Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity

  • All murderers, thieves, and parasites are sincere in their murder, parasitism, a

    All murderers, thieves, and parasites are sincere in their murder, parasitism, and thievery.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-26 01:19:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/802320946740793344

    Reply addressees: @digitalErmit @VonMacht @Salon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/802312726286475264


    IN REPLY TO:

    @digitalErmit

    @curtdoolittle @VonMacht @Salon I’m not educated enough on them to tell. Now, I believe some of them were sincere and thoughtful.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/802312726286475264

  • MORE NON-AGGRESSION FALLACY SUPPRESSION —-“1. Against someone who initiates ag

    MORE NON-AGGRESSION FALLACY SUPPRESSION

    —-“1. Against someone who initiates aggression.”—-

    (libertarian fallacy by suggestion)

    It’s like saying the sky is blue. Aggress is a verb. like “act”. Its meaningless unless you define the noun that functions as the predicate: the scope of what we tolerate retaliation against aggressions against.

    The fact that so many people are suckers for this rhetorical fallacy says volumes about human cognitive bias. Aggression = Bad, non Aggression=Good, but only if you are in kindergarten.

    The problem of ethics lies in determining what empirically causes people to retaliate no matter what we agree to, what normative contracts we invest in, and what commons we invest in, and of those three categories, what transgressions they will insure by formal punishment, formal restitution, formal penalty, informal boycott or disassociation, informal shaming, or interpersonal shaming.

    Another strange cognitive bias is the common impulse that the subject matter (conflict resolution) that has empirically driven the evolution of the common law of torts for over two thousand years; is the origin of philosophical reason in the ancient world, rationalism in the medieval, empiricism in the modern, and science of late, should somehow be a matter of personal introspection by the common folk rather than empirical science by masters of the craft.

    In other words, why does the average person feel capable of issuing pronouncements on ethics any more than structural engineering, the structure of space time, protein folding or algebraic geometry?

    Yet we know the reason: because we are not trying to discover the truth when we speak of ethics. We did not evolve to tell the truth, or science would not have taken us over two thousand years to develop. Instead, our genes are telling us to negotiate, influence, and lie on their behalf. And we are faithful servants of their influences.

    Man is a rational animal. He is not moral or immoral but moral or immoral when it suits him. And his definition of ‘moral’ is whatever suits his reproductive strategy at the moment. This is why genders and classes, nations, tribes and races all state that moral truths favor their genetic advancement over the genetic advancement of others.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-25 18:09:00 UTC

  • Cooperation: the study of voluntary, inconstant, and reciprocal relations

    Cooperation: the study of voluntary, inconstant, and reciprocal relations


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-25 10:13:00 UTC

  • Physical Laws, Natural Laws, Information Laws.

    LAWS OF NATURE, NATURAL LAW, AND LAWS OF INFORMATION 1) Laws of nature (physical laws) and 2) Natural laws (laws of cooperation), and 3) Truth (laws of information) consist of a spectrum dependent upon each other.

  • Physical Laws, Natural Laws, Information Laws.

    LAWS OF NATURE, NATURAL LAW, AND LAWS OF INFORMATION 1) Laws of nature (physical laws) and 2) Natural laws (laws of cooperation), and 3) Truth (laws of information) consist of a spectrum dependent upon each other.

  • ( If you thought islam was messianic and aggressive, wait until you see Part VII

    ( If you thought islam was messianic and aggressive, wait until you see Part VIII of The Law of Nature. …talk about retaliation… )


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-24 18:17:00 UTC

  • The Restoration: The Secret Of Western Civilization: Propertarianism In A Nutshell

    (propertarianism core) We can restore the west’s evolutionary trajectory as the principle source of mankind’s innovation, restore our people and our civilization, and overthrow a century and a half of pseudoscience, by restoring to the common law the organizing principle of sovereignty – and consequential markets in everything, with just one law: truthful speech by the involuntary warranty of due diligence against error, bias, suggestion, obscurantism, pseudoscience and deceit, for the purpose of circumventing a voluntary, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange, limited to productive externalities, by the imposition of costs against property in toto: that broad spectrum of things, relationships, behaviors, and commons, which we have borne costs to inventory, without imposing costs upon the things, behaviors, and commons of others. This warranty is achieved by proofs (demonstrations) of consistency in 1) categorical consistency, 2) internal consistency, 3) empirical consistency, 4) existential consistency, 5) moral consistency, 6) scope consistency. And while it might take a small effort to learn how to provide these warranties on all information, just as we have learned to provide warranties on products, warranties on services, and limited warranties on the reporting of basic research, we can complete the scientific method and require these proofs on all information. In every era we invent new expansions of the method of cooperation we call the division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor, and advocacy. But in doing so we create greater asymmetries of knowledge, and therefore new opportunities to invent means of benefitting from the imposition of costs upon others that we call ‘parasitism’. And we rely upon courts, testimony, jury, judge, empirical truth, and the accumulated empirical knowledge of the common law of torts, to incrementally suppress and render illegal each innovation in parasitism as soon as the first case adjudicated is recorded for reference by other lawyers, prosecutors, and judges. The west was not first, nor wealthiest, nor possessed of greater numbers, superior resources, superior climate. But instead, by accident of circumstance, chose Sovereignty as their principle of organization – a choice which is possible only under empirical, testimonial speech we call ‘truth’, and a market for the resolution of any negotiation, exchange, or conflict – depriving all of authority over anything other than the preservation of sovereignty. Europeans created the distributed dictatorship of sovereign men, open to any man willing and able to reciprocally insure every other against violations of his sovereignty. This choice resulted in a civilization that calculates advancements faster than all other organizing models, and produces the least opportunity for parasitism and rents. And it is this velocity in the ancient and modern worlds that has allowed the west to defeat the red queen of corruption, and drag mankind kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, mysticism, justificationism, conflationism, deception, hunger, poverty, physical labor, cellular decay, disease, and increasingly, the vicissitudes of nature, in an unforgiving universe hostile to life in all but the rarest of exceptions.

  • Yeah.. this is right. 1) Physical Law (Laws of Nature) 2) Natural Law (Law of Co

    Yeah.. this is right.

    1) Physical Law (Laws of Nature)

    2) Natural Law (Law of Cooperation)

    3) Testimonial Law (Law of Information)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-23 19:31:00 UTC

  • We had it right with heroic paganism (hero worship, nature worship), houses for

    We had it right with heroic paganism (hero worship, nature worship), houses for each class, and the common natural law.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-18 13:58:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/799612833432539136

    Reply addressees: @PeanutArbuckle

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/799611745971081216


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/799611745971081216

  • eh… not true. Aristotle>Stoics>Romans>Scholastics>Locke/etc Principle = Min. N

    eh… not true. Aristotle>Stoics>Romans>Scholastics>Locke/etc Principle = Min. Necessary for Peaceful Cooperation.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-17 19:59:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/799341240152100868

    Reply addressees: @BulgakovsPilot

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/799322683590766592


    IN REPLY TO:

    @BulgakovsPilot

    @curtdoolittle Difficult to define.I’m curious as to why natural law lingers in poli thought despite it being non-existent pre-enlightenment

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/799322683590766592