Curt Doolittle

Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity

  • INHERENT RIGHTS ARE LOGICALLY AND PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE Natural Law describes NE

    INHERENT RIGHTS ARE LOGICALLY AND PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE

    Natural Law describes NECESSARY rights. We can’t possibly posses ‘inherent’ rights, since all rights consist of claims against (demands against) others. Since a claim or demand from others can only exist in a contract or agreement, and that the term ‘right’ is only possible when appealing to a third party – we can on say we NEED these rights inherently, as human beings, but not that we possess them. That’s impossible. It’s physically and logically impossible. So if we describe natural law as inherently possessed rather than inherently required, we attempt an act of fraud: which is to ignore the very simple fact that to obtain rights of any kind requires that we exchange them with others, and that we insure them, and at any scale, that we pay an insurer to insure them for all of us (judiciary). Any statement of inherently possessed rights is an act of fraud whereby the individual seeks claims against others without entering into a contract for exchange, and preferably, both with a third party insurer that renders asymmetry of violence neutral.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-23 11:21:00 UTC

  • INTRO TO PROPERTARIANISM Depends on what you want out of it. Do you want to unde

    https://propertarianism.com/basic-concepts/NEWBIES: INTRO TO PROPERTARIANISM

    Depends on what you want out of it.

    Do you want to understand what propertarianism is sort of ‘about’?

    Do you want to understand why the west evolved faster than the rest?

    Do you want to now how we can save western civilization – easily?

    Do you want to win arguments against the “bad” people?

    Do you want to construct ‘proofs’ of natural law?

    Do you want to contribute to this natural law?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-22 12:23:00 UTC

  • so far I have only seen one guy who could write an ‘idiots guide’ to propertaria

    so far I have only seen one guy who could write an ‘idiots guide’ to propertarianism. he’s young. he’s not got enough confidence. we need to somehow get him to do it.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-22 08:47:00 UTC

  • ON USURY: VIOLATIONS OF RECIPROCITY When moral interest violates natural law of

    ON USURY: VIOLATIONS OF RECIPROCITY

    When moral interest violates natural law of reciprocity:

    1 – natural law requires reciprocity

    2 – natural law requires that neither borrower or lender may externalize costs (to the transaction).

    3 – the individual with asymmetric power is the lender, and bears equal responsibility in selecting opportunities for interest as does the borrower bear responsibility for repaying the loan.

    4 – There is no difference in fault between selecting an incapable borrower, and borrowing an amount one is incapable of paying. This violates reciprocity.

    5 – The limit of restitution is determined by the amount of the original loan, minus the payments against it, else cost are externalized beyond the transaction.

    6 – Once in default, the contract is broken, and we have evidence of both the failure of borrower and lender to conduct due diligence, and therefore

    7 – the lender is never due interest (reward) for bad lending, any more than the borrower is due returns for the use of what he borrowed to use in production. So in the case of the original amount, we are referring to the amount not the amount plus interest.

    8 – for this reason my understanding is that principle should be paid off first, and interest following, in all honest transactions. And statements otherwise exist entirely to obtain unearned profits.

    I could write about this all day long but I have other things to do…. reciprocity means borrower and lender bear equal responsibility, else we empower lenders to search out the incompetent in order to obtain through defaults that which they could not obtain through the selection of productive opportunities that cause no negative externality.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-21 09:03:00 UTC

  • The Cult of Non Submission The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Natural Law of Sove

    The Cult of Non Submission

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Natural Law of Sovereign Men

