Curt Doolittle

Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence

  • NATURAL RIGHTS Technically speaking, market demand for the production of a commo

    NATURAL RIGHTS

    Technically speaking, market demand for the production of a commons(institution) that creates natural rights of appeal for defense before an insurer of some sort (court), demonstrably exist. The market demand exists. Sure. Like any commons, markets succeed or fail at producing them.

    As far as I know, the only natural right that is possible is reciprocal insurance of sovereignty against trespass(imposition of costs upon our demonstrated interests), in life(mind, body, family), liberty (privacy, movement, action, word, display, association, cooperation, production), estate (demonstrated interest, several property, share property, common property, capital), and defense (security, of life, liberty, estate).

    So Natural Rights: “Reciprocity in Sovereignty, Life, Liberty, Property, and Defense” created by “An insurer to whom one can appeal for restitution, prevention, punishment of offenders.”

    Lock didn’t get it right unfortunately.

    We can further enumerate each of these rights in order to prevent others from attempts to usurp them through sophistry and deceit.

    The declaration of human rights contains a lot of nonsense like ‘dignity’, mostly duplication, and at the end, impossible aspirations that cannot be construed as rights,

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-18 20:30:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/85234800_210892573642237_56826014361

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/85234800_210892573642237_56826014361

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/85234800_210892573642237_5682601436119040000_o_210892566975571.jpg IN THE P-Constitution, LAW, RIGHTS, COURT PRECEDE STATE. THEY ARE NOT MUTABLE

    The propertarian constitution begins with European Natural Law of Sovereigns – a Law that is not mutable and cannot be violated. Then the constitution begins with definitions and declarations about mankind, then restates that law, then the rights that stem from it, then the court process. So, rights PRECEDE the constitution of the state and its policies. This is one of the mistakes the founders made that we are correcting.

    There is no method of altering the Natural Law, Definitions of Man, Statement of the Law, Rights, and Court. There is not really any way of modifying the organization of the state. The rest consists of policies.IN THE P-Constitution, LAW, RIGHTS, COURT PRECEDE STATE. THEY ARE NOT MUTABLE

    The propertarian constitution begins with European Natural Law of Sovereigns – a Law that is not mutable and cannot be violated. Then the constitution begins with definitions and declarations about mankind, then restates that law, then the rights that stem from it, then the court process. So, rights PRECEDE the constitution of the state and its policies. This is one of the mistakes the founders made that we are correcting.

    There is no method of altering the Natural Law, Definitions of Man, Statement of the Law, Rights, and Court. There is not really any way of modifying the organization of the state. The rest consists of policies.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-18 19:56:00 UTC

  • SECOND AMENDENT ENFORCEMENT By Jerry Odom. Any individual, governmental, private

    SECOND AMENDENT ENFORCEMENT

    By Jerry Odom.

    Any individual, governmental, private representative, or entity at any level of the government that introduces or votes to pass any new law, legislation, ordinance, or resolution on any aspects related to the bearing, holding, carrying, transportation, or storage of firearms, or, any aspect included within this amendment will be considered an act of treason.

    Their position will be automatically forfeited; they shall never be allowed to serve in any function of the government whether at the Local, State, or Federal levels for the remainder of their lifetime. Local law enforcement shall remove any individual who does not self-vacate.

    In the unlikely event that the local law enforcement fails to act on the same, they also will forfeit their positions immediately and can no longer serve in any capacity in the government for their lifetime as well.

    Should the above occur, then any local Constitutional Militia shall have the right and duty, along with full law enforcement authority, including the use of deadly force, to remove the guilty parties and restore order.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-18 09:25:00 UTC

  • Ugh. What’s P-Law on Taboo Subjects in Public Speech?

    Ugh. What’s P-Law on Taboo Subjects in Public Speech? https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/17/ugh-whats-p-law-on-taboo-subjects-in-public-speech/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-17 23:13:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229544501951246337

  • Ugh. What’s P-Law on Taboo Subjects in Public Speech?

