Source date (UTC): 2018-06-17 18:49:00 UTC
Category: Politics, Power, and Governance
-
Everything which makes man not-animal (language, society, institutions.etc) are
—Everything which makes man not-animal (language, society, institutions.etc) are proxies for violence. Once this pill had been swallowed, a whole universe of concepts fall into place and a few critical lies are seen as obviously false.”— Bill Joslin
(elegant)
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-17 18:32:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1008417217824903170
-
The New Right Is the Scientific Right
CONSERVATIVES (ARISTOCRACY) WERE FROZEN IN ANCIENT ARGUMENT THE NEW RIGHT IS THE SCIENTIFIC RIGHT Conservatives were stuck with a moral, religious, traditional set of arguments without themselves understanding why our civilization had ‘sped faster than the rest’. Worse, they bought into the lie just as libertarians bought into the lie of an aristocracy (sovereignty) of everyone. THE NEW RIGHT = SCIENTIFIC RIGHT. The alt right uses ridicule, but by and large the new right differs from the old right in that we now have DATA and we have it from a century of failures with the falsehoods of classical liberalism, and the falsehoods of marxist-postmodernism. My work is just going back to our roots: impose the law with violence and incrementally suppress all transgressions of it. Men will naturally insure kin, so create nation states, or at least small local polities in the Swiss model with federal governments providing only reciprocal decidability over inter-state conflicts, and acting as insurer of last resort.
-
The New Right Is the Scientific Right
CONSERVATIVES (ARISTOCRACY) WERE FROZEN IN ANCIENT ARGUMENT THE NEW RIGHT IS THE SCIENTIFIC RIGHT Conservatives were stuck with a moral, religious, traditional set of arguments without themselves understanding why our civilization had ‘sped faster than the rest’. Worse, they bought into the lie just as libertarians bought into the lie of an aristocracy (sovereignty) of everyone. THE NEW RIGHT = SCIENTIFIC RIGHT. The alt right uses ridicule, but by and large the new right differs from the old right in that we now have DATA and we have it from a century of failures with the falsehoods of classical liberalism, and the falsehoods of marxist-postmodernism. My work is just going back to our roots: impose the law with violence and incrementally suppress all transgressions of it. Men will naturally insure kin, so create nation states, or at least small local polities in the Swiss model with federal governments providing only reciprocal decidability over inter-state conflicts, and acting as insurer of last resort.
-
Warriors and Tongue Waggers Liber-Tine/tarian-Ism Is Dead – It Was Always a Lie
Libertarians (libertines) and ancaps are statistically irrelevant. Predisposed to tongue wagging and not to violence necessary to impose rule of law. So the issue here is that libertinism (rothbardianism, ancapism) is dead. And that classical liberalism is largely dead. And that all that can be learned from the failures of the past 350 years, is that markets-in-everything mean that we should have given additional houses to additional classes as they became participatory, and preserved the houses as a market for commons between the classes, and likewise prohibited the production of law (legislation), only contract between the classes under usual contractual terms. We had the perfect government with the Scandianvian and germanic monarchies under sovereignty (rule of law of reciprocity, universal standing, and universal applicability), with the monarch as the judge of last resort, and able to dispense with bureaucracies or the government at a whim. THIS MEANS LIBERTARIANISM IN ALL FORMS WAS ALWAYS A LIE…… Both anglo (classical liberal) and jewish (libertine) were both lies. There is only one law and only one means of imposing it: the organized violence of enough men that the state cannot withstand their revolt.
-
Warriors and Tongue Waggers Liber-Tine/tarian-Ism Is Dead – It Was Always a Lie
Libertarians (libertines) and ancaps are statistically irrelevant. Predisposed to tongue wagging and not to violence necessary to impose rule of law. So the issue here is that libertinism (rothbardianism, ancapism) is dead. And that classical liberalism is largely dead. And that all that can be learned from the failures of the past 350 years, is that markets-in-everything mean that we should have given additional houses to additional classes as they became participatory, and preserved the houses as a market for commons between the classes, and likewise prohibited the production of law (legislation), only contract between the classes under usual contractual terms. We had the perfect government with the Scandianvian and germanic monarchies under sovereignty (rule of law of reciprocity, universal standing, and universal applicability), with the monarch as the judge of last resort, and able to dispense with bureaucracies or the government at a whim. THIS MEANS LIBERTARIANISM IN ALL FORMS WAS ALWAYS A LIE…… Both anglo (classical liberal) and jewish (libertine) were both lies. There is only one law and only one means of imposing it: the organized violence of enough men that the state cannot withstand their revolt.
-
We Must Correct Our Error. We Begin and End with The Militia.
We must discard our belief that sovereignty, reciprocity, monarchies, houses, and an independent jury cannot be improved upon. The uncomfortable truth is that either the militia owns the state, the military owns the state, or the bureaucracy owns the state, or the church(academy) owns the state. Or the financial sector owns the state. The only equality of intersets in that list is the MILITIA. Western civilization begins and ends with the militia. This is how you distinguish between a conservative and a libertarian. Those who fight, and those who preach.
-
We Must Correct Our Error. We Begin and End with The Militia.
We must discard our belief that sovereignty, reciprocity, monarchies, houses, and an independent jury cannot be improved upon. The uncomfortable truth is that either the militia owns the state, the military owns the state, or the bureaucracy owns the state, or the church(academy) owns the state. Or the financial sector owns the state. The only equality of intersets in that list is the MILITIA. Western civilization begins and ends with the militia. This is how you distinguish between a conservative and a libertarian. Those who fight, and those who preach.
-
“We need to set the precedent that if your country dumps a bunch of underclass i
—“We need to set the precedent that if your country dumps a bunch of underclass invaders on ours, we’ll dump something even worse on you…”— Eli Harman
(a) I put that in the constitution.
(b) “if you are exporting bodies you exporting harm, and thereore conducting war”.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-17 14:28:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1008355676190625792
-
“Some of the most obvious ways to ensure opacity of competition rules are religi
—“Some of the most obvious ways to ensure opacity of competition rules are religion, moral, Keynesianism, and legal monopolies. (Production of public goods, a very obnoxious way of slavery for costumers aka people)”—José Francisco Mayora
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-17 14:27:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1008355347516526592