Curt Doolittle

Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence

  • P EMPHASIZES THE COURT (effective) NOT VOTING (ineffective)

    Feb 11, 2020, 9:11 PM by John Mark [I]n any nation there will be capable and incapable people, wealthy and poor, etc – all across the spectrum. There is a huge difference between giving less capable people (who often tend to vote for free stuff stolen from others) “via-negativa” power thru P-law (the power to STOP violations of reciprocity) and giving them “via-positiva” power thru voting (the power to INITIATE violations of reciprocity). The Propertarian system does NOT allow less capable (often parasite-minded) people the ability to INITIATE violations of reciprocity, and at the same time it DOES allow everyone to stop violations of reciprocity. So you can see it solves 2 problems at once: It TAKES AWAY via-positiva initiating power from a demographic that has a majority of parasite-instinct people, and GIVES via-negativa power to STOP violations of reciprocity, to everyone. And under P-Law the average person WILL have MUCH more power to counter the well-heeled than today. First, keep in mind that poor people even today often have no trouble getting legal representation when the lawyers believe there is strong chance of a big financial reward. P-Law would provide significant $ rewards – violators of reciprocity will have to pay damages, and the richer the violator, the greater the financial reward for taking them to court will be in many cases. Second, under P-Law there will be very few if any frivolous lawsuits because loser has to pay extra damages. This reduces/eliminates the ability of rich people to use their wealth to “play the lawsuit game” as a tool of control over the poor. Everyone regardless of wealth level will be much more careful about their actions and words in general (so as not to end up in court by violating reciprocity), and careful about going to court (poor people if they have a good case will have no trouble finding a good lawyer, rich people will not be able to use frivolous lawsuits to intimidate & wear out opposition). (Curt has thought this through very thoroughly. People just need to stick around long enough to find out that the multiple changes outlined in the propertarian system fix multiple problems as well as they can be fixed, keeping in mind that no fix will be 100% perfect.)

    —“The importance of voting is evidence the American experiment failed. The greater the importance, the greater the evidence, the greater the failure.”— Luke Weinhagen

  • Free Speech Means Free TRUTHFUL Speech

    Free Speech Means Free TRUTHFUL Speech https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/14/free-speech-means-free-truthful-speech/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-14 15:37:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1228342575968538626

  • Free Speech Means Free TRUTHFUL Speech

    Feb 13, 2020, 7:52 AM

    —“Free speech is free TRUTHFUL speech. Not carte blanche to spread false allegations, lies, deception, or accusations without a demonstrated attempt at due diligence for truth. You don’t get to be a lying parasite. Your resistance proves your desire for continued parasitism. Under P-Law, truthful speech is always protected. P-Law serves as the Raid for lying deceitful parasites that the left tends to breed like roaches. Your continued slander proves only that you have no real invested time in learning Propertarianism, or do not have the cranial capacity to fully understand Propertarianism. Neither are a good excuse to troll these pages with your ill conceived illogical commentary on a subject matter you clearly have no understanding of… ..”—Clinton McLaggan

  • Free Speech Means Free TRUTHFUL Speech

    Feb 13, 2020, 7:52 AM

    —“Free speech is free TRUTHFUL speech. Not carte blanche to spread false allegations, lies, deception, or accusations without a demonstrated attempt at due diligence for truth. You don’t get to be a lying parasite. Your resistance proves your desire for continued parasitism. Under P-Law, truthful speech is always protected. P-Law serves as the Raid for lying deceitful parasites that the left tends to breed like roaches. Your continued slander proves only that you have no real invested time in learning Propertarianism, or do not have the cranial capacity to fully understand Propertarianism. Neither are a good excuse to troll these pages with your ill conceived illogical commentary on a subject matter you clearly have no understanding of… ..”—Clinton McLaggan

  • The P Constitution Isn’t a Request for Approval

    Feb 13, 2020, 10:15 AM [I] don’t think it’s coming across. We aren’t trying to get consensus on reciprocity under some form of a P constitution. We’re saying that the only reason not to conquer, deprive, rule, tax, enserf, enslave, or much worse, is under reciprocity – and there is no possibility to counter it.