    —“How would holocaust denial be dealt with under P-law?”– A Friend

    [H]ow would any public speech be dealt with under P-law? In public, to the public, in matters public, suppression of the truth, or attempts at discovering the truth are prohibited under P-law. Conversely, falsehood is prohibited under P. The difference is that under P-law, speech in public, to the public, in matters public, is involuntarily warrantied. Including the dishonest use of statements masquerading as questions. So, public trial by propaganda, sophistry, and falsehood is illegal and expensive for any party since the cost of correcting public speech is prohibitively expensive. As such one can investigate, and report findings, like we do in any science, but we cannot make claims or imply claims without liability for error, bias, and deceit. Personally I’m far less concerned about this subject than I am the destruction and death by marxism, bolshevism, Leninism, maoism; the current civilizational destruction under postmodernism and denialism; and the ancient world’s destruction by judaism, Christianity and especially the billion dead under islam. So, sure, I tend to think the holocaust industry has gotten out of hand but I don’t know truth from falsehood myself, and I think it would be useful to discover what’s true and what’s false in order to stop both sides from propagandizing. I hate this topic. I try to avoid it at all costs. But I do my job. My job is to answer the tough questions. That’s what y’all pay me for with those donations.

  • Ugh. What’s P-Law on Taboo Subjects in Public Speech?

    —“How would holocaust denial be dealt with under P-law?”– A Friend

    [H]ow would any public speech be dealt with under P-law? In public, to the public, in matters public, suppression of the truth, or attempts at discovering the truth are prohibited under P-law. Conversely, falsehood is prohibited under P. The difference is that under P-law, speech in public, to the public, in matters public, is involuntarily warrantied. Including the dishonest use of statements masquerading as questions. So, public trial by propaganda, sophistry, and falsehood is illegal and expensive for any party since the cost of correcting public speech is prohibitively expensive. As such one can investigate, and report findings, like we do in any science, but we cannot make claims or imply claims without liability for error, bias, and deceit. Personally I’m far less concerned about this subject than I am the destruction and death by marxism, bolshevism, Leninism, maoism; the current civilizational destruction under postmodernism and denialism; and the ancient world’s destruction by judaism, Christianity and especially the billion dead under islam. So, sure, I tend to think the holocaust industry has gotten out of hand but I don’t know truth from falsehood myself, and I think it would be useful to discover what’s true and what’s false in order to stop both sides from propagandizing. I hate this topic. I try to avoid it at all costs. But I do my job. My job is to answer the tough questions. That’s what y’all pay me for with those donations.

  • PART 5 – Findings of the Law

    THE GOOD

    PLEASURE

    CHOICE

    VALUE

    PREFERENCE

    GOOD

    VIOLENCE

    LOYALTY

    EMPATHY

    PANDERING

    TOLERANCE —“Once you see that extending tolerance to immoral political behavior is ITSELF immoral, you can’t un-see it.”—Michael Churchill

    TOLERATING A KNOWN THEFT

    CHARITY

    FAIRNESS

    EQUALITY

    FEMINISM

    FEMININITY

    MASCULINITY

    IDENTITY

    SELF DEFENSE

    LIFE

    SUICIDE

    EUTHENASIA

    ABORTION / EXPOSURE

    AGE OF CONSENT

    AGE OF CONCEPTION

    PEDOPHILIA

    PEDOPHILIC INCEST

    INCEST

    PROSTITUTION

    HOMOSEXUAL RELATIONS

    HOMOSEXUAL ‘MARRIAGE’

    MARRIAGE

    MISTRESSES AND LOVERS

    POLYGAMY

    SPANKING

    GENERATIONS

    REPRODUCTION

    MISCAGENATION

    EUGENICS

    GENETIC modification

    ARTIFICIAL REPRODUCTION

    TRANSHUMANISM LIFEBOAT

    CONFLICT

    FREEDOM OF SPEECH

    Freedom of Speech

    [include page=’freedom-of-speech-under-propertarianism’ content=’display’]

