Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity

  • No. Science Is A Moral Discipline Within Natural Law: The Means By Which We Warrant The Truthfulness Of Our Statements.

    (Ethelbert, Jesus, and Kant say the same thing) The languages of science(testimony), physical science, propertarianism (social science), natural law (science of dispute resolution), accounting, finance, and economics, (measurement of production), function as the universal language of truth-telling.

    The discipline of science asks us to warranty that we have performed due diligence on our statements. We warranty that we have eliminated error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, pseudoscience, and deceit from our utterances. That’s what science is: A NATURAL LAW: a warranty of our information, just like the warranty of our services, just as the warranty of our products, just as the warranty of our speech. Period. End of story. I know. You thought you were smart. You were so proud that you had transcended superstition. But it never occurred to you that you were just as ridiculous in the present generation due to the pseudosciences of Marx, Freud, Boaz, Adorno than your superstitious ancestors were in the pseudoscience of theology. Ok. Have we got that straight? Look in the mirror. Repeat after me: “I was suckered by pseudoscience, just like my ancestors were suckered by superstition. I am a sucker. I pledge not to be a sucker any longer. There is only one moral rule in both silver(negative) and gold (positive) forms: Impose not cost upon the cost born by others, by limiting yourself to actions and words, consisting only of productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer, limited to productive externalities. Ethelbert (Anglo-Saxon Silver Rule), Jesus (Golden-Rule), and Kant (bi-metal rule), all said the same thing. Everything else is lies to justify theft and to circumvent voluntary transfers between individuals classes and groups. Ok. We’re done here. “Please stop torturing me with your postmodern superstitions, ok?. Thanks, -The Management.” Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy
  • No. Science Is A Moral Discipline Within Natural Law: The Means By Which We Warrant The Truthfulness Of Our Statements.

    (Ethelbert, Jesus, and Kant say the same thing) The languages of science(testimony), physical science, propertarianism (social science), natural law (science of dispute resolution), accounting, finance, and economics, (measurement of production), function as the universal language of truth-telling.

    The discipline of science asks us to warranty that we have performed due diligence on our statements. We warranty that we have eliminated error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, pseudoscience, and deceit from our utterances. That’s what science is: A NATURAL LAW: a warranty of our information, just like the warranty of our services, just as the warranty of our products, just as the warranty of our speech. Period. End of story. I know. You thought you were smart. You were so proud that you had transcended superstition. But it never occurred to you that you were just as ridiculous in the present generation due to the pseudosciences of Marx, Freud, Boaz, Adorno than your superstitious ancestors were in the pseudoscience of theology. Ok. Have we got that straight? Look in the mirror. Repeat after me: “I was suckered by pseudoscience, just like my ancestors were suckered by superstition. I am a sucker. I pledge not to be a sucker any longer. There is only one moral rule in both silver(negative) and gold (positive) forms: Impose not cost upon the cost born by others, by limiting yourself to actions and words, consisting only of productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer, limited to productive externalities. Ethelbert (Anglo-Saxon Silver Rule), Jesus (Golden-Rule), and Kant (bi-metal rule), all said the same thing. Everything else is lies to justify theft and to circumvent voluntary transfers between individuals classes and groups. Ok. We’re done here. “Please stop torturing me with your postmodern superstitions, ok?. Thanks, -The Management.” Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy
  • War and Motherhood are Unsubstitutable Goods

    If you claim you are unique, and your life unique, and therefore of value out of uniqueness, then defense is not substitutable. Period. That’s the end of the free riding on defense, disaster, emergency services. You either fight, restore, and react, or you are a free rider. The problem herein is that women cannot fight without causing risk to the men, and risk to generations. A woman’s equivalent of fighting, restoring and reacting is child bearing. If a woman will not bear replacement children and a man will not bear the costs of defense, then they are free riding parasites on those who bear and those who defend. This is not an opinion. This is merely a fact of physical reality.

  • War and Motherhood are Unsubstitutable Goods

    If you claim you are unique, and your life unique, and therefore of value out of uniqueness, then defense is not substitutable. Period. That’s the end of the free riding on defense, disaster, emergency services. You either fight, restore, and react, or you are a free rider. The problem herein is that women cannot fight without causing risk to the men, and risk to generations. A woman’s equivalent of fighting, restoring and reacting is child bearing. If a woman will not bear replacement children and a man will not bear the costs of defense, then they are free riding parasites on those who bear and those who defend. This is not an opinion. This is merely a fact of physical reality.

  • If the we regulated the informational commons by requiring we warranty our speec

    If the we regulated the informational commons by requiring we warranty our speech, then the NYT and Academy, would be organized crime orgs.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-16 12:14:00 UTC

  • (not that i like this idea, but under propertarian ethics, testimonial truth, an

    (not that i like this idea, but under propertarian ethics, testimonial truth, and natural law, the NYT, and a lot of the academy, are classifiable as organized crime.)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-16 11:40:00 UTC

  • If you claim you are unique, and your life unique, and therefore of value out of

    If you claim you are unique, and your life unique, and therefore of value out of uniqueness, then defense is not substitutable. Period. That’s the end of the free riding on defense, disaster, emergency services. You either fight, restore, and react, or you are a free rider.

    The problem herein is that women cannot fight without causing risk to the men, and risk to generations. A woman’s equivalent of fighting, restoring and reacting is child bearing. If a woman will not bear replacement children and a man will not bear the costs of defense, then they are free riding parasites on those who bear and those who defend.

    This is not an opinion. This is merely a fact of physical reality.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-16 09:18:00 UTC

  • So why is it that one hates thieves? We don’t. We just want thieves to stop thie

    So why is it that one hates thieves? We don’t. We just want thieves to stop thieving.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-15 18:02:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/798586951687426054

    Reply addressees: @_DanielleBasile

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/798586615878664192


    IN REPLY TO:

    @presumablyvi

    @curtdoolittle Where did the equivalence between hatred and theft prevention come from?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/798586615878664192

  • You can’t claim an opportunity as your property. You can only claim converted op

    You can’t claim an opportunity as your property. You can only claim converted opportunities as your property.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-15 12:24:00 UTC

  • THE CORE The Evolution of Cooperation

    https://propertarianism.com/2014/09/28/the-evolution-of-cooperation/PROPERTARIANISM: THE CORE

    The Evolution of Cooperation


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-14 07:49:00 UTC