Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence

  • You mean duplicating the actions of the founders in their common law suit agains

    You mean duplicating the actions of the founders in their common law suit against the state for the redress of grievances by their Petition To The King? ;). The method that is expressly permitted in and justified under the common law and exemplified in the Declaration of Independence? ;). And that we recommend returning cultural independence to the states and restoring the federal government to its original role in defense, trade, and the resolution of differences, thereby allowing us to create of establish different cultures as we see fit, as was the tradition of the european people throughout our history?
    Yes I would suggest our people understand the european group evolutionary strategy, its embodiment in the traditional then common then concurrent law, as discovered by the long history of the natural law research program, with the British invention of modernity and the modern state, and the codification of it all in Blackstone, and the american federalist papers, the declaration, the constitution, the bill of rights, and (less accurately to satisfy the communists in items ?24+) in the declaration of human rights?
    Yes I would like our people to understand the concept of natural law (the science of cooperation) natural rights (the science of minimum necessary rights and obligations to bring about natural law), the meaning of text as a weight and measure at the time of recording, the transactional process of law that like monetary accounting forces full accounting and due process, the reason for the independence of the judiciary and the legislature, and the meaning of commonality in law, and concurrency in voting and legislation, all of which are specifically designed to prevent tyranny of authority and tyranny of majority, requiring concurrency of consent of the citizens for any and all legislation passed.
    Now I’ll venture you don’t know this or why it’s so, and why you’re probably in no position to opine on our system of law and government, and because of it why our education is destroying the civilization from within just as the ‘intentional march thru the institutions of cultural production’ stated they would do, by taking advantage of the fact that educators are from the bottoms of their graduating classes, and largely women, and as such are vulnerable to suggestion and groupthink.

    Reply addressees: @hockeygirl_CA @Angelia_143 @terrilbruce @GregAbbott_TX


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-16 15:58:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647630631495507972

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647624722639917057

  • You mean duplicating the actions of the founders in their common law suit agains

    You mean duplicating the actions of the founders in their common law suit against the state for the redress of grievances by their Petition To The King? ;). The method that is expressly permitted in and justified under the common law and exemplified in the Declaration of Independence? ;). And that we recommend returning cultural independence to the states and restoring the federal government to its original role in defense, trade, and the resolution of differences, thereby allowing us to create of establish different cultures as we see fit, as was the tradition of the european people throughout our history?
    Yes I would suggest our people understand the european group evolutionary strategy, its embodiment in the traditional then common then concurrent law, as discovered by the long history of the natural law research program, with the British invention of modernity and the modern state, and the codification of it all in Blackstone, and the american federalist papers, the declaration, the constitution, the bill of rights, and (less accurately to satisfy the communists in items ?24+) in the declaration of human rights?
    Yes I would like our people to understand the concept of natural law (the science of cooperation) natural rights (the science of minimum necessary rights and obligations to bring about natural law), the meaning of text as a weight and measure at the time of recording, the transactional process of law that like monetary accounting forces full accounting and due process, the reason for the independence of the judiciary and the legislature, and the meaning of commonality in law, and concurrency in voting and legislation, all of which are specifically designed to prevent tyranny of authority and tyranny of majority, requiring concurrency of consent of the citizens for any and all legislation passed.
    Now I’ll venture you don’t know this or why it’s so, and why you’re probably in no position to opine on our system of law and government, and because of it why our education is destroying the civilization from within just as the ‘intentional march thru the institutions of cultural production’ stated they would do, by taking advantage of the fact that educators are from the bottoms of their graduating classes, and largely women, and as such are vulnerable to suggestion and groupthink.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-16 15:58:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647630631696842754

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647624722639917057

  • RT @RichardHanania: Florida considering death penalty for rape under 12 years ol

    RT @RichardHanania: Florida considering death penalty for rape under 12 years old.

    Supreme Court said this was unconstitutional in 2008,…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-16 13:23:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647591488216334337

  • FUnny you should assume such a thing. We graduallly teach reading, writing, math

    FUnny you should assume such a thing. We graduallly teach reading, writing, mathematics and history, and we can equally teach ethics, the basics of contract law as ethics, the basics of economics as the result of ethics. etc.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-16 13:19:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647590509353877504

    Reply addressees: @DiceCookPlate @terrilbruce @GregAbbott_TX

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647589522388000769

  • You can’t have a right to ignore commands, aggress against, violate the space of

    You can’t have a right to ignore commands, aggress against, violate the space of, taunt, even address police. And you certainly can’t have the right to riot.
    Worse, you don’t pay into the retirement system, you pay for those who are older, and those who are younger may pay you. BUT if you don’t produce enough children (you don’t), and if you depend on immigrants who are dependent rather that productive (you did), then there is no one to pay for you. So the person in the french mirror is the person to blame.

    Reply addressees: @real1maria


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-16 12:57:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647585013205020674

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647313678281080832

  • You can’t have a right to ignore commands, aggress against, violate the space of

    You can’t have a right to ignore commands, aggress against, violate the space of, taunt, even address police. And you certainly can’t have the right to riot.
    Worse, you don’t pay into the retirement system, you pay for those who are older, and those who are younger may pay you. BUT if you don’t produce enough children (you don’t), and if you depend on immigrants who are dependent rather that productive (you did), then there is no one to pay for you. So the person in the french mirror is the person to blame.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-16 12:57:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647585013293096963

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647313678281080832

  • President monarchy (state), senate nobility (region), house (property(business))

    President monarchy (state), senate nobility (region), house (property(business)) owners and producers, lower house (families and labor – replacing the church’s vote), and possibly a separate house for women with three or more children.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-15 17:47:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647295473126977536

    Reply addressees: @FlashGorgone

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647267032566472705

  • Not sure which argument you’re making. But for a prosecutor who lets felons go o

    Not sure which argument you’re making. But for a prosecutor who lets felons go on a daily basis, to prosecute trump for a procedural violation where there is no victim, and the maximum historical fee of which has been $500, is kind of ridiculous, because it’s obviously a political prosecution. Same thing for prosecuting Clinton for BJs from an intern. This is political nonsense. I’d be happy to argue the case on behalf of trump because it’s a no-lose proposition for him politically.

    Reply addressees: @jimdorf @AttyTMD @lawofruby


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-15 17:45:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647294988537982983

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647276482648236032

  • Not sure which argument you’re making. But for a prosecutor who lets felons go o

    Not sure which argument you’re making. But for a prosecutor who lets felons go on a daily basis, to prosecute trump for a procedural violation where there is no victim, and the maximum historical fee of which has been $500, is kind of ridiculous, because it’s obviously a political prosecution. Same thing for prosecuting Clinton for BJs from an intern. This is political nonsense. I’d be happy to argue the case on behalf of trump because it’s a no-lose proposition for him politically.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-15 17:45:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647294988638642178

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647276482648236032

  • You do realize that simple people have emotions, and spophisticted people have f

    You do realize that simple people have emotions, and spophisticted people have frustrations?
    So, in this case he doesn’t like the fact that the defense created an explicit record of denial, that the denial is discretionary, and that does not directly address the reason for the denial.
    This is how you document judicial ‘discretions’ that may bias the case.
    That’s whats going on.
    If the judge is ‘miffed’ it’s becaues he’s being called out, and his actions documented.

    Reply addressees: @mmethe411 @lawofruby


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-15 14:50:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647250998602113024

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647248016573714436