(important) (core) (profound) (read more than once) Under Propertarianism’s Rule of Law by Natural Law, Soros could never have come into existence, could never attack western civilization; could never escape justice; and the takeover of the Universities in the 60’s impossible; the prosecution of communists in the 50’s successful; the and the import of the Frankfurt School impossible. Why? Truth, Reciprocity, Existential Possibility. Free markets are a lie. There exist no scale independent theories, and likewise, there exist no scale independent markets. They are another cosmopolitan invention. A moral pretense by which to engage in immoral actions. The requirement that we not impose costs by externality upon the investments of others causing the loss of capital in territorial, physical, institutional, cultural, normative, informational, familial, and genetic assets limits markets. Markets allow us to create opportunity through proximity, informational, informal and formal institutions, and physical infrastructure as a common good. Market opportunities are produced as a common good. We can then serve the common good by converting opportunity into exchanges, the performance of which, creates more than it consumes by the service of the coincidence of wants. We create opportunities for temporal compression through the division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor, and advocacy, and seize them through the identification of a coincidence of wants, thereby converting the potential for temporal compression into the existential compression of time. And it is through this temporal compression that we, collectively, in increasing scales, constantly reduce the cost of existence, and defeat the dark forces of time, ignorance, and scarcity. If you understand this you will understand all of human civilization, and the reason we have achieved what no other creatures have achieved. We must defeat the dark forces of time, ignorance, distance, and scarcity, and we do so through cooperation, and we cooperate through the incremental suppression of the imposition of costs on one another upon life, body, kin, possessions, and interests, in the form of violence, theft, fraud, falsehood, conspiracy, rents and free-riding. We accomplish this incremental suppression by the demand for a warranty of due diligence for our products(materials), services(actions), and information(speech) and the prosecution, restitution, punishment, ostracization, or execution, of those who circumvent that Warranty of Reciprocity by production, action, or speech. This leaves us with no option but to participate in voluntary markets under which we limit our productions, actions, and speech to that which consists of productive, fully informed (truthful), warrantied, voluntary transfer, free of imposition of cost upon the life, kin, possessions, and interests of others by externality. This explains the entirety of human existence. Curt Doolittle The Natural Law of Reciprocity The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Scripture of Nobility The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine
Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity
-
The Economics of Time and Morality
(important) (core) (profound) (read more than once) Under Propertarianism’s Rule of Law by Natural Law, Soros could never have come into existence, could never attack western civilization; could never escape justice; and the takeover of the Universities in the 60’s impossible; the prosecution of communists in the 50’s successful; the and the import of the Frankfurt School impossible. Why? Truth, Reciprocity, Existential Possibility. Free markets are a lie. There exist no scale independent theories, and likewise, there exist no scale independent markets. They are another cosmopolitan invention. A moral pretense by which to engage in immoral actions. The requirement that we not impose costs by externality upon the investments of others causing the loss of capital in territorial, physical, institutional, cultural, normative, informational, familial, and genetic assets limits markets. Markets allow us to create opportunity through proximity, informational, informal and formal institutions, and physical infrastructure as a common good. Market opportunities are produced as a common good. We can then serve the common good by converting opportunity into exchanges, the performance of which, creates more than it consumes by the service of the coincidence of wants. We create opportunities for temporal compression through the division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor, and advocacy, and seize them through the identification of a coincidence of wants, thereby converting the potential for temporal compression into the existential compression of time. And it is through this temporal compression that we, collectively, in increasing scales, constantly reduce the cost of existence, and defeat the dark forces of time, ignorance, and scarcity. If you understand this you will understand all of human civilization, and the reason we have achieved what no other creatures have achieved. We must defeat the dark forces of time, ignorance, distance, and scarcity, and we do so through cooperation, and we cooperate through the incremental suppression of the imposition of costs on one another upon life, body, kin, possessions, and interests, in the form of violence, theft, fraud, falsehood, conspiracy, rents and free-riding. We accomplish this incremental suppression by the demand for a warranty of due diligence for our products(materials), services(actions), and information(speech) and the prosecution, restitution, punishment, ostracization, or execution, of those who circumvent that Warranty of Reciprocity by production, action, or speech. This leaves us with no option but to participate in voluntary markets under which we limit our productions, actions, and speech to that which consists of productive, fully informed (truthful), warrantied, voluntary transfer, free of imposition of cost upon the life, kin, possessions, and interests of others by externality. This explains the entirety of human existence. Curt Doolittle The Natural Law of Reciprocity The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Scripture of Nobility The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine
-
Use the Argument to Reciprocity More Often.
USE THE ARGUMENT TO RECIPROCITY MORE? —“We (the real right) should use the word/concept of reciprocity a lot more in public discourse, because normies intuitively “get” the concept in its most basic form (not the full propertarian use, but the simple idea – e.g. the fact that it is one of Cialdini’s 6 laws of influence, people feel obligated to return good deeds & feel others have an obligation to return good deeds). It is a great way to diffuse the “we are obligated to hand over everything to the brown hordes” assertion. I like to say things like, “I care about 3rd-world immigrants and their children exactly as much as they care about me and my children: not at all.” Or “These people from very different cultures than Western Civ can come colonize our nations as soon as they agree to let us come do the same to their nations.”
