I have a lot of work to do.But Propertarianism’s “Natural Law of Sovereignty”, puts us on equal footing: the missing ‘bible’ of western civ.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 09:07:00 UTC
I have a lot of work to do.But Propertarianism’s “Natural Law of Sovereignty”, puts us on equal footing: the missing ‘bible’ of western civ.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 09:07:00 UTC
Ok. So no, you would’t warranty your accusations with your life, and therefore you admit that you are lying.Right?
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 23:50:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796862571768938502
Reply addressees: @realFurhurts @hannahsm__
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796862333998006272
IN REPLY TO:
@realFurhurts
@curtdoolittle @hannahsm__ Not hard at all. Let me put it this way: I wouldn’t bet my life on ANYTHING a racist, neo-Nazi Eugenicist says.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796862333998006272
You have been a not insignificant contributor to the decline of Anglo-Saxon Contractualism: Rule of Natural, Common, Law.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 22:51:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796847830593863680
Reply addressees: @paulkrugman
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796180480282468352
IN REPLY TO:
@paulkrugman
I truly thought I knew my country better than it turns out I did. I have warned that we could become a failed state, but didn’t realize 1/
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796180480282468352
Productive, Fully informed, Warrantied, Voluntary Transfer, Limited To Productive Externalities. That’s Natural Law:Social Sci,
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 17:10:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796762041205878789
Reply addressees: @paulkrugman
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796729417091444736
IN REPLY TO:
@paulkrugman
Some readers have been reminding me of this, which unfortunately seems relevant https://t.co/KsUtSs8SPi
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796729417091444736
Will you reciprocate and keep all your opinions to yourself?If so, my job is done. Otherwise you’re still polluting the commons.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 16:25:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796750634607321088
Reply addressees: @hannahsm__
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796750304125612032
IN REPLY TO:
@hannahsm__
@curtdoolittle the only cleaning up you should be doing is the cleaning up and disposing of your own opinion. please keep it to yourself.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796750304125612032
I consider it the equivalent of sweeping the street in front of my home or business. It’s a social responsibility to clean up.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 16:22:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796750008762634240
Reply addressees: @hannahsm__
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796749315964276736
IN REPLY TO:
@hannahsm__
@curtdoolittle you’re the one who looks immature. arguing with teenagers? smh go find something better to do with your day.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796749315964276736
#NewRight If you demonstrate none of these, you possess juridical defense, but no influence against your peers, since voting is violence.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 16:05:00 UTC
Stephan made a career out of educating. I’ve made a body of law, and I teach prosecutors. It’s that simple.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 16:00:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796744234363748356
Reply addressees: @Rocky_Bukkake @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796740663299538944
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796740663299538944
Stephan argues MORAL CHOICE, and I argue LEGAL LIMITS. His Golden rule and my Silver. But it’s the same msg.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 15:54:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796742762372730880
Reply addressees: @Rocky_Bukkake @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796740663299538944
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796740663299538944
PROPERTARIAN NATURAL LAW IS JUST ‘EASIER’
Humor aside, Strictly Constructed Propertarian Law is soooo much easier to adjudicate than all the accidents of error and malice that constitute current law.
Simple law is good law. Natural Law is a simple law. Becuase it uses very simple decidability.
The problem then is only ‘who to believe’.
Most of the time, that’s the main issue in court.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 09:32:00 UTC