Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • “Identity politics is really about entitlement, that is to say, in the American

    —“Identity politics is really about entitlement, that is to say, in the American context it is the idea that you can get something (e.g. respect, money and recognition) simply by virtue of what you identify as/with. But you see, there is no reason why anybody should be entitled to so and so for nothing. Reward, cooperation and value are all the result of production. The more mutually beneficial production is, the more likely it is to be sustained and reproduced. Not only is it racist and unproductive to constantly yap about identity and entitlement, it is actually counter productive because, as I have said, normal people know that nothing on this earth is ever gained without merit, sacrifice or work. Rioting, name calling and crying wolf are examples of unproductive activity.”— Ayelam Valentine Agaliba


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-17 08:42:00 UTC

  • TORY (‘outlaw’, ‘pessimist’): Traditionalist in Economic, Social, and Political

    TORY (‘outlaw’, ‘pessimist’): Traditionalist in Economic, Social, and Political realms. Monarchy(king), Church(god), and Nation(country). “Rely on what has worked, we are too foolish and vain to experiment with what has worked so well for us.”

    (*Conservative Traditionalist* – Families )

    CONSERVATIVE (’empiricist’): Traditional in Social and Political realms, Liberal in Economic realm. “Expand fruits of commerce but not power of government.”

    (*Conservative* – Businesses, Upper Middle Class )

    WHIG (‘mare-drivers’, ‘optimist’): Bourgeoise government: American Government: remove power from the king and invest it in parliament. “Distribute the power of government.

    (*Classical Liberal / Libertarian* – Meritocratic Individuals )

    DEMOCRAT (‘common people’, idealist) : middle class government.

    SOCIALIST ()

    =======

    TORY (/tɔːri/) a political philosophy (Toryism) based on a British version of traditionalism and conservatism, which upholds the supremacy of social order as it has evolved throughout history.

    The Tory ethos has been summed up with the phrase “God, King and Country”. Tories generally advocate monarchism, are usually of a high church Anglican religious heritage, and are opposed to the liberalism of the Whig faction.

    Conservatism began to emerge in the late 18th century—it synthesised moderate Whig economic positions and many Tory social values to create a new political philosophy and faction, in opposition to the French Revolution.

    Edmund Burke and William Pitt the Younger led in ‘Conservatism’. Interventionism and strong armed forces were to prove a hallmark of Toryism under subsequent Prime Ministers. Due to these Tories leading the formation of the Conservative Party, members of that party are colloquially referred to as Tories, even if they are not traditionalists.

    Actual adherents to traditional Toryism in contemporary times may be referred to as “High Tories”, as the traditionalist conservative values of Toryism differ from those of the more liberal and cosmopolitan members of the Conservative Party.

    Similarly, Tories is used to describe members of the Conservative Party of Canada, regardless if they are not traditionalists. The term Blue Tory and Red Tory has been used to describe the two different wings of the federal and provincial Conservative parties in Canada.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-16 11:00:00 UTC

  • All sovereignty and pretense of liberty is the product of the militia

    All sovereignty and pretense of liberty is the product of the militia.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-16 10:27:00 UTC

  • You are forever weak. It’s only through the martial host that we are strong

    You are forever weak. It’s only through the martial host that we are strong.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-16 10:27:00 UTC

  • SOVEREIGNTY IN A SENTENCE —“It was by not taking care of the fields, but of ou

    SOVEREIGNTY IN A SENTENCE

    —“It was by not taking care of the fields, but of ourselves, that we acquired those fields.”—

    A minority of professional warriors may Profit from rule.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-16 09:13:00 UTC

  • “fear, honor and interest always seem to be the root causes of why a nation choo

    —“fear, honor and interest always seem to be the root causes of why a nation chooses to go to hostilities.”— Mattis


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-16 08:39:00 UTC

  • Question for Men (Thinking) Extending the National Guard/Reserves to the “Local

    Question for Men (Thinking)

    Extending the National Guard/Reserves to the “Local Regiment” bridging the gap between Police/Fire/Ambulance and National Guard. Basically creating a militia/emergency services group.

    1) regiments were self-forming corporations ( meaning you choose your own members with voluntary association and disassociation). Your own uniforms and that nonsense. You must have twenty five members, and pass your physicals, and

    2) gym, sport, ‘fitness expeditions’, were managed and supplied to keep you fit, plus fire, maneuver, and first aid.

    3) two weekends a month to keep you fit. two fitness tests a year which you must pass.

    4) you are ‘on call’ for civic emergencies (all of them).

    5) you cannot be called upon for foreign service.

    6) you could get $1,000 per month, 10% tax reduction,

    7) barracks (room and board) if you so desire it for half pay.

    8) Veteran status after 180 days of active service (in emergencies).

    9) after service, beginning at 55, half-pay, barracks (room and board).

    10) membership and benefits never end.

    In other words, what about paying men ‘of character’ to get fit and stay fit?


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-15 14:29:00 UTC

  • “CURT: HOW DO YOU SELF IDENTIFY?” —“Just out of interest, what do you identify

    “CURT: HOW DO YOU SELF IDENTIFY?”

    —“Just out of interest, what do you identify as politically if you were pressured into choosing?”— A New Friend

    We do not have a meaningful term for my position any longer, but the closest historical term would be a “Tory” – or a nationalist and constitutional monarchist with complete rights to sovereignty including very limited personal behavior of display, word, and deed, in the commons (public).

    However, Rather than constitutional monarchy which is open to interpretation, I use a more technical term “Nomocracy” referring to Rule of Law by Natural Law – where the constitution is very rigorously stated in strictly constructed, textual, limited, not open to interpretation, and as such, not an opinion or preference, but a scientific, and natural, immutable, inviolable “law” beyond which no man may tread.

    And where we create markets in every aspect of life: association, cooperation, reproduction (family); the production of goods, services, and information; the production of commons; the production of polities; and pursuit of group evolutionary strategy.

    And we manage these markets with a monarchy as judge of last resort, an independent judiciary of the natural law under universal standing in matters of the commons; houses of the commons for the production of commons by trade between classes limited to the creation of contracts, and forbidden from all attempts to create legislation that is a peer to or superior to the natural law of sovereignty.

    Unless I’m speaking in colloquial language as a convenience, I disavow the terms ‘libertarian’, paleo-libertarian, and paleo-conservative, as marxist inventions, and the term ‘conservative’ as meaning little other than “show me it works first before legislating it”.

    Because what one ‘believes’ is very different from what is scientifically moral, and institutionally possible, and produces sovereign, competitive, intellectually transcendent, emotionally correspondent, and biologically evolutionary outcomes.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-15 12:19:00 UTC

  • LIKE I SAID, THE ERA OF PROTESTS IS OVER —“I’m curious, any thoughts on the Un

    LIKE I SAID, THE ERA OF PROTESTS IS OVER

    —“I’m curious, any thoughts on the Unite The Right, event?”–

    From whose perspective? From mine, in my desire for revolution, it accomplished what I felt the movement needed to accomplish – disassociation with nat-socs, and realization that the era of protests is over, and that direct action is the only choice.

    Revolution comes.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-15 09:20:00 UTC

  • The government is disposable

    The government is disposable.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-14 20:45:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/897197425437413377

    Reply addressees: @Digitalgreatime

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/897173148256399360


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/897173148256399360