Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence

BECAUSE MARRIAGE IS A DEAD INSTITUTION
–“So, what you are saying is men who don’t want to lose their income to alimony and child support”–
No. I’m saying the evidentiary truth: That (a) there is no disparity in earnings between men and women other than that men prefer to work more hours with greater loyalty to the organization, and especially when under 35, women are out-earning men; in fact, women are demonstrating a preference for hyperconsumption and NOT marrying, and for NOT having children – and doing so in vast numbers: about half. (b) single households for men and women mean more expensive households for each, especially when women accumulate most debt (c) women have adopted the male behavior of sex for enjoyment not bonding for reciprocal care, so there is no sexual incentive for marriage and a vast disincentive for men (d) women determine whether a child is born or not (e) women initiate 80% of divorces and 90% when educated (f) Marriage with common property, alimony, and child support are no longer institutions of reciprocity (“fair” or “rational”). So marriage is a dead institution (g) that whoever wants the children must pay for them. (h) despite that mothers are detrimental parents after the age of eight, and fathers are superior parents after the age of eight. (i) but that mothers undermine fathers so that they cannot practically parent after eight.

Feminist actively sought to destroy all male support organizations of every kind from educational to social to religious to military – and through activist legislation destroyed them. At the same time feminists destroyed the institution of marriage. At the same time the state moved most physical labor work offshore reducing male income potential, while women occupied the ‘easy’ clerical jobs, driving men into higher risk occupations with greater accumulated cellular damage.

I’m pretty confident we will continue reversals of activist (positive) law that violated constitutional and natural rights will occur within the next decade: (a) restoring liability for interference in marriage, interference in occupation, and interference in business, (b) restoring fault and liability in divorce (c) specifically defining marriage as the public insurance of non-interference in the marriage; that marriage is a contract, including an exchange of limited powers of attorney, for reciprocal care, and the production of offspring into citizens capable of self-sufficiency; (d) ending common property, alimony, child support, and (e) and granting parental rights to the party that pays; with each parent paying for what they choose to. (f) and restoring parental liability for the behavior of their children.

As a result, I expect the restoration of reciprocity in relationships and the restoration of the durability of marriage, and the rapid reduction of arbitrary, predatory, and parasitic divorce, and the negative consequences for our society.

Every single positive-law test we have run has been a failure.

The court has just begun with abortion and 2nd amendment. The rest must and will follow. Because we’re going to run out of people, especially people with the intellectual capacity to run an advanced technological society within another generation if this continues.

Reply addressees: @Shaman_Ka @asphodelmoon