the lesson.

    Curt Doolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-13 12:18:00 UTC

  • HOW CIVIL WAR IS PLAYING OUT by James Santagata Fascinating watching this play o

    HOW CIVIL WAR IS PLAYING OUT

    by James Santagata

    Fascinating watching this play out.

    1. Left owns the street, State does nothing.

    2. Alt-right (rather than Cuck-right) comes out and marches. Gets beat up., State does nothing.

    3. Alt-right, regroups, muscles up, stands toe-to-toe beats down left, States comes racing in to save left.

    At some point the State will go toe to toe with the Alt-right and that is when it becomes strategic to make sure that members of the state realize they had better stay home to protect loved ones. That is, go and patrol if you like but your home and family is not safe. Trust me. They will not patrol. Those that do are made a very messy example of.

    That is how the civil war will play out. One cannot concentrate forces everywhere. If you make the responders unwilling to respond, then the only solution is the military, and that is what we want.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-13 11:11:00 UTC