Our Law: The Inalienablity of Sovereignty https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/25/our-law-the-inalienablity-of-sovereignty/
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 20:27:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232401857219305475
Our Law: The Inalienablity of Sovereignty https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/25/our-law-the-inalienablity-of-sovereignty/
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 20:27:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232401857219305475
[S]overeigns cannot ‘give it up to god’ – that is an act of alienation of responsibility. A sovereign can neither surrender his rights or his responsibilities without breaking the contract for reciprocal insurance of sovereignty. This is why we must have stoicism in mind, and epicureanism in life. One is sovereign or not. Aristocracy requires sovereignty – the cult of non-submission. So we may need to face our permanent inequality of those who are sovereign for who responsibility is inalienable, and those who are serfs for whom responsibility is alienated by submission
[S]overeigns cannot ‘give it up to god’ – that is an act of alienation of responsibility. A sovereign can neither surrender his rights or his responsibilities without breaking the contract for reciprocal insurance of sovereignty. This is why we must have stoicism in mind, and epicureanism in life. One is sovereign or not. Aristocracy requires sovereignty – the cult of non-submission. So we may need to face our permanent inequality of those who are sovereign for who responsibility is inalienable, and those who are serfs for whom responsibility is alienated by submission
[W]ar crimes exist only under (a) Westphalian state responsibility for actions of all citizens and their agents – a monopoly on violence. (b) Soldiers under direction of the state. War crimes were necessary under state run warfare in order to i) license states’ wars of aggression, ii) with conscripted soldiers, and iii) protecting the populace from harm, iiv) while preventing escalation that will prohibit the population from tolerating cessation and settlement. In other words the purpose of war crimes is to facilitate the cooperation of the population with the state in the conduct of the state’s war. Otherwise, war is war and there are no limits on behavior, and all else is pretense and deceit. Islam broke the Westphalian peace with islamic terrorism Russia broke the postwar consensus by seizing Ukraine. We are in fourth generation warfare: the end of the european domestication of warfare. The state no longer has or can have control over the monopoly of violence. The non-state actors are more effective at fourth generation warfare in urban environments than are states and armor in the fields. TOTAL WAR Total war is warfare that includes any and all civilian-associated resources and infrastructure as legitimate military targets, mobilizes all of the resources of society to fight the war, and gives priority to warfare over non-combatant needs. The Oxford Living Dictionaries defines “total war” as “A war that is unrestricted in terms of the weapons used, the territory or combatants involved, or the objectives pursued, especially one in which the laws of war are disregarded.” Fourth-generation Warfare (Premodern Warfare) Fourth-generation warfare (4GW) is conflict characterized by a blurring of the lines between war and politics, combatants and civilians. The term was first used in 1980 by a team of United States analysts, including William S. Lind, to describe warfare’s return to a decentralized form. In terms of generational modern warfare, the fourth generation signifies the nation states’ loss of their near-monopoly on combat forces, returning to modes of conflict common in pre-modern times. The treaties of Westphalia brought to an end a calamitous period of European history which caused the deaths of approximately eight million people. Scholars have identified Westphalia as the beginning of the modern international system, based on the concept of Westphalian sovereignty, though this interpretation has been challenged.
[W]ar crimes exist only under (a) Westphalian state responsibility for actions of all citizens and their agents – a monopoly on violence. (b) Soldiers under direction of the state. War crimes were necessary under state run warfare in order to i) license states’ wars of aggression, ii) with conscripted soldiers, and iii) protecting the populace from harm, iiv) while preventing escalation that will prohibit the population from tolerating cessation and settlement. In other words the purpose of war crimes is to facilitate the cooperation of the population with the state in the conduct of the state’s war. Otherwise, war is war and there are no limits on behavior, and all else is pretense and deceit. Islam broke the Westphalian peace with islamic terrorism Russia broke the postwar consensus by seizing Ukraine. We are in fourth generation warfare: the end of the european domestication of warfare. The state no longer has or can have control over the monopoly of violence. The non-state actors are more effective at fourth generation warfare in urban environments than are states and armor in the fields. TOTAL WAR Total war is warfare that includes any and all civilian-associated resources and infrastructure as legitimate military targets, mobilizes all of the resources of society to fight the war, and gives priority to warfare over non-combatant needs. The Oxford Living Dictionaries defines “total war” as “A war that is unrestricted in terms of the weapons used, the territory or combatants involved, or the objectives pursued, especially one in which the laws of war are disregarded.” Fourth-generation Warfare (Premodern Warfare) Fourth-generation warfare (4GW) is conflict characterized by a blurring of the lines between war and politics, combatants and civilians. The term was first used in 1980 by a team of United States analysts, including William S. Lind, to describe warfare’s return to a decentralized form. In terms of generational modern warfare, the fourth generation signifies the nation states’ loss of their near-monopoly on combat forces, returning to modes of conflict common in pre-modern times. The treaties of Westphalia brought to an end a calamitous period of European history which caused the deaths of approximately eight million people. Scholars have identified Westphalia as the beginning of the modern international system, based on the concept of Westphalian sovereignty, though this interpretation has been challenged.
Recent Work: Most of my offline work tries to solve inalienability under sovereignty. inalienation: “You cannot surrender your rights without surrendering your sovereignty and thereby defecting from and committing treason against your peers.” The more I learned P the angrier I became at the postwar jewish invasion of western thought. But the more I understand our original group strategy and our law, the more complete it is and the more ELEGANT it is as an extension of the laws of nature – rather than one that seeks to deceive men.
Recent Work: Most of my offline work tries to solve inalienability under sovereignty. inalienation: “You cannot surrender your rights without surrendering your sovereignty and thereby defecting from and committing treason against your peers.” The more I learned P the angrier I became at the postwar jewish invasion of western thought. But the more I understand our original group strategy and our law, the more complete it is and the more ELEGANT it is as an extension of the laws of nature – rather than one that seeks to deceive men.
Depends on how much detail I want to get into. See constitution > the law > jurisprudence for full explanation.
Rule of law(natural), Rule by Rights(enumerated), Rule by legislation(contract), Rule by Discretion(bureaucracy), Rule by command(authority).
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 17:49:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232361925398409217
Reply addressees: @ClownBa73413423
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232346434135085058
Ethnocentrism, Sovereignty: Rule of Law – Its Enough. https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/25/ethnocentrism-sovereignty-rule-of-law-its-enough/
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 13:41:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232299465698152448
The Via- Positiva Small, homogenous, low power distance, polities under rule of law, and their naturally limited capacity for fiat currency inflation demonstrate the optimum mixed economies for both trade and redistribution. The optimum organization of such a polity is by Sovereignty, Rule of law of Reciprocity, an independent cult of the judiciary, a universal militia, a standing professional army of warriors, a monarchy as a judge of last resort, houses for the classes demonstrating contribution to the commons for the production of commons. And markets in everything. Ethnocentrism is the optimum group strategy because kin selection favors – or at least doesn’t resist – loyalty, high trust, commons, and redistribution. Ethno-supremacism is a necessary property of ethnocentrism. Europeans are demonstrably superior genetically, culturally, scientifically, medically, technologically, institutionally, civilizationally to all other civilizations in the ancient and modern worlds. And we are so for one reason: sovereignty. Everything in our civilization descends from it.