Curt Doolittle

Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence

  • If you run into the ‘hard questions’ please ask. I work on the law itself ‘as co

    If you run into the ‘hard questions’ please ask.
    I work on the law itself ‘as code’. (Which was far harder than any of us assumed and I was one of the first people to do it in the 80s’). Diver’s book is more interested in crypto adhering to rules as we do in law. I assume you’re more concerned about the conflict between crypto and law.
    Anyway, happy to chat if it’d help you.
    We need more publications in this context.

    Reply addressees: @functi0nZer0

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-02 00:21:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653193035021262849

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653147261570801668

  • If you run into the ‘hard questions’ please ask. I work on the law itself ‘as co

    If you run into the ‘hard questions’ please ask.
    I work on the law itself ‘as code’. (Which was far harder than any of us assumed and I was one of the first people to do it in the 80s’). Diver’s book is more interested in crypto adhering to rules as we do in law. I assume you’re more concerned about the conflict between crypto and law.
    Anyway, happy to chat if it’d help you.
    We need more publications in this context.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-02 00:21:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653193035117633536

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653147261570801668

  • Yes of course I have, and in particular I spent most of my time on Mendelsohn vs

    Yes of course I have, and in particular I spent most of my time on Mendelsohn vs Blackstone. And I’m more gentlemanly than you presume or I would ask you to explain the asymmetirc ethics, the hatred of europeans and persians (the indo europeans), the ethics of the industries jews have specialzed in (and continue to), and the reason that the rabbinical movement tried to integrate the legitimacy of greek reason in to jewish law, just as unfortunately, augustine attempted to ingegrate semitic superstition into greek reason. Thankfully Aquinas understood the error granting science primacy as needed. Thankfully Smith, Hume, Blackstone, and finally Darwin finished that project of divorcing european empirical reason from semitic superstition despite the lingering attraction and the conversion of judaism and the ethics of the diaspora in to marxism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, feminism, pc-woke, and the intention undermining of western civilization by sedition by marching through the institutions of cultural produciong taking largely advantage of the suggestibility and magical thinking of women to finance the means of doing so.

    Reply addressees: @AmKsheOref @Hamishtadel1 @Vessel_of_Glass

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-02 00:05:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653188839249264642

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653182749694480388

  • Yes of course I have, and in particular I spent most of my time on Mendelsohn vs

    Yes of course I have, and in particular I spent most of my time on Mendelsohn vs Blackstone. And I’m more gentlemanly than you presume or I would ask you to explain the asymmetirc ethics, the hatred of europeans and persians (the indo europeans), the ethics of the industries jews have specialzed in (and continue to), and the reason that the rabbinical movement tried to integrate the legitimacy of greek reason in to jewish law, just as unfortunately, augustine attempted to ingegrate semitic superstition into greek reason. Thankfully Aquinas understood the error granting science primacy as needed. Thankfully Smith, Hume, Blackstone, and finally Darwin finished that project of divorcing european empirical reason from semitic superstition despite the lingering attraction and the conversion of judaism and the ethics of the diaspora in to marxism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, feminism, pc-woke, and the intention undermining of western civilization by sedition by marching through the institutions of cultural produciong taking largely advantage of the suggestibility and magical thinking of women to finance the means of doing so.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-02 00:05:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653188839366590465

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653182749694480388

  • The only interesting problem is why did the anglos alone survive the centuries o

    The only interesting problem is why did the anglos alone survive the centuries of warfare against the natural common concurrent law of prohibition on authority, requiring responsibility, resulting in individual sovereignty as the reward for the responsibility for the defense of the private and common.

    Betham tried it.
    The French (Catholics) succeeded.
    The jews have always practiced it and they are the only other people of law in the sense we mean it – even if it is not natural, moral, or ethical law. But it is this obsession with law that makes the jews and the west the primary producers of ideas.

    Reply addressees: @Lunca92

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-01 17:25:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653088151013933075

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653086711100981254

  • The only interesting problem is why did the anglos alone survive the centuries o

    The only interesting problem is why did the anglos alone survive the centuries of warfare against the natural common concurrent law of prohibition on authority, requiring responsibility, resulting in individual sovereignty as the reward for the responsibility for the defense of the private and common.

    Betham tried it.
    The French (Catholics) succeeded.
    The jews have always practiced it and they are the only other people of law in the sense we mean it – even if it is not natural, moral, or ethical law. But it is this obsession with law that makes the jews and the west the primary producers of ideas.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-01 17:25:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653088151139696641

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653086711100981254

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @William68332190 @briangeraghty2 @pearlythingz Aside from the

    RT @curtdoolittle: @William68332190 @briangeraghty2 @pearlythingz Aside from the fact that the 14th amendment is unconstitutional, but inst…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-01 17:11:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653084800842866689

  • Aside from the fact that the 14th amendment is unconstitutional, but instead a l

    Aside from the fact that the 14th amendment is unconstitutional, but instead a legislative device for the conduct of the (unjust) civil war and reparations and reconstruction thereafter, and as such should be repealed (we do so in our reforms) – as usual, the text without the context is easily interpreted as other than it means. “All words are measurements recorded as measurements at the time of their writing.” We don’t get to put our fingers on the ‘legal activism scale’.

    –“The primary purpose of this provision was to ensure the federal government’s commitment to repaying the debts incurred during the Civil War while simultaneously preventing the payment of any debts or claims associated with the Confederacy or slaveholders. By doing so, it helped to protect the financial stability of the United States and prevent any political or legal attempts to undermine the Union’s efforts during the Civil War.
    In summary, Section 4 of the 14th Amendment aimed to reaffirm the legitimacy of the public debt incurred by the United States during the Civil War, deny any financial claims from the Confederacy or slaveholders, and strengthen the financial foundation of the country during the Reconstruction Era.”–

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-01 17:11:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653084777686220821

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653036193347502080

  • Aside from the fact that the 14th amendment is unconstitutional, but instead a l

    Aside from the fact that the 14th amendment is unconstitutional, but instead a legislative device for the conduct of the (unjust) civil war and reparations and reconstruction thereafter, and as such should be repealed (we do so in our reforms) – as usual, the text without the context is easily interpreted as other than it means. “All words are measurements recorded as measurements at the time of their writing.” We don’t get to put our fingers on the ‘legal activism scale’.

    –“The primary purpose of this provision was to ensure the federal government’s commitment to repaying the debts incurred during the Civil War while simultaneously preventing the payment of any debts or claims associated with the Confederacy or slaveholders. By doing so, it helped to protect the financial stability of the United States and prevent any political or legal attempts to undermine the Union’s efforts during the Civil War.
    In summary, Section 4 of the 14th Amendment aimed to reaffirm the legitimacy of the public debt incurred by the United States during the Civil War, deny any financial claims from the Confederacy or slaveholders, and strengthen the financial foundation of the country during the Reconstruction Era.”–

    Reply addressees: @William68332190 @briangeraghty2 @pearlythingz

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-01 17:11:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653084777560391707

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653036193347502080

  • More later (meeting time), but quickly, the three jewish legal scholars (like Be

    More later (meeting time), but quickly, the three jewish legal scholars (like Bentham and Rawls) are working to justify authoritarian (positive) law as used in the Jewish system, and adopted by the French as continental law.

    The ‘evil’ of this model isn’t apparent until you understand our traditional (Natural) law, as the very opposite in origin.

    I’ll address it later. ‘Cause it’s fun. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-01 14:28:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653043666628345858

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653039717443678209