    INTERPERSONAL SPEECH

    DEFAMATION: GOSSIP, LIBEL, AND SLANDER

    ON THE DUEL

    THE BAD

    POVERTY

    DISEASE

    ADDICTION

    SOCIOPATHY

    MENTAL ILLNESS

    CONSPIRACY THEORIES

    [insert page=’conspiracy’ display=’content’]

    CRIME

    DRUGS AND ALCOHOL

    BRIBERY

    BLACKMAIL

    ‘SCALPING’

    INTEREST / USURY

    [insert page=’2020/05/27/usury’ content=’display’]

    “DERIVATIVES / I NSTRUMENTS”

    RESTITUTION

    PUNISHMENT

    FAILURE OF SOCIAL SCIENCE — PUNISHMENT

    SLAVERY

    OTHERS

    ASSOCIATION AND EXCLUSION

    CLASS AND CLASSISM

    RACE AND RACISM

    OTHER CIVILIZATIONS, CULTURES, AND CLANS

    ANIMALS

    DRONES

    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCES

    THE AI QUESTION AND THE ANSWER

    THE PROBLEM ISN’T THE AI, BUT IT’S WARRANTOR

    ALIENS

    MATTERS OF WAR

    PROPAGANDA AND INFORMATION

    IMMIGRATION

    CONVERSION

    RELIGION

    WAR

    TRADE CONFLICT

    COLONIALISM

    CONQUEST

    CONQUEST

    RULE

    THE MARKET

    Why and how Markets work

    THE LIMIT OF MARKETS

    WEIGHTS AND MEASURES

    LICENSES

    PRODUCT SAFETY

    INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

    MONOPOLY

    WORKDAYS

    HOLIDAYS

    TERRITORIAL COMMONS

    CITIES, SUBURBS AND RURAL COMMUNITIES

    SCALE

    DENSITY

    ARCHITECTURE

    ORGANIZATION (LAYOUT)

    ZONING

    SPATIAL COMMONS

    RESOURCES

    THE LAND AIR AND SEAS

    SPACE (EXTRA TERRESTRIAL)

    MONUMENTS

    POLLUTION

    THE INFORMATIONAL COMMONS

    PUBLIC SPEECH

    THE POLITICIANS

    THE MEDIA SOCIAL MEDIA

    The Law on Media Content

    [insert page=’the-natural-law-on-media-content’ display=’content’]

    THE ACADEMY

    THE EDUCATORS

    THE CHURCH

    LIfe After Death

    [insert page=’life-after-death’ display=’content’]

    INSURANCE

    NATURAL DISASTERS/ DAMAG ES

    FAMINE/THE WATER IN THE DESERT/SHORTAGES

    POVERTY/CHARITY/SHORTAGES

    SHELTER: WINTER AND SUMMER

    DISEASE

  • PART 5 – Findings of the Law

    THE GOOD

    PLEASURE

    CHOICE

    VALUE

    PREFERENCE

    GOOD

    VIOLENCE

    LOYALTY

    EMPATHY

    PANDERING

    TOLERANCE —“Once you see that extending tolerance to immoral political behavior is ITSELF immoral, you can’t un-see it.”—Michael Churchill

    TOLERATING A KNOWN THEFT

    CHARITY

    FAIRNESS

    EQUALITY

    FEMINISM

    FEMININITY

    MASCULINITY

    IDENTITY

    SELF DEFENSE

    LIFE

    SUICIDE

    EUTHENASIA

    ABORTION / EXPOSURE

    AGE OF CONSENT

    AGE OF CONCEPTION

    PEDOPHILIA

    PEDOPHILIC INCEST

    INCEST

    PROSTITUTION

    HOMOSEXUAL RELATIONS

    HOMOSEXUAL ‘MARRIAGE’