    The Institutional Production of Human Agency

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-20 20:43:00 UTC

  • Natural Law, and the Grammar of Operational Language

    NATURAL LAW AND THE GRAMMAR OF OPERATIONALISM (propertarianism core)(important) Operationalism like any legal language, or programming language, is grammatically burdensome. It requires you to take your sentence structure to the next level of abstraction and exit the passive voice entirely, as well as all use of the verb to-be. So, as a language, it requires more planning. Just like english requires more planning than other languages do already. For most people it will be easier if you jot your ideas down however they occur to you, then translate them in to operational language. Doing so will show you HOW LITTLE YOU KNOW about what it is that you THINK you know. Furthermore it prevents OTHERS from claiming that they know something before audiences less skilled and informed as you are. If you translate your work into operational language it will not take very long before you start to write that way habitually. EXPLANATION Language is actually a pretty weak construct compared to visualization. We must serially construct context and description out of shared meaning, and then constantly correct for perceived misinterpretation, incomprehension, and our own error. Use of the passive voice is intuitive because it places the subject (which is precise) at the beginning of the sentence rather than the verb (actions) which are more general and less contextual. And when we speak in operational language it is the VERBS that take precedence, and the nouns serve only as context for the verbs. So it is counter – intuitive to be very specific about the verbs which are general. Usually we build context out of nouns, and related and color them with verbs and pronouns. But in Operationalism we are (counter intuitively and verbally burdensomely), describing a sequence of actions with greater import than the nouns. THE OPERATIONALIST GRAMMAR actor, incentive, action, noun, change in state, result, actor, incentive, action, noun, change in state, result actor, incentive, action, noun, change in state, result actor, incentive, action, noun, change in state, result actor, incentive, action, noun, change in state, result actor, incentive, action, noun, change in state, result actor, incentive, action, noun, change in state, result actor, incentive, action, noun, change in state, result actor, incentive, action, noun, change in state, result actor, incentive, action, noun, change in state, result actor, incentive, action, noun, change in state, result actor, incentive, action, noun, change in state, result “The people, ever desirous of {A}, take actions {B}, upon these contexts {C}, to produce {D} change in state, thereby attempting to possess {E}, including externalities {F}, which we can judge as objectively G (moral, amoral, immoral or true, undecidable, false). In propertarianism (Natural Law), we have the full set of knowledge to work with and therefore a complete LANGUAGE to work with: psychology(acquisitionism), epistemology, ethics (property in toto), politics, aesthetics, and GRAMMAR. FROM ARGUMENT TO LAW If you add just a few requirements to that grammar, you get formal law constructed from natural law. {terms and definitions } -We … (who) -Whereas we have observed … (definition of state ) -Whereas we desire … (definition of desired state) -We propose …. (series of actions to change state) and we argue …. (how the desired state, the propositions, do not violate the one law of reciprocity.) -Even though this argument is dependent upon … (prior laws) and would be reversed if (prior laws were falsified, or conditions had changed), -And we warranty this argument by ( skin in the game ). -Signed …. -Juried …. …. -Adjudicated. …. …. …. -Recorded. This is an incremental improvement to the natural, common, judge discovered law of anglo saxons that Jefferson attempted to formalize in the US constitution. Our chief function is to incrementally improve that natural law to include the lessons we have learned from over two hundred years of the american experience, in yet another improvement over the hundreds of years of the english experience, and thousands of years of the various germanic, latin, greek, and aryan european traditions. We must correct: The errors of the enlightenment visions of man, the corruption of that document of natural law in the post civil war period by the aggression of the north against the south, and the introduction into that document of amendments that violate natural law. The attempt to defeat meritocratic aristocracy by the invention of a pseudoscientific religion by the cosmopolitan Jews: Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor, Mises, the Frankfurt School. The industrialization of deception under mass media, the alliance of finance, commerce, media, academy, and state, to exploit the middle and working classes to pay for the votes of the underclasses, the use of mass immigration of underclasses once their pseudoscientific, pseudorational, and pseudo-moral attempts at overthrow of the civlization had failed. And the intentional undermining of our constitution of natural law, our education systems, our history and our culture, our civic society, our family as the central object of policy, and our ancient aesthetics, and even our most sacred universal requirement for truthful speech regardless of the consequences. And the extraction of wealth from our people by the sale of shares in the economy at interest in order to generate consumption, rather than direct distribution of shares to individual citizens and forcing industry, finance, and state to compete for them – the virtual enslavement of our people. And lastly, the genocide that has been conducted against the white race in order to exterminate the aristocratic civilization by the middle eastern peoples despite having dragged humanity out of ignorance, superstition, hunger, disease, and poverty. All of this is possible by amending and thereby restoring this constitution, and restoring and preserving the ancient rights of anglo saxons and their ancestors: Sovereignty. The Cult of Non Submission. WE WERE FORGED BY TRUTH By the first principle of sovereignty, we were forced to discover and use deflationary truth in everything we have done for thousands of years. We can restore our people by the simple act of restoring truth, non-parasitism, and duty: every man a sheriff, and warrior. This is terribly easy to do. People do not have to believe a law that enforces reciprocity. They need only pursue their own interests and use that law to create reciprocity. And the central problem of our age is the destruction of our families by financial parasitism, international parasitism, and the industrialization of deceit. APOLOGIES I am sorry that this didn’t occur to me earlier. I didn’t realize how helpful it was to state what I considered to be obvious. If you write in the above grammar without the verb to be, you can construct most arguments. Curt Doolittle

