Curt Doolittle

Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity

  • )

    😉

    https://propertarianism.com/2016/11/02/might-makes-right-by-righting-wrongs-a-declaration/

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-02 14:38:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/793824526010167296

    Reply addressees: @daemoskisame @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/793799732149747712

    IN REPLY TO:

    @DaemosKisame

    @curtdoolittle @realDonaldTrump to bad you dont have might or right you just back the guy who promises to cover assault charges for fans 😉

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/793799732149747712

  • MIGHT MAKES RIGHT BY RIGHTING LEFT WRONGS 😉 A DECLARATION OF RESTORATION. #newr

    MIGHT MAKES RIGHT BY RIGHTING LEFT WRONGS 😉 A DECLARATION OF RESTORATION. #newright #tcot #tlot #conservative #NRx
    https://propertarianism.com/2016/11/02/might-makes-right-by-righting-wrongs-a-declaration/ https://t.co/lX0fUfuHJQ

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-02 14:37:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/793824294698569728

  • Might Makes Right By Righting Wrongs – A Declaration

    MightMakesRight By Righting Wrongs – A Declaration of Reformation (get image version , or get  PDF Version ) Might, in and of itself, does not determine right or wrong. But right is always, and must be, constructed by the use of or constraint of might. Those with might determine whether a condition of right or wrong exists or not. Everyone else merely has the permission of those with might. And when a series of abuses and usurpations pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under other’s discretion, thereby depriving them of their Sovereignty, it is those with might that can restore their Sovereignty over the objections of those who lack the might. All revolutions in history are caused by a minority of men willing to use their might to change the status quo. And it is the virtue of our ancient Anglo-Saxon system of contractual government that allows redress of those abuses through restoration of that Sovereignty; and to restore it by the revision of that common contract between those with might: the Constitution – under which they agree to reserve their might and defer to tradition, norm, legislation, and Natural Law of Sovereign men. And by that revision alter the institutions and laws that govern all actions thereunder, restoring their Sovereignty. And because it is in the nature of all humans in all organizations of all scales, to seek power to circumvent the limits of their productivity, and to extract from others and others kin, their normative, cultural, institutional, informational, material, and territorial capital, by the circumvention of that Natural Law and by abuse that Sovereignty – then those with might must periodically revise that constitution through the use of might, just as we revise legislation through the proxy of might we call the legislature; and just as we revise the common law through the proxy of might we call the courts; just as we revise the current relations with outsiders by the direct use of might by means of information, conversion, immigration, economic and material warfare. There is only one judgment history lays upon us: persistence of one’s kin by survival, invention, adaptation, and competition. Might used to make Sovereignty is well judged by man’s history and nature’s laws. Because it is by that very Sovereignty that the western man dragged all mankind out of superstition, mysticism, pseudoscience, ignorance, poverty, disease, and dysgenia – kicking and screaming all the while – one calamitous conflict of tribe, nation, state, religion, and civilization at a time. A series of Conflicts through which the Sovereign continue to persevere, and by our might and Sovereignty shall continue to do so.

    — Curt Doolittle, The Philosophy of Aristocracy, The Propertarian Institute

  • Might Makes Right By Righting Wrongs – A Declaration

    MightMakesRight By Righting Wrongs – A Declaration of Reformation (get image version , or get  PDF Version ) Might, in and of itself, does not determine right or wrong. But right is always, and must be, constructed by the use of or constraint of might. Those with might determine whether a condition of right or wrong exists or not. Everyone else merely has the permission of those with might. And when a series of abuses and usurpations pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under other’s discretion, thereby depriving them of their Sovereignty, it is those with might that can restore their Sovereignty over the objections of those who lack the might. All revolutions in history are caused by a minority of men willing to use their might to change the status quo. And it is the virtue of our ancient Anglo-Saxon system of contractual government that allows redress of those abuses through restoration of that Sovereignty; and to restore it by the revision of that common contract between those with might: the Constitution – under which they agree to reserve their might and defer to tradition, norm, legislation, and Natural Law of Sovereign men. And by that revision alter the institutions and laws that govern all actions thereunder, restoring their Sovereignty. And because it is in the nature of all humans in all organizations of all scales, to seek power to circumvent the limits of their productivity, and to extract from others and others kin, their normative, cultural, institutional, informational, material, and territorial capital, by the circumvention of that Natural Law and by abuse that Sovereignty – then those with might must periodically revise that constitution through the use of might, just as we revise legislation through the proxy of might we call the legislature; and just as we revise the common law through the proxy of might we call the courts; just as we revise the current relations with outsiders by the direct use of might by means of information, conversion, immigration, economic and material warfare. There is only one judgment history lays upon us: persistence of one’s kin by survival, invention, adaptation, and competition. Might used to make Sovereignty is well judged by man’s history and nature’s laws. Because it is by that very Sovereignty that the western man dragged all mankind out of superstition, mysticism, pseudoscience, ignorance, poverty, disease, and dysgenia – kicking and screaming all the while – one calamitous conflict of tribe, nation, state, religion, and civilization at a time. A series of Conflicts through which the Sovereign continue to persevere, and by our might and Sovereignty shall continue to do so.

