Culling the bottom is the MOST effective and rapid means of improving the status of a population. They are a drag on the rest. And as technology increases, this will only exacerbate the problem. The Great Fliter? It’s eugenics. That’s the Great Filter. Failure of soft eugenics.
Reply addressees: @321Traveler @Shahydat @kenationalist_ @MaMo_ @DNy1818
Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science
-
Culling the bottom is the MOST effective and rapid means of improving the status
-
Culling the bottom is the MOST effective and rapid means of improving the status
Culling the bottom is the MOST effective and rapid means of improving the status of a population. They are a drag on the rest. And as technology increases, this will only exacerbate the problem. The Great Fliter? It’s eugenics. That’s the Great Filter. Failure of soft eugenics.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-15 18:04:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1283462506376237062
Reply addressees: @321Traveler @Shahydat @kenationalist_ @MaMo_ @DNy1818
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1283453330405064707
-
RT @Hail__To_You: “At 15 IQ points of difference you have an advantage, but at 3
RT @Hail__To_You: “At 15 IQ points of difference you have an advantage, but at 30 points, our frames of reference become significantly diff…
-
RT @Hail__To_You: “At 15 IQ points of difference you have an advantage, but at 3
RT @Hail__To_You: “At 15 IQ points of difference you have an advantage, but at 30 points, our frames of reference become significantly diff…
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-15 14:41:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1283411485205700609
-
I don’t hate people. Hate like anger makes you dim. It makes you care about triv
I don’t hate people. Hate like anger makes you dim. It makes you care about trivialities. You hate people because you think they have agency – and are in control of themselves. But very few of us have agency, and everyone else is running archaic software that needs an upgrade. From my position of agency, the world is full of children running with scissors. And only men of agency, who create institutions to limit the harm people do to one another are capable of teaching them deliberately in education, normatively by saturation, and legally by the threat of punishment. Men of agency need the power to do that. those who lack agency need to fight to give men of agency the power to do that.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-14 13:04:00 UTC
-
Democratic fallacy. In the USA it’s criminality first, and poverty second. The r
Democratic fallacy. In the USA it’s criminality first, and poverty second. The reason appears to be rates of maturity causing differences in agency (self-control) only early training fixes it (religion, discipline, military).
Crime reflects neotonic distributions (races)
Reply addressees: @jparsons_jp @JulieBorowski -
Democratic fallacy. In the USA it’s criminality first, and poverty second. The r
Democratic fallacy. In the USA it’s criminality first, and poverty second. The reason appears to be rates of maturity causing differences in agency (self-control) only early training fixes it (religion, discipline, military).
Crime reflects neotonic distributions (races)
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-14 04:21:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1282893017511272448
Reply addressees: @jparsons_jp @JulieBorowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1282874206993223680
-
AFAIK IQ over 140 produces side effects. Optimum is probably 115. It’s relativel
AFAIK IQ over 140 produces side effects. Optimum is probably 115. It’s relatively easy to get there by lower the rate of reproduction at the bottom by paying them not to reproduce.
Reply addressees: @DonnieDopeNeedl @CruiserGurgess @MrMatt444 @RightSide4Life @frendiferous @KeithWoodsYT -
AFAIK IQ over 140 produces side effects. Optimum is probably 115. It’s relativel
AFAIK IQ over 140 produces side effects. Optimum is probably 115. It’s relatively easy to get there by lower the rate of reproduction at the bottom by paying them not to reproduce.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-12 23:01:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1282450040942886912
Reply addressees: @DonnieDopeNeedl @CruiserGurgess @MrMatt444 @RightSide4Life @frendiferous @KeithWoodsYT
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1282449617871949832
-
Morality doesn’t seem to change with IQ, only the kind of immorality people prac
Morality doesn’t seem to change with IQ, only the kind of immorality people practice. So no.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-12 23:00:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1282449775204478979
Reply addressees: @DonnieDopeNeedl @CruiserGurgess @MrMatt444 @RightSide4Life @frendiferous @KeithWoodsYT
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1282449650776244225