Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • It doesn’t matter. That’s the middle east under the Muslims. It’s the ghettos un

    It doesn’t matter. That’s the middle east under the Muslims. It’s the ghettos under the monarchies. Either you can compete for territory, resources, people, and control in in the market for all of the above, – or you can’t. If you can’t operationally construct one -it’s nonsense.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-07 21:12:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181316335671881728

    Reply addressees: @LLaddon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181282420940791808


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181282420940791808

  • 1 Year AgoEric Danelaw updated his status.Oct 7, 2018, 1:00 PMSOCIETY, POLITY, E

    1 Year AgoEric Danelaw updated his status.Oct 7, 2018, 1:00 PMSOCIETY, POLITY, ECONOMY: ASPECTS OF ORDER

    We use the term Society when referring to norms, traditions, values, and metaphysical assumptions of subjective perception; and Polity when referring to formal institutions of objective perception; and Market when referring to the economics of cooperation. The fact that people do so out of habit without understanding the pattern they refer to, or conflate them for the purposes of suggestion, misrepresentation, or fraud, is merely lack of education in vocabulary and grammar.Updated Oct 7, 2019, 11:25 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-07 11:25:00 UTC

  • RETURN TO COMMUNISM VS NAZIISM AS THE BASIS OF ARGUMENTATIVE EXTREMES by James L

    RETURN TO COMMUNISM VS NAZIISM AS THE BASIS OF ARGUMENTATIVE EXTREMES

    by James Louis LaSalle

    As psychotically obsessed the Left is with racism, Nazis, and white supremacists, the Right should be just as obsessed with communism.

    To the point where we shouldn’t even acknowledge it when they say anything about racism, Nazis, or white supremacists.

    Ignore it completely.

    And don’t even be subtle about it. If a Leftist asks you if you’re a Nazi or some nonsense like that, don’t say a word about it; change the subject to the evils of communism immediately.

    “Are you a Nazi?”

    “Did you know communism was responsible for over 100 million deaths in the 20th century?”

    “What? I asked you if you were a Nazi. Answer the question!”

    “You know, the concept of a “means of production” is a total reification fallacy. It’s the human mind that decides whether things have value or not. That’s why communism is always communal ownership of the means of production in theory and state ownership of human beings in practice. Because human beings ARE the means of production.”

    Leftist: Why do you keep talking about communism? I’m trying to talk to you about the evils of Nazism!

    Rightist: Why don’t you want to talk about the evils of communism? Are you a communist? Do you support communism?

    Play their game against them, and be better at

    it.

    There have been many comments from the usual quarters about the supposed illegitimacy of putting the “alt right” and “antifa” on “the same moral plane.”

    But mostly, Alt-right and Antifa ARE on the same moral plane, the moral plane where you use force to counter an existential threat to you and to your group.

    The main difference is a factual one, not a moral one, in that alt-right represents normalcy to excellence, while Antifa represents defective and inferior people. The former can, in principle, be victorious, while the latter can never be. Even if they, Antifa, communists, degenerates, win, they still lose, because it is not merely superior people against whom they rebel, but the reality of their own inadequacy; which ever remains.

    Once they destroy their betters, antifa will have no one left to parasitize, and they, too, shall perish. Their grasping, covetous, and insatiable appetites are just as real as their inability to satisfy them without seeking discounts at the expense of others, more capable.

    But they have no choice but to try, because meritocracy, accountability, and responsibility in the face of abler competitors would prove just as lethal to them as devouring those finally and completely.

    Without knowing it, without being able to moderate themselves, they are actually trying to straddle these extremes to the only evolutionary strategy that can sustain them, parasitism that is not severe enough to kill their only food source.

    But don’t expect them to realize that. And there is nothing to lose by simply wiping them out, as one would any other species of pest.

    (There is a moral difference between parasites and producers.)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-07 10:28:00 UTC

  • I’m obviously trying to assist in goading him into that leadership. He can do it

    I’m obviously trying to assist in goading him into that leadership. He can do it but I don’t think his personal life can tolerate it, and I’m not sure he has the chops to stick his neck out.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 22:14:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180969502009446400

    Reply addressees: @LLaddon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180964311071625216


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180964311071625216

  • That the swiss model is optimum especially with Rifles, RPGs, Mines, and Nuclear

    That the swiss model is optimum especially with Rifles, RPGs, Mines, and Nuclear Weapons – all territorial denial weapons but impossible to use for aggression – is true, but the mountains serve like england’s seas. But where are you going to get a switzerland without a war?


