Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • Pandora’s Box of Democracy

    There are always weak men. They are never sufficient in numbers, and easily shamed by the strong. There are however far too many weak women, and they will not be shamed by the strong, only doubling-down on their impulses. As such, opening Pandora’s Box by the inclusion of women into the process of political decisions, without expressly limiting the impulses of women, allowed for the combination of weak men, weak women, and those who would profit from enabling weak men and weak women – the inverse of those who traditionally carried the burden to shaming and policing weak men and weak women.

    • A separate house for women would have done it.
    • Limiting the vote to married households would have done it.
    • Limiting the vote to married households with children and property would have done it best of all.
    • But while as families we share common interests, as individuals we do not.
  • Pandora’s Box of Democracy

    There are always weak men. They are never sufficient in numbers, and easily shamed by the strong. There are however far too many weak women, and they will not be shamed by the strong, only doubling-down on their impulses. As such, opening Pandora’s Box by the inclusion of women into the process of political decisions, without expressly limiting the impulses of women, allowed for the combination of weak men, weak women, and those who would profit from enabling weak men and weak women – the inverse of those who traditionally carried the burden to shaming and policing weak men and weak women.

    • A separate house for women would have done it.
    • Limiting the vote to married households would have done it.
    • Limiting the vote to married households with children and property would have done it best of all.
    • But while as families we share common interests, as individuals we do not.
  • The Lies of The Enlightenments

    –“[we suffer from] ideological weakness”— Actually It’s classical liberal dishonesty combined with malincentives of global empire. There is no possibility of an aristocracy of everyone, nor are we in any way equal. That was just a ruse to sieze power from the landed aristocracy the same way the marxists/socialist/postmodernists have used similar arguments to undermine America – via women’s inclusion in the voting booth. The lie of the bourgeoise society – the theft of aristocratic civilization by classical liberal (middle class) ruse, the way it’s been stolen by the radical (underclass/academic) ruse by claiming oppression. That lie is what begins it all. There is no such thing as bourgeoise civlization other than the tents of diasporic trade route travelers and pirates, hawking goods in bazaars without liability of warranty. Aristocracy = Sovereignty. Aristocratic Egalitarians: those who will carry the burden of reciprocal insurance (sovereignty and reciprocity) may join the aristocracy.

  • The Lies of The Enlightenments

    –“[we suffer from] ideological weakness”— Actually It’s classical liberal dishonesty combined with malincentives of global empire. There is no possibility of an aristocracy of everyone, nor are we in any way equal. That was just a ruse to sieze power from the landed aristocracy the same way the marxists/socialist/postmodernists have used similar arguments to undermine America – via women’s inclusion in the voting booth. The lie of the bourgeoise society – the theft of aristocratic civilization by classical liberal (middle class) ruse, the way it’s been stolen by the radical (underclass/academic) ruse by claiming oppression. That lie is what begins it all. There is no such thing as bourgeoise civlization other than the tents of diasporic trade route travelers and pirates, hawking goods in bazaars without liability of warranty. Aristocracy = Sovereignty. Aristocratic Egalitarians: those who will carry the burden of reciprocal insurance (sovereignty and reciprocity) may join the aristocracy.

  • Listen. People Revolt Under Predictable Criteria

    Listen, people revolt when (a) there are enough excess(unsatisfied) young men, (b) the status quo is no longer tolerable (c) there is some factor that is discreet enough to rally against, (d) they have something to revolt in favor of, (e) they have some idea of the sequence of actions to bring it about, and (f) a vision of the consequences that is better than the status quo. Talk is cheap. Actions are not. Plans are not. Because both actions and plans are testable.

  • Listen. People Revolt Under Predictable Criteria

    Listen, people revolt when (a) there are enough excess(unsatisfied) young men, (b) the status quo is no longer tolerable (c) there is some factor that is discreet enough to rally against, (d) they have something to revolt in favor of, (e) they have some idea of the sequence of actions to bring it about, and (f) a vision of the consequences that is better than the status quo. Talk is cheap. Actions are not. Plans are not. Because both actions and plans are testable.

  • “The more I look into it, the more I think that the family should be sovereign a

    —“The more I look into it, the more I think that the family should be sovereign and not the individual.”—Steven Jackson

    (bingo)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 15:42:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1008011839878455297

  • “Republicans own guns to protect themselves from Democrats.” — Scott Adams (h/

    —“Republicans own guns to protect themselves from Democrats.” — Scott Adams

    (h/t John Mark )


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 15:38:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1008011033359867905

  • (School in my son’s neighborhood went on lock down because of a black bear. Reme

    (School in my son’s neighborhood went on lock down because of a black bear. Remember when when we carried rifles to school? We could do that when were were homogenous.)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 11:50:00 UTC

  • “The more I look into it, the more I think that the family should be sovereign a

    —“The more I look into it, the more I think that the family should be sovereign and not the individual.”—Steven Jackson

    (bingo)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 11:41:00 UTC