  • Natural Law, and the Grammar of Operational Language

    NATURAL LAW AND THE GRAMMAR OF OPERATIONALISM (propertarianism core)(important) Operationalism like any legal language, or programming language, is grammatically burdensome. It requires you to take your sentence structure to the next level of abstraction and exit the passive voice entirely, as well as all use of the verb to-be. So, as a language, it requires more planning. Just like english requires more planning than other languages do already. For most people it will be easier if you jot your ideas down however they occur to you, then translate them in to operational language. Doing so will show you HOW LITTLE YOU KNOW about what it is that you THINK you know. Furthermore it prevents OTHERS from claiming that they know something before audiences less skilled and informed as you are. If you translate your work into operational language it will not take very long before you start to write that way habitually. EXPLANATION Language is actually a pretty weak construct compared to visualization. We must serially construct context and description out of shared meaning, and then constantly correct for perceived misinterpretation, incomprehension, and our own error. Use of the passive voice is intuitive because it places the subject (which is precise) at the beginning of the sentence rather than the verb (actions) which are more general and less contextual. And when we speak in operational language it is the VERBS that take precedence, and the nouns serve only as context for the verbs. So it is counter – intuitive to be very specific about the verbs which are general. Usually we build context out of nouns, and related and color them with verbs and pronouns. But in Operationalism we are (counter intuitively and verbally burdensomely), describing a sequence of actions with greater import than the nouns. THE OPERATIONALIST GRAMMAR actor, incentive, action, noun, change in state, result, actor, incentive, action, noun, change in state, result actor, incentive, action, noun, change in state, result actor, incentive, action, noun, change in state, result actor, incentive, action, noun, change in state, result actor, incentive, action, noun, change in state, result actor, incentive, action, noun, change in state, result actor, incentive, action, noun, change in state, result actor, incentive, action, noun, change in state, result actor, incentive, action, noun, change in state, result actor, incentive, action, noun, change in state, result actor, incentive, action, noun, change in state, result “The people, ever desirous of {A}, take actions {B}, upon these contexts {C}, to produce {D} change in state, thereby attempting to possess {E}, including externalities {F}, which we can judge as objectively G (moral, amoral, immoral or true, undecidable, false). In propertarianism (Natural Law), we have the full set of knowledge to work with and therefore a complete LANGUAGE to work with: psychology(acquisitionism), epistemology, ethics (property in toto), politics, aesthetics, and GRAMMAR. FROM ARGUMENT TO LAW If you add just a few requirements to that grammar, you get formal law constructed from natural law. {terms and definitions } -We … (who) -Whereas we have observed … (definition of state ) -Whereas we desire … (definition of desired state) -We propose …. (series of actions to change state) and we argue …. (how the desired state, the propositions, do not violate the one law of reciprocity.) -Even though this argument is dependent upon … (prior laws) and would be reversed if (prior laws were falsified, or conditions had changed), -And we warranty this argument by ( skin in the game ). -Signed …. -Juried …. …. -Adjudicated. …. …. …. -Recorded. This is an incremental improvement to the natural, common, judge discovered law of anglo saxons that Jefferson attempted to formalize in the US constitution. Our chief function is to incrementally improve that natural law to include the lessons we have learned from over two hundred years of the american experience, in yet another improvement over the hundreds of years of the english experience, and thousands of years of the various germanic, latin, greek, and aryan european traditions. We must correct: The errors of the enlightenment visions of man, the corruption of that document of natural law in the post civil war period by the aggression of the north against the south, and the introduction into that document of amendments that violate natural law. The attempt to defeat meritocratic aristocracy by the invention of a pseudoscientific religion by the cosmopolitan Jews: Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor, Mises, the Frankfurt School. The industrialization of deception under mass media, the alliance of finance, commerce, media, academy, and state, to exploit the middle and working classes to pay for the votes of the underclasses, the use of mass immigration of underclasses once their pseudoscientific, pseudorational, and pseudo-moral attempts at overthrow of the civlization had failed. And the intentional undermining of our constitution of natural law, our education systems, our history and our culture, our civic society, our family as the central object of policy, and our ancient aesthetics, and even our most sacred universal requirement for truthful speech regardless of the consequences. And the extraction of wealth from our people by the sale of shares in the economy at interest in order to generate consumption, rather than direct distribution of shares to individual citizens and forcing industry, finance, and state to compete for them – the virtual enslavement of our people. And lastly, the genocide that has been conducted against the white race in order to exterminate the aristocratic civilization by the middle eastern peoples despite having dragged humanity out of ignorance, superstition, hunger, disease, and poverty. All of this is possible by amending and thereby restoring this constitution, and restoring and preserving the ancient rights of anglo saxons and their ancestors: Sovereignty. The Cult of Non Submission. WE WERE FORGED BY TRUTH By the first principle of sovereignty, we were forced to discover and use deflationary truth in everything we have done for thousands of years. We can restore our people by the simple act of restoring truth, non-parasitism, and duty: every man a sheriff, and warrior. This is terribly easy to do. People do not have to believe a law that enforces reciprocity. They need only pursue their own interests and use that law to create reciprocity. And the central problem of our age is the destruction of our families by financial parasitism, international parasitism, and the industrialization of deceit. APOLOGIES I am sorry that this didn’t occur to me earlier. I didn’t realize how helpful it was to state what I considered to be obvious. If you write in the above grammar without the verb to be, you can construct most arguments. Curt Doolittle

  • Status of “The Book”: Natural Law

    ON THE ‘BOOK’ OR BOOKS OF NATURAL LAW (PROPERTARIANISM) Anne (All), You know, I can actually write a short book, “The Law of Nature”, with help from a few others in this group of ours. Although I still need a little help from the “Occultists” etc to color it a bit.