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 22:11:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180968857864933381

    Reply addressees: @LLaddon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180967942953017344


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @LLaddon The caliphate (Spain), Iceland (Denmark), The free Cities (Holy Roman Empire) and the Pale (Poland, Lithuania, then Russia), America (England), and the 20th (America, Israel), were all borderlands permitted some autonomy by the empire in exchange for taxation.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180967942953017344


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @LLaddon The caliphate (Spain), Iceland (Denmark), The free Cities (Holy Roman Empire) and the Pale (Poland, Lithuania, then Russia), America (England), and the 20th (America, Israel), were all borderlands permitted some autonomy by the empire in exchange for taxation.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180967942953017344

  • There are no arguments for hoppeian defense without the credit capacity of a sta

    There are no arguments for hoppeian defense without the credit capacity of a state to maintain an economy sufficient to produce competitive defense. This has always been the libertarian (rothbardian libertarian at least, and german free city of hoppe) fantasy. Pale vs Free Cities


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 22:03:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180966752349544448

    Reply addressees: @LLaddon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180965762955132930


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180965762955132930

  • I would consider a unified revolt impossible and foolish. However, neither the g

    I would consider a unified revolt impossible and foolish. However, neither the government nor the world thought leadership considers that a threat. Instead a distributed, cyclically self reinforcing conflict – like the one we are seeing evolve every single day. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 21:34:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180959642152837126

    Reply addressees: @LLaddon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180928256884854787


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180928256884854787

  • Of the choices we could make to end the current politio-demographic conflict tur

    Of the choices we could make to end the current politio-demographic conflict turning into civil war includes: (a) multi-ethnicity(genetic homogeneity, (b) multi-culturalism (cultural homogeneity), (c) democratic process (universal access to political power), (d) or political ideology (Dysgenic or Eugenic), the most obvious choice is to end leftism as a political preference, and frustrate the undermining of western civilization.

    And ending leftism is a matter of ending parasitism by law. The rest will follow if leftism isn’t legally possible, and is even illegal speech. The market will serve its purposes.

    Now, I suspect that we will end democratic process as well. And this well end mutli-culturalism. And this will end immigration. But mutli-ethincity would remain, even if by neighborhood, or city, or state, or region.

    My understanding is that without subsidy immigration dries up and reverses. But the urban rich and poor, suburban-rural middle will continue.

    By definancializing the system we restore the balance between urban-high-low vs the middle.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 17:30:00 UTC

  • Revolution Comes

    Revolution Comes.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 14:46:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180856830257455104

    Reply addressees: @mattyglesias

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180856775341481985


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @mattyglesias I don’t make errors. I specialize in Truth, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, and Evolution and the means by which civilizations, states, priests, politicians, intellectuals, classes and individuals engage in their opposites: Lying, Collectivism, and Parasitism, and Dysgenia.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180856775341481985


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @mattyglesias I don’t make errors. I specialize in Truth, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, and Evolution and the means by which civilizations, states, priests, politicians, intellectuals, classes and individuals engage in their opposites: Lying, Collectivism, and Parasitism, and Dysgenia.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180856775341481985

  • This is why the specialization in gambling, drug dealing, prostitution, finance,

    This is why the specialization in gambling, drug dealing, prostitution, finance, legal narrative, signal goods, entertainment, media, and political propaganda especially the inversion and subversion of rule of law by tort we call today’s economics.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 14:42:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180855753936166912

    Reply addressees: @mattyglesias

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180855189584187392


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @mattyglesias The Jewish group strategy is to profit from false promise, baiting into moral hazard, selling envy and conflcit into dysgenia, using Sophism, Supernaturalism, and Pseudoscience, reversing the evolutionary successes of Aristocratic (land owning,hierarchical,meritocratic) peoples.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180855189584187392


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @mattyglesias The Jewish group strategy is to profit from false promise, baiting into moral hazard, selling envy and conflcit into dysgenia, using Sophism, Supernaturalism, and Pseudoscience, reversing the evolutionary successes of Aristocratic (land owning,hierarchical,meritocratic) peoples.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180855189584187392