Curt Doolittle

Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity

  • “PROPERTARIANISM ISN’T AN IDEOLOGY. IT’S THE LOGIC OF RECIPROCITY (Propertariani

    “PROPERTARIANISM ISN’T AN IDEOLOGY. IT’S THE LOGIC OF RECIPROCITY (Propertarianism) AND THE SCIENCE OF TESTIMONY, COMBINED INTO A FORMAL RATIO-EMPIRICAL SYSTEM OF LAW (Decidability) FOR ETHICS, AND POLITICS.

    (repost)

    In other words, it’s the solution to social science.

    —“This is crucial for people that want to claim they don’t adhere to the “propertarian ideology”. It is not an ideology. It is a methodology and much like science it focuses on empirical evidence and the falsification of proposed truth claims. Most people that say they don’t agree with “propertarian ideology” have an ideology of their own that has been found to be based on lies via propertarian methods and that’s the real objection.”– Curtus Maximus

    You cannot defeat it. Sorry. You can however, state that despite your ideology being parasitic, predatory(immoral) and dishonest (fraudulent) that you cannot compete by meritocratic (market, evolutionary, eugenic) means, (meaning you’re inferior) and therefore must resort to parasitism, predation, and deceit (fraud), to survive by parasitism, predation, and fraud.

    It’s ok to do that. It’s just the truth. But you can’t make any kind of moral argument to support it.” – Curt Doolittle

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-10 13:11:00 UTC

  • MORALITY AMORALITY CONFLICT DESPOTISM AND THE SOCIOPATHIC MIND. MORALITY Some ba

    MORALITY AMORALITY CONFLICT DESPOTISM AND THE SOCIOPATHIC MIND.

    MORALITY

    Some basis of morality either exists or it does not. The science, law, and logic say that such a thing is called reciprocity, and reciprocity within the bounds of proportionality, and outside of the bounds of proportionality exit is necessary for any disadvantaged party. And that prohibition on or unbearable cost of exit is the origin of conflict, fighting, and war.

    AMORALITY

    If no basis for morality exists, then all that is required is power to force whatever order upon people that is useful. This is a license for any and all for corruption at every level. In other worse, one has rule of law and decidability, or one has rule by man and authority.

    CONFLICT

    The evolution of the law has been a battle between corruption (rule by man) and morality (rule of law). Even socialism (rule by man) and capitalism (rule of law), and globalism (rule by men) and nationalism (rule of law), and representative democracy (rule by men), and direct democracy (rule of law) are simply various examples of a long standing battle between the moral men who produce and the immoral men to live by parasitism.

    DESPOTISM

    The despot’s argument: empower elites further in order to garner favor (suck up to more successful people). Seize power and opportunity at every opportunity. Incrementally exercise pent up envy, anger, hatred, in order to gain pleasure and relief.

    SOCIOPATHY

    Sociopaths use a well documented set of tactics. They are natural liars. They will choose to lie even if the truth is just as advantageous. And once you know how lies are constructed, by using suggestion to force appeal to intuition, then you are no longer vulnerable to liars.

    The Sociopath’s Mind:

    “I must dominate, rule, punish, harm”

    “I have had no achievements”

    “I have no resources”

    “I am not likable or desirable”

    “I cannot build a following nor participate in one”

    “I cannot build an organization nor participate in one”

    “I can only use deceit and cunning because of this”

    “I will use deceit and cunning to self promote at all times”

    “I will shift locations, alliances, positions, tactics, claims, anything, and deny anything else, in order to exercise my sociopathy and related rewards”

    This person will always favor despotism because it is in his interests. Because there is no other means by which those without merit can exercise any agency over those others they envy, despise, and hate.

    THAT IS A CHAIN OF REASONING.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-10 12:44:00 UTC

  • And I answered questions according to that law. Not according to whether it’s no

    … And I answered questions according to that law. Not according to whether it’s normative, pleasant, or acceptable. Just whether decidable (true). The law does not appeal for your permission. It just is the law whether you like it or not. And my work on law suppresses untruth.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-10 03:23:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1094436623637458945

    Reply addressees: @PoisonAero @frattinicaue @JFGariepy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1094435122584215552

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @PoisonAero @frattinicaue @JFGariepy I don’t do ideology. I do law. What you folks do with law is up to you. but ask me to decide a question, I can do so using the law. It’s just that some of those decisions are unpleasant. …

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1094435122584215552

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @PoisonAero @frattinicaue @JFGariepy I don’t do ideology. I do law. What you folks do with law is up to you. but ask me to decide a question, I can do so using the law. It’s just that some of those decisions are unpleasant. …

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1094435122584215552

  • I don’t do ideology. I do law. What you folks do with law is up to you. but ask

    I don’t do ideology. I do law. What you folks do with law is up to you. but ask me to decide a question, I can do so using the law. It’s just that some of those decisions are unpleasant. …

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-10 03:17:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1094435122584215552

    Reply addressees: @PoisonAero @frattinicaue @JFGariepy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1094430615837933568

    IN REPLY TO:

    @PoisonAero

    @curtdoolittle @frattinicaue @JFGariepy Is that an appeal to popularity? It doesn’t make much sense coming from a fringe ideology.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1094430615837933568

  • Will you use god in an argument to try to undermine the natural law? If not. The

    Will you use god in an argument to try to undermine the natural law? If not. Then fine. This is about political speech. To end lying to our people.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-09 23:52:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1094383539330666496

    Reply addressees: @MusaVaino @JFGariepy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1094370511331692544

    IN REPLY TO:

    @MusaVaino

    @JFGariepy @curtdoolittle Go deep into testimonials! Is it okey to say I believe in God or I love my God if you have propertarian nation?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1094370511331692544

  • I mean, if you are a child, a pet, or a domesticated animal, unable to carry the

    I mean, if you are a child, a pet, or a domesticated animal, unable to carry the peerage of sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and duty, law and markets, and as such must escape a reality for which you are unfit, then I am sure that your betters will provide it for you.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-09 21:23:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1094346091380817920

    Reply addressees: @PaddockSperg

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1094341468825812993

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1094341468825812993

  • “How to help your normie friends get the concept of propertarianism: “Imagine li

    —“How to help your normie friends get the concept of propertarianism: “Imagine libertarians. Now strip away all the lies. Then imagine they were men. Now you have Propertarianism.”—- Noah J Revoy

    Ouch!

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-07 21:33:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1093623806630027266

  • “How to help your normie friends get the concept of propertarianism: “Imagine li

    —“How to help your normie friends get the concept of propertarianism: “Imagine libertarians. Now strip away all the lies. Then imagine they were men. Now you have Propertarianism.”—- Noah J Revoy

    Ouch!

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-07 16:33:00 UTC

  • “Well it is libertarianism 2.0, with a clear definition of property, a ban on pa

    —“Well it is libertarianism 2.0, with a clear definition of property, a ban on parasitism, and severe legal repercussions for lying in media, journalism and government. Why do you ask?”— James Knowles

    (…priceless….)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-06 01:42:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1092961594491822082

  • “Well it is libertarianism 2.0, with a clear definition of property, a ban on pa

    —“Well it is libertarianism 2.0, with a clear definition of property, a ban on parasitism, and severe legal repercussions for lying in media, journalism and government. Why do you ask?”— James Knowles

    (…priceless….)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-05 20:41:00 UTC