WOOD CHIPPER POLITICAL PARTY? ( lol 😉 )
by Eric Burkett
Here is how property really works:
…. If you won’t fight for it you then don’t own shit.
….. We tried principles.
….. We got open border child stripper communism.
Wood chippers now.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-16 18:04:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096832686818091008
IT STARTS WITH EVERY MAN CAPABLE OF BEARING ARMS
It all starts with the militia of sovereign men, pooling their resources to deny any and all any means of depriving them of sovereignty.
.—The distributed dictatorship of sovereign men— Eli Harman
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-16 13:02:00 UTC
WOW.
—“I know that you love your people. What Doolittle has done is write down The White Law. His accomplishment is one of the greatest achievements in the history of humanity. It is the only life line we whites have to save ourselves. So have a little humility and a little gratitude, and pay your debt to your ancestors. Do the work. Join us. We all must do the work.”—Eric Grose
…
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-16 07:37:00 UTC
yes but how do you establish duty in the first place?
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-15 15:45:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096435258373955585
Reply addressees: @xmjEE
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096405129039962113
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096405129039962113
WHAT ARE THE LEGIT CRITS OF PROP? (One More Time!!!) 2019-02-14
—“Curt: honest question: What are the faults/weaknesses to propertarianism? I am a supporter but no human system is perfect and would like to know that you have thought out how to beat your own plan and what are the counters to slow or stop those from happening. Keep up the good work. Thanks if you respond.”—
Um. I publish legit criticisms all the time. There are a few. They are all reducible to:
People want a political ideology, religion, or secular religion (philosophy) and prop is simply science and law, with ADVICE on religion and secular religion.
Jewish, christian, islamic religion do not come off very well, and I have not found a way to accommodate christian mysticism.
Everyone wants a monopoly (religion, authoritarianism, fascism, anarchism) when we must use each of these components in every society – we cannot have a monopoly on any of them. People want me to take a stand on THEIR preferred way of organizing society – i use all of them.
I suggest a few methods of governing across various peoples and various conditions with the law being the only constant. People want me to take a stand on THEIR preferred order. I use what is required.
I am an unabashed elitist working in favor of my people, but other than knowing what is good for my people, I do not consider their understanding of the world very valuable. Only the set of demands they have, not their way of satisfying them. ( I do not claim to be a good, a moral, or decent person or anything of the sort, I only claim I am correct. God knows I’ve made the same mistakes everyone else has. )
As far as I know there are no extant criticisms of the work itself and it will be extremely unlikely such things will arise other than in nuances. This is revolutionary and once you understand it your life will be changed forever. THE COMMON LEGIT CRITS … are listed in Section 3 Here: https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156982914672264
WHAT ARE THE LEGIT CRITS OF PROP? (One More Time!!!)
—“Curt: honest question: What are the faults/weaknesses to propertarianism? I am a supporter but no human system is perfect and would like to know that you have thought out how to beat your own plan and what are the counters to slow or stop those from happening. Keep up the good work. Thanks if you respond.”—
Um. I publish legit criticisms all the time. There are a few.
They are all reducible to:
1. Its big, complex, deep, and hard to learn. It is. The more I undrestand it myself, the more I understand that this scale of thing has only happened three other times in history. But people want something simple-stupid like libertarianism or progressivism. It’s not an ideology. it’s the completion of the scientific method, it’s application to all human thought, embodiment in the law, and means of restoring our civilization.
2. People want a political ideology, religion, or secular religion (philosophy) and prop is simply science and law, with ADVICE on religion and secular religion.
3. Jewish, christian, islamic religion do not come off very well, and I have not found a way to accommodate christian mysticism.
4. Everyone wants a monopoly (religion, authoritarianism, fascism, anarchism) when we must use each of these components in every society – we cannot have a monopoly on any of them. People want me to take a stand on THEIR preferred way of organizing society – i use all of them.
5. I suggest a few methods of governing across various peoples and various conditions with the law being the only constant. People want me to take a stand on THEIR preferred order. I use what is required.
6. I am an unabashed elitist working in favor of my people, but other than knowing what is good for my people, I do not consider their understanding of the world very valuable. Only the set of demands they have, not their way of satisfying them. ( I do not claim to be a good, a moral, or decent person or anything of the sort, I only claim I am correct. God knows I’ve made the same mistakes everyone else has. )
As far as I know there are no extant criticisms of the work itself and it will be extremely unlikely such things will arise other than in nuances. This is revolutionary and once you understand it your life will be changed forever.
THE COMMON LEGIT CRITS
… are listed in Section 3 Here:
https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156982914672264
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-14 09:54:00 UTC
—“One time I asked Curt Doolittle “What is stopping me from killing you, taking your things, and r*p*ing your women?”. He told me that if I wanted to do those things than he would join me and recruit more men to help and so on.”—- Lance Starin
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 20:52:00 UTC
—-“One does not become a Propertarian. One only discovers, sooner or later, that one has always been one — that, by nature, one could not possibly be anything else.” —Savitri Devi (edited posthumously by Matt Lawlor)
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 16:55:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1095728165761286144
—-“One does not become a Propertarian. One only discovers, sooner or later, that one has always been one — that, by nature, one could not possibly be anything else.” —Savitri Devi (edited posthumously by Matt Lawlor)
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 11:55:00 UTC
TERMINAL MORONITUDE
—“FWIW: “There is no ‘wrong’. There is only what people will retaliate against you for doing.” They retaliate against you for some reason. That reason is the imposition of costs upon that which they have born costs to obtain an interest. it’s that simple. Propertarianism isn’t excuses making for priors. It’s just empirical evidence of the accumulated history of mankind across all civilizations.”— CURTD
—“Moral relativism is always a red flag.”—Moron
Um, it’s MORAL ABSOLUTISM. You silly git. it’s EMPIRICAL moral absolutism.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-12 19:51:00 UTC