    Even a few months ago I thought I couldn’t do it yet. But I’ve realized over the past few weeks that I can. I can make a very short, very small book. In fact, I am getting close to thinking that I can write something as small as a pamphlet or paper. That’s the value of taking so long. I get better at ‘simplificating and adding brevity’. But you know, I’ve put more than a million dollars of my own money, and not insignificant amounts of my friends money, in to our product and I need to get it to commercial-quality done. That is my moral imperative. And honestly, evidence is that the longer I take, the more demand goes up, the better I get at saying it in fewer words. Our (my advisors and I) original plan still holds: 1 – put out enough of a skeleton on the web site that I can attract early adopters and good criticism from ‘near neighbors’ in the community. 2 – put out a booklet or pamphlet, or ‘paper’ that contains the full argument but without all the narrative and all the historical content and examples. 3 – put out ‘the bible of western civilization’ which will forever serve as the legal, moral, and religious basis of western peoples – and all peoples who wish to transcend. If it was easy someone else would have figured it out. But you know, christianity put an evil dent in our people. The defeat of roman civilization put an evil dent in our people. The muslim conquest put an evil dent in humanity. and unfortunately, and quite counter-intuitively, Mathematical reasoning put an evil dent in the greek philosophers. The basis of western civlization was always there: the cult of sovereignty: the initiatic brotherhood of warriors. “I shall speak the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth even if it brings me death. I will take nothing not paid for. And I will cause no other to bear cost by my words or deeds. And if I break this oath I ask you my brothers to kill me for it.” If you practice this oath of initiation on a civilizational scale (and regardless of gender), with near-kin, then you will get western civlization because one cannot both keep that oath and do anything other than construct western civlization: sovereignty, truth, and markets in everything. All I am doing is making even an argument against this oath prosecutable to the point of death. Curt Doolittle The Cult of Non Submission The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Natural Law of Sovereign Men The Propertarian Institute, Kiev, Ukraine

  • Status of “The Book”: Natural Law

    ON THE ‘BOOK’ OR BOOKS OF NATURAL LAW (PROPERTARIANISM) Anne (All), You know, I can actually write a short book, “The Law of Nature”, with help from a few others in this group of ours. Although I still need a little help from the “Occultists” etc to color it a bit.

    Even a few months ago I thought I couldn’t do it yet. But I’ve realized over the past few weeks that I can. I can make a very short, very small book. In fact, I am getting close to thinking that I can write something as small as a pamphlet or paper. That’s the value of taking so long. I get better at ‘simplificating and adding brevity’. But you know, I’ve put more than a million dollars of my own money, and not insignificant amounts of my friends money, in to our product and I need to get it to commercial-quality done. That is my moral imperative. And honestly, evidence is that the longer I take, the more demand goes up, the better I get at saying it in fewer words. Our (my advisors and I) original plan still holds: 1 – put out enough of a skeleton on the web site that I can attract early adopters and good criticism from ‘near neighbors’ in the community. 2 – put out a booklet or pamphlet, or ‘paper’ that contains the full argument but without all the narrative and all the historical content and examples. 3 – put out ‘the bible of western civilization’ which will forever serve as the legal, moral, and religious basis of western peoples – and all peoples who wish to transcend. If it was easy someone else would have figured it out. But you know, christianity put an evil dent in our people. The defeat of roman civilization put an evil dent in our people. The muslim conquest put an evil dent in humanity. and unfortunately, and quite counter-intuitively, Mathematical reasoning put an evil dent in the greek philosophers. The basis of western civlization was always there: the cult of sovereignty: the initiatic brotherhood of warriors. “I shall speak the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth even if it brings me death. I will take nothing not paid for. And I will cause no other to bear cost by my words or deeds. And if I break this oath I ask you my brothers to kill me for it.” If you practice this oath of initiation on a civilizational scale (and regardless of gender), with near-kin, then you will get western civlization because one cannot both keep that oath and do anything other than construct western civlization: sovereignty, truth, and markets in everything. All I am doing is making even an argument against this oath prosecutable to the point of death. Curt Doolittle The Cult of Non Submission The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Natural Law of Sovereign Men The Propertarian Institute, Kiev, Ukraine

  • ARISTOCRACY: THE INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION OF AGENCY Aristocracy: the production of

    ARISTOCRACY: THE INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION OF AGENCY

    Aristocracy: the production of Agency (peers) by the incremental suppression of parasitism, by the use of the common law, leaving no option for survival but market production: the civilization-wide industrialization of the domestication of the animal man, for fun and profit.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-20 18:46:00 UTC