  • The P Constitution Isn’t a Request for Approval

    Feb 13, 2020, 10:15 AM [I] don’t think it’s coming across. We aren’t trying to get consensus on reciprocity under some form of a P constitution. We’re saying that the only reason not to conquer, deprive, rule, tax, enserf, enslave, or much worse, is under reciprocity – and there is no possibility to counter it.

  • THE P CONSTITUTION ISN’T A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL I don’t think it’s coming across

    THE P CONSTITUTION ISN’T A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL

    I don’t think it’s coming across. We aren’t trying to get consensus on reciprocity under some form of a P constitution. We’re saying that the only reason not to conquer, deprive, rule, tax, enserf, enslave, or much worse, is under reciprocity – and there is no possible to counter it.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-13 10:15:00 UTC

  • “Free speech is free TRUTHFUL speech. Not carte blanche to spread false allegati

    —“Free speech is free TRUTHFUL speech. Not carte blanche to spread false allegations, lies, deception, or accusations without a demonstrated attempt at due diligence for truth. You don’t get to be a lying parasite. Your resistance proves your desire for continued parasitism. Under P-Law, truthful speech is always protected. P-Law serves as the Raid for lying deceitful parasites that the left tends to breed like roaches. Your continued slander proves only that you have no real invested time in learning Propertarianism, or do not have the cranial capacity to fully understand Propertarianism. Neither are a good excuse to troll these pages with your ill conceived illogical commentary on a subject matter you clearly have no understanding of… ..”—Clinton McLaggan

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-13 07:52:00 UTC

  • P EMPHASIZES THE COURT (effective) NOT VOTING (ineffective) by John Mark In any

    P EMPHASIZES THE COURT (effective) NOT VOTING (ineffective)

    by John Mark

    In any nation there will be capable and incapable people, wealthy and poor, etc – all across the spectrum.

    There is a huge difference between giving less capable people (who often tend to vote for free stuff stolen from others) “via-negativa” power thru P-law (the power to STOP violations of reciprocity) and giving them “via-positiva” power thru voting (the power to INITIATE violations of reciprocity).

    The Propertarian system does NOT allow less capable (often parasite-minded) people the ability to INITIATE violations of reciprocity, and at the same time it DOES allow everyone to stop violations of reciprocity. So you can see it solves 2 problems at once: It TAKES AWAY via-positiva initiating power from a demographic that has a majority of parasite-instinct people, and GIVES via-negativa power to STOP violations of reciprocity, to everyone.

    And under P-Law the average person WILL have MUCH more power to counter the well-heeled than today.

    First, keep in mind that poor people even today often have no trouble getting legal representation when the lawyers believe their is strong chance of a big financial reward. P-Law would provide significant $ rewards – violators of reciprocity will have to pay damages, and the richer the violator, the greater the financial reward for taking them to court will be in many cases.

    Second, under P-Law there will be very few if any frivolous lawsuits because loser has to pay extra damages. This reduces/eliminates the ability of rich people to use their wealth to “play the lawsuit game” as a tool of control over the poor. Everyone regardless of wealth level will be much more careful about their actions and words in general (so as not to end up in court by violating reciprocity), and careful about going to court (poor people if they have a good case will have no trouble finding a good lawyer, rich people will not be able to use frivolous lawsuits to intimidate & wear out opposition).

    (Curt has thought this through very thoroughly. People just need to stick around long enough to find out that the multiple changes outlined in the propertarian system fix multiple problems as well as they can be fixed, keeping in mind that no fix will be 100% perfect.)

    —

    —“The importance of voting is evidence the American experiment failed. The greater the importance, the greater the evidence, the greater the failure.”— Luke Weinhagen

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 21:11:00 UTC

  • monarchs tried repeatedly to override customary (natural) law

    monarchs tried repeatedly to override customary (natural) law.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-10 21:50:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1226986933907316737

    Reply addressees: @EricLiford

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1226984297812373505

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1226984297812373505