    MARRIAGE

    MISTRESSES AND LOVERS

    POLYGAMY

    SPANKING

    GENERATIONS

    REPRODUCTION

    MISCAGENATION

    EUGENICS

    GENETIC modification

    ARTIFICIAL REPRODUCTION

    TRANSHUMANISM LIFEBOAT

    CONFLICT

    FREEDOM OF SPEECH

    Freedom of Speech

    [include page=’freedom-of-speech-under-propertarianism’ content=’display’]

    INTERPERSONAL SPEECH

    DEFAMATION: GOSSIP, LIBEL, AND SLANDER

    ON THE DUEL

    THE BAD

    POVERTY

    DISEASE

    ADDICTION

    SOCIOPATHY

    MENTAL ILLNESS

    CONSPIRACY THEORIES

    [insert page=’conspiracy’ display=’content’]

    CRIME

    DRUGS AND ALCOHOL

    BRIBERY

    BLACKMAIL

    ‘SCALPING’

    INTEREST / USURY

    [insert page=’2020/05/27/usury’ content=’display’]

    “DERIVATIVES / I NSTRUMENTS”

    RESTITUTION

    PUNISHMENT

    FAILURE OF SOCIAL SCIENCE — PUNISHMENT

    SLAVERY

    OTHERS

    ASSOCIATION AND EXCLUSION

    CLASS AND CLASSISM

    RACE AND RACISM

    OTHER CIVILIZATIONS, CULTURES, AND CLANS

    ANIMALS

    DRONES

    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCES

    THE AI QUESTION AND THE ANSWER

    THE PROBLEM ISN’T THE AI, BUT IT’S WARRANTOR

    ALIENS

    MATTERS OF WAR

    PROPAGANDA AND INFORMATION

    IMMIGRATION

    CONVERSION

    RELIGION

    WAR

    TRADE CONFLICT

    COLONIALISM

    CONQUEST

    CONQUEST

    RULE

    THE MARKET

    Why and how Markets work

    THE LIMIT OF MARKETS

    WEIGHTS AND MEASURES

    LICENSES

    PRODUCT SAFETY

    INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

    MONOPOLY

    WORKDAYS

    HOLIDAYS

    TERRITORIAL COMMONS

    CITIES, SUBURBS AND RURAL COMMUNITIES

    SCALE

    DENSITY

    ARCHITECTURE

    ORGANIZATION (LAYOUT)

    ZONING

    SPATIAL COMMONS

    RESOURCES

    THE LAND AIR AND SEAS

    SPACE (EXTRA TERRESTRIAL)

    MONUMENTS

    POLLUTION

    THE INFORMATIONAL COMMONS

    PUBLIC SPEECH

    THE POLITICIANS

    THE MEDIA SOCIAL MEDIA

    The Law on Media Content

    [insert page=’the-natural-law-on-media-content’ display=’content’]

    THE ACADEMY

    THE EDUCATORS

    THE CHURCH

    LIfe After Death

    [insert page=’life-after-death’ display=’content’]

    INSURANCE

    NATURAL DISASTERS/ DAMAG ES

    FAMINE/THE WATER IN THE DESERT/SHORTAGES

    POVERTY/CHARITY/SHORTAGES

    SHELTER: WINTER AND SUMMER

    DISEASE

  • P-Law criminalizes (a) bringing a bill to violate the natural law or the constit

    P-Law criminalizes (a) bringing a bill to violate the natural law or the constitution before the legislatures, (b) advocating for, (c) even speaking about it in public, to the public.

    Our Natural Law is sacred.

    Even speaking of violating it means loss of sovereignty, lost of reciprocity under it, loss of rights under reciprocity, and loss of defense, exposing you to extra judicial punishment within the territory and letter of marque external to it.

    P-Law is harsher than islamic law.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-17 17:01:00 UTC

  • DEMARCATION SHOULD BE Sheriffs are elected. Sheriffs are responsible for civil l

    DEMARCATION SHOULD BE

    Sheriffs are elected.

    Sheriffs are responsible for civil law

    Sheriffs are responsible for territories,

    Police are employees.

    Police for criminal law.

    Police are responsible for cities.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-17 14:36:00 UTC