There is a reason the marxists(lower), libertarians(middle), and neocons(upper) succeeded in undermining western civilization’s rule of law by reciprocity: a vast pool of useful idiots. Don’t advertise your useful idiocy.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-08 17:08:00 UTC
IF YOU WANT A HEAD PRIEST GET A KING OR A POPE
People want a president to serve as a head-priest precisely because they have none. But rule is a purely empirical, purely via-negativa, discipline – suppressing parasitism in all its forms. Governors provide commons we can afford. Priests provide leadership within those limits.
If this division of labor between rule (negative), government (positive), and leadership (counsel) is crossed, then it’s time to pull out the guillotines for those who both demand and supply the imbalance. It’s equal Treason to demand or supply it regardless of one’s class.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-08 15:54:00 UTC
Google cost per soldier per year and go thru the listings. The cost of the salary nothing. the cost per soldier is insane.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-07 22:28:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181335607311847425
Reply addressees: @ocse01
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181335444941877248
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@ocse01 Publications put out every year by various agencies. Total cost of an operation divided by the number of men to carry it out. It’s sounds ridiculous to you because you aren’t in biz where we talk about revenue per employee, cost per employee as comparative profit or efficiency.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1181335444941877248
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@ocse01 Publications put out every year by various agencies. Total cost of an operation divided by the number of men to carry it out. It’s sounds ridiculous to you because you aren’t in biz where we talk about revenue per employee, cost per employee as comparative profit or efficiency.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1181335444941877248
Publications put out every year by various agencies. Total cost of an operation divided by the number of men to carry it out. It’s sounds ridiculous to you because you aren’t in biz where we talk about revenue per employee, cost per employee as comparative profit or efficiency.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-07 22:28:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181335444941877248
Reply addressees: @ocse01
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181332492487258112
IN REPLY TO:
@ocse01
@curtdoolittle no way
where is this figure from
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181332492487258112
I’m not tracking. I’m suggesting that military scale and trade policy, and possibly information policy are necessary means of defense of a people, and that imperial scale is the cheapest means of obtaining it, while locals need only small arms, militias, and a few nukes.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-07 21:41:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181323790837526539
Reply addressees: @LLaddon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181322160759099393
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181322160759099393
But you cannot escape paying for them in money, time, and blood. No free rides. And risk isn’t substitutable.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-07 21:39:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181323081475919873
Reply addressees: @LLaddon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181322916673269760
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@LLaddon I am suggesting a return to european tradition of small states with a central “imperial’ government with no power whatsoever other than military defense of those polities and under the constitution written by strict construction in P-law language. This makes possible your ideals.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1181322916673269760
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@LLaddon I am suggesting a return to european tradition of small states with a central “imperial’ government with no power whatsoever other than military defense of those polities and under the constitution written by strict construction in P-law language. This makes possible your ideals.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1181322916673269760
I am suggesting a return to european tradition of small states with a central “imperial’ government with no power whatsoever other than military defense of those polities and under the constitution written by strict construction in P-law language. This makes possible your ideals.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-07 21:38:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181322916673269760
Reply addressees: @LLaddon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181322466603470849
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@LLaddon I don’t see any evidence that we are not returning to civilizational empires governed by core states, with a multitude of polities within them, necessitated out of military and commercial (trade) power, with decivilized a warfare, and european flexibility in futures is gone.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1181322466603470849
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@LLaddon I don’t see any evidence that we are not returning to civilizational empires governed by core states, with a multitude of polities within them, necessitated out of military and commercial (trade) power, with decivilized a warfare, and european flexibility in futures is gone.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1181322466603470849
yep. It’s because republicans are middle class and democrats are top and bottom against the middle.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-07 21:18:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181317879825928193
Reply addressees: @Nationalist7346
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181308098407010305
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181308098407010305
So state large enough to survive conquest, or empire large enough to defend ‘free states’ but there is no ‘borderland’ left except the arctic.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-07 21:14:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181316951454433282
Reply addressees: @LLaddon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181316335671881728
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@LLaddon It doesn’t matter. That’s the middle east under the Muslims. It’s the ghettos under the monarchies. Either you can compete for territory, resources, people, and control in in the market for all of the above, – or you can’t. If you can’t operationally construct one -it’s nonsense.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1181316335671881728
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@LLaddon It doesn’t matter. That’s the middle east under the Muslims. It’s the ghettos under the monarchies. Either you can compete for territory, resources, people, and control in in the market for all of the above, – or you can’t. If you can’t operationally construct one -it’s nonsense.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1181316335671881728
You can make a switzerland as long as it’s wealthy enough producing enough tax revenue to defend it. You can make many of them. Or you can make many switzerlands and an empirical goverment (monarchy) like England or the HRE and buy many militia and only ONE military.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-07 21:13:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181316744629100544
Reply addressees: @LLaddon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181282420940791808
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181282420940791808