Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • “A warrior is someone’s child who hasn’t grown up and who can’t share the world

    —“A warrior is someone’s child who hasn’t grown up and who can’t share the world with others and must force his will on others. Humans are ALL from an anarchist order where collective decisions are made by direct consensus of tbe entire community. Amarchy isn’t where no one is in charge, it’s where everyone is in charge.”—

    Did your mommy tell you that fairy story? Are you the child of a single mother? Are you a lower prole?

    Men rule. Because if they dont, even worse men will rule.

    And we obtain rule, and preserve rule, by violence, and violence alone.

    The natural order is that the strong kill, enslave, and enserf the weak. The unnatural order is civilization.

    Which is why we have so many institutions to try to preserve it.

    Warriors are usually happy to allow you your fantasies. but never assume for a moment that you are other than the property of some group of men who find greater utility in your freedom than the higher cost of your enserfment or enslavement.

    He who can destroy a thing, owns the thing. Everything else is permission.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-17 13:55:00 UTC

  • “We need to set the precedent that if your country dumps a bunch of underclass i

    —“We need to set the precedent that if your country dumps a bunch of underclass invaders on ours, we’ll dump something even worse on you…”— Eli Harman

    (a) I put that in the constitution.

    (b) “if you are exporting bodies you exporting harm, and thereore conducting war”.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-17 10:28:00 UTC

  • “A doctrine of the state can only propose values to test the elective affinities

    —“A doctrine of the state can only propose values to test the elective affinities and the dominant or latent vocations of a nation. If a people cannot or does not want to acknowledge the values that we have called ‘traditional’, and which define a true Right, it deserves to be left to itself. At most, we can point out to it the illusions and suggestions of which it has been or is the victim, which are due to a general action which has often been systematically organised, and to regressive processes. If not even this leads to a sensible result, this people will suffer the fate that it has created, by making use of its ‘liberty’.​” ― Julius Evola

    I mean, this is a great example. Define “true right”, Tradition and Traditional. And do so in a way that does not require men of knowledge of the universe to repeat sophisms or submit to fairy stories.

    We cannot uninvent knowledge of the world that gives us our dominion over it and return to prior states of ignorance. We must create prior VALUE SYSTEMS out of new language, not old.

    Silly old men try to restore the past. Those of us with some teaspoon of wisdom merely take lessons of past and present and propose solutions to old problems in the framing of the present.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-17 08:37:00 UTC

  • WEALTH PERMITS CHOICE AND WE CHOOSE SEPARATISM. You may choose whatever you want

    WEALTH PERMITS CHOICE AND WE CHOOSE SEPARATISM.

    You may choose whatever you want once we are separated. Otherwise the only solution is war.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 22:31:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1008114788113633280

  • Untitled

    https://nypost.com/2018/06/15/duterte-wants-to-give-the-public-42000-free-guns/https://nypost.com/2018/06/15/duterte-wants-to-give-the-public-42000-free-guns/


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 20:17:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://nypost.com/2018/06/15/duterte-wants-to-give-the-public-42000-free-guns/

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 20:17:00 UTC

  • WEALTH PERMITS CHOICE AND WE CHOOSE SEPARATISM. You may choose whatever you want

    WEALTH PERMITS CHOICE AND WE CHOOSE SEPARATISM.

    You may choose whatever you want once we are separated. Otherwise the only solution is war.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 18:31:00 UTC

  • “Why cant we all be shareholders? Who are we serving?”— Tom James Bingo. Consi

    —“Why cant we all be shareholders? Who are we serving?”— Tom James

    Bingo. Consider yourself fully enlightened. There is only us and them until there is US ALONE.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 18:30:00 UTC

  • WARRIORS AND TONGUE WAGGERS LIBER-TINE/TARIAN-ISM IS DEAD – IT WAS ALWAYS A LIE

    WARRIORS AND TONGUE WAGGERS LIBER-TINE/TARIAN-ISM IS DEAD – IT WAS ALWAYS A LIE

    Libertarians (libertines) and ancaps are statistically irrelevant. Predisposed to tongue wagging and not to violence necessary to impose rule of law. So the issue here is that libertinism (rothbardianism, ancapism) is dead. And that classical liberalism is largely dead. And that all that can be learned from the failures of the past 350 years, is that markets-in-everything mean that we should have given additional houses to additional classes as they became participatory, and preserved the houses as a market for commons between the classes, and likewise prohibited the production of law (legislation), only contract between the classes under usual contractual terms.

    We had the perfect government with the Scandianvian and germanic monarchies under sovereignty (rule of law of reciprocity, universal standing, and universal applicability), with the monarch as the judge of last resort, and able to dispense with bureaucracies or the government at a whim.

    THIS MEANS LIBERTARIANISM IN ALL FORMS WAS ALWAYS A LIE…… Both anglo (classical liberal) and jewish (libertine) were both lies. There is only one law and only one means of imposing it: the organized violence of enough men that the state cannot withstand their revolt.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 18:23:00 UTC

  • CONSERVATIVES (ARISTOCRACY) WERE FROZEN IN ANCIENT ARGUMENT THE NEW RIGHT IS THE

    CONSERVATIVES (ARISTOCRACY) WERE FROZEN IN ANCIENT ARGUMENT

    THE NEW RIGHT IS THE SCIENTIFIC RIGHT

    Conservatives were stuck with a moral, religious, traditional set of arguments without themselves understanding why our civilization had ‘sped faster than the rest’. Worse, they bought into the lie just as libertarians bought into the lie of an aristocracy (sovereignty) of everyone.

    THE NEW RIGHT = SCIENTIFIC RIGHT. The alt right uses ridicule, but by and large the new right differs from the old right in that we now have DATA and we have it from a century of failures with the falsehoods of classical liberalism, and the falsehoods of marxist-postmodernism.

    My work is just going back to our roots: impose the law with violence and incrementally suppress all transgressions of it. Men will naturally insure kin, so create nation states, or at least small local polities in the Swiss model with federal governments providing only reciprocal decidability over inter-state conflicts, and acting as insurer of last resort.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 18:23:00 UTC