    — Curt Doolittle, The Philosophy of Aristocracy, The Propertarian Institute

  • Might in and of itself may not make right. But all right is made by the use or r

    Might in and of itself may not make right. But all right is made by the use or restraint of might. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-02 12:57:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/793799231224045568

    Reply addressees: @daemoskisame @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/793771124584751104

    IN REPLY TO:

    @DaemosKisame

    @curtdoolittle @realDonaldTrump so what your saying is. WAAAH I WANT IF I DONT GET MY WAY IMMA THROW A FIT LIKE A LIL BITCH WAH GIMME BOTTLE

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/793771124584751104

  • Actually what I’m saying is, that those who can destroy a thing, own a thing.All

    Actually what I’m saying is, that those who can destroy a thing, own a thing.All else is at their permission.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-02 12:56:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/793799005444665345

    Reply addressees: @daemoskisame @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/793771124584751104

    IN REPLY TO:

    @DaemosKisame

    @curtdoolittle @realDonaldTrump so what your saying is. WAAAH I WANT IF I DONT GET MY WAY IMMA THROW A FIT LIKE A LIL BITCH WAH GIMME BOTTLE

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/793771124584751104

  • Which is superior morality? Objective morality of Natural Law, Normative Moralit

    Which is superior morality? Objective morality of Natural Law, Normative Morality, or legislative command?

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-31 15:21:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/793110630509182976

    Reply addressees: @LilDocCollins @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/793078348566056960

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/793078348566056960

  • AN APPEAL TO NATURAL LAW IS NOT A NATURALISTIC FALLACY. (from a friend) —“Curt

    AN APPEAL TO NATURAL LAW IS NOT A NATURALISTIC FALLACY.

    (from a friend)

    —“Curt: Do you consider an appeal to nature to be a fallacy? I spoke to a woman recently about how xenoestrogens in plastics dramatically reduced the testosterone levels in men, after which she responded with a resonating “So what? Why does it matter if men become less masculine?” …. I am bothered by the fact that this apparent “fallacy” exists, since it seems completely counter-evolutionary and consequently destructive. It is indeed possible that we could feminize our men through chemical transformation, just as we could masculinize our women through chemical transformation.”— (A Friend)

    RESPONSE

    The question is whether we would survive competition from those who feminized their women and masculinized their men.

    And the evidence at present is that women have feminized our men through institutions and propaganda, spread vast increases of mental health issues, and empowered out enemies to conquer us.

    And while a woman may say ‘this is ok, we are no better than they’, a man may equally say, then if they are my genetic enemies, my cultural enemies, and you wold empower them, then why is it that you are not my enemy, and I should not return you to silence, physical punishment, virtual slavery, limited to your home, lacking legal and political standing, and subject the wit and whim of me and mine?

    This is what the Islamists pursue, so if they are no better than we, then why should I and mine not pursue it against you and yours?

    You see, our reproductive and strategic differences are in competition, and we compromise only because it is of mutual benefit to us men, and to our daughters, to offer you that compromise. But if you choose to break that compromise, there is literally nothing you can do without strong men to rally to your aid, to stop us from returning you to submission and slavery.

    So it is not a matter of nature. it is a matter of compromise. Natural Law does not appeal to natural behavior of some kind but of demonstrated interest in cooperating. In other words, it is an appeal to incentives to continue the status quo, or to discontinue the status quo and create another more suitable to our interests.

    Either we are engaged in compromise by voluntary exchange, or we are not. If we are not and we cause each other no harm, then that is one thing. But if we are not and you cause me harm, the you must realize that we are stronger, faster, smarter, more violent, higher risk, and that this world that you enjoy was built not because of you free riders, but because we wished to attract our women and please our daughters, rather than merely purchase and enslave them. There are vast regions of this world where men still enslave women, and the only people working to stop them are white men.

    If I want to beat you how can you stop me? You cannot. Only men can. So will you trade compromise with me, or shall I return you to the herd where we domesticated you, by force of violence.

    But there are no conditions under which we will tolerate the genocide of our race because our women choose to conspire against us.

    ie: natural law = trade.

    Neither of us are completely satisfied, but we are as satisfied as we can both be without causing the dissatisfaction of the other.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-30 15:27:00 UTC

  • NO. CAPITALISM IS NOT AN UNLIMITED GOOD. THERE ARE NO UNLIMITED GOODS. There is

    NO. CAPITALISM IS NOT AN UNLIMITED GOOD. THERE ARE NO UNLIMITED GOODS.

    There is no higher order by which to govern than Natural Law.

    Under Natural Law we have domesticated all mankind.

    But rule by credit and redistribution is regressive.

    Becuase rule of law mandates only limitations.

    Rule by Credit and Redistribution is merely a return to slavery by other means

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-30 11:15:00 UTC

  • Simple Rules for Participating In The Civic Society: Don’t do anything by action

    Simple Rules for Participating In The Civic Society:

    Don’t do anything by action, word, or appearance, to attract attention in the vicinity of white people. Don’t disrespect a person that isn’t attracting attention by action, word, or appearance, in the presence of white people. This is our means of demonstration of mutual respect despite our biological and cultural differences. Conversely, absolutely positively disrespect a person who attracts attention in the presence of white people, and absolutely attract attention when disrespected by white people when not attracting attention in the presence of white people. White people are aware of and take responsibility for the maintenance of every investment within their range of perception: behavioral, material, and aesthetic. This is why they prosper. Few other civilizations can manage this discipline. One cannot have the benefits of white civilization without the white radius of responsibility. Do not poison the well from which you drink. Including the white lower classes who whites struggle to maintain as well.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-30 09:52:00 UTC