This “bring up the reciprocity principle” exposes the hordes’ strategy for what it really is: nothing but a gimme-dat power-play. I know we’re done talking to the left. But tactics like these can demonstrate and reinforce our moral high ground to (not fully red-pilled) righties and normies.”— John Lille -
Use the Argument to Reciprocity More Often.
USE THE ARGUMENT TO RECIPROCITY MORE? —“We (the real right) should use the word/concept of reciprocity a lot more in public discourse, because normies intuitively “get” the concept in its most basic form (not the full propertarian use, but the simple idea – e.g. the fact that it is one of Cialdini’s 6 laws of influence, people feel obligated to return good deeds & feel others have an obligation to return good deeds). It is a great way to diffuse the “we are obligated to hand over everything to the brown hordes” assertion. I like to say things like, “I care about 3rd-world immigrants and their children exactly as much as they care about me and my children: not at all.” Or “These people from very different cultures than Western Civ can come colonize our nations as soon as they agree to let us come do the same to their nations.”
This “bring up the reciprocity principle” exposes the hordes’ strategy for what it really is: nothing but a gimme-dat power-play. I know we’re done talking to the left. But tactics like these can demonstrate and reinforce our moral high ground to (not fully red-pilled) righties and normies.”— John Lille -
Distributed Production >Militia >Sovereignty(Intolerance)> Natural Law (Reciproc
Distributed Production >Militia >Sovereignty(Intolerance)> Natural Law (Reciprocity)> Markets in Everything> Climbing Hierarchy> Innovation.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-02 15:15:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/859426154188595200
-
Pursuit of Prosperity vs Natural Law Results in Neither.
WORSHIP OF THE LAW VERSUS THE COMMERCIAL; FULL ACCOUNTING VIA POSITIVA, VIA NEGATIVA. Let me help you: by worship of the commercial we violate natural law and consume our previously accumulated capital. By the worship of natural law we cannot exist by other than the commercial but we are limited in that we cannot consume our previously accumulated capital. Worshipping the commercial is to love the consequence that kills you, rather than the cause that transcends you. Natural Law of Reciprocity creates wealth. It’s the property that results from reciprocity that causes the common law of torts.
The grammar of experiences, the grammar of intentions, the grammar of goods, and the grammar of morality, are all via positiva. The grammar of causality requires the grammar of operations. The adage that property is the result of the law of torts is only a half truth. Property results from reciprocity, results from the preservation of the incentive to cooperate, which results from the suppression of parasitism that violates cooperation – in all its forms. Half truths are deadly. If you cannot describe via negativa as well as via positiva you are failing to construct a full accounting and creating a moral hazard, and as such you are a danger to us all. -
Pursuit of Prosperity vs Natural Law Results in Neither.
WORSHIP OF THE LAW VERSUS THE COMMERCIAL; FULL ACCOUNTING VIA POSITIVA, VIA NEGATIVA. Let me help you: by worship of the commercial we violate natural law and consume our previously accumulated capital. By the worship of natural law we cannot exist by other than the commercial but we are limited in that we cannot consume our previously accumulated capital. Worshipping the commercial is to love the consequence that kills you, rather than the cause that transcends you. Natural Law of Reciprocity creates wealth. It’s the property that results from reciprocity that causes the common law of torts.
The grammar of experiences, the grammar of intentions, the grammar of goods, and the grammar of morality, are all via positiva. The grammar of causality requires the grammar of operations. The adage that property is the result of the law of torts is only a half truth. Property results from reciprocity, results from the preservation of the incentive to cooperate, which results from the suppression of parasitism that violates cooperation – in all its forms. Half truths are deadly. If you cannot describe via negativa as well as via positiva you are failing to construct a full accounting and creating a moral hazard, and as such you are a danger to us all. -
It Makes Sense
—Those who function by gossip and rallying will of course suppress all language that violates gossip, the same way that those of us who function by property and responsibility will of course suppress all action that violates property.— Curt Doolittle
-
It Makes Sense
—Those who function by gossip and rallying will of course suppress all language that violates gossip, the same way that those of us who function by property and responsibility will of course suppress all action that violates property.— Curt Doolittle
-
I can teach you the natural law. This is a technical category of knowledge. Accu
I can teach you the natural law. This is a technical category of knowledge. Accumulating the wisdom to know why it is true will take quite a bit of reading.
Now, I would prefer, that you did not take natural law on faith, explanatory power, argumentative power, discovery, and decidability power, but understood, because of your wisdom, why the alternative propositions have all failed.
But that said, if you take it purely on the evidence of the explanatory, argumentative, discovery, and decidability power it provides you then you will compete more successfully in life, and contribute to the restoration of your people.
If you take it on faith, I suppose that is good for you and good for us. But then this defeats the purpose of natural law. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-01 09:49:00 UTC