Evolution has no end. It does however contain a certain set of logics that regulate the conservation of energy, that it evolved over time. outbreeding is only useful to destroy competitors, to enfranchise them, to capture benefits from them, to reproduce under duress (survival).
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-29 19:14:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321893232138223621
Reply addressees: @PotsPol
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321891205282746368
Now this isn’t particularly uncommon because unless you’re familiar with my work in testimony or with the economics of behavior, you might ‘think small’ like most people. But the point is you didn’t ask. But you doubled down by claiming I was using your definition. (I wouldn’t)
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-29 19:12:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321892680784355329
Reply addressees: @PotsPol
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321891427475955718
How does an organism identify kin?
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-29 19:02:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321890185542586368
Reply addressees: @PotsPol
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321889857665466368
Again, “species” refers universally demonstrated koinophillia, kin selection, and kin preference which all including humans, demonstrate, within the limits of duress and opportunity. In other words, all biological systems demonstrate the same process out of physical necessity.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-29 18:56:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321888582844342273
Reply addressees: @PotsPol
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321881819705462787
So it’s not just that I’m right it’s that the definition explains WHY taxonomies are by and large categorically consistent – well except for humans. And explains the dispute over humans. We are apparently magically free of physical natural and evolutionary laws. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-29 18:52:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321887634151641088
Reply addressees: @PotsPol
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321887228822495232
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@PotsPol So the methodology I (we) use is disambiguation of causality by serialization. In other words we define processes(operations in time) not states (sets w/o time). So instead of seeking to understand you sought to falsify.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1321887228822495232
Um. Try to read that a few times. lol The behavioral demonstration of kinship is demonstrated by reproductive preference out of evolutionary necessity – within the limits of opportunity (advantage) and risk (failure). Ie: universal koinophillia and kin selection.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-29 18:25:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321880871457140738
Reply addressees: @PotsPol
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321879203755761666
So is the criteria for speciation both descriptively and causally the spectrum of reproductive preference as I’ve defined it as the economy of opportunity and risk under plenty and duress, the means by which species evolve and are categorized with or without human intentions?
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-29 18:20:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321879517636534273
Reply addressees: @PotsPol
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321878947358015488
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@PotsPol Here is what you are doing: “Have you stopped beating your wife yet?” Well, I haven’t ever beaten my wife. So is xyz the only criteria as you define it or as I define it? I define it as a spectrum in the economy of reproductive preference and you are using verbalism of sophists.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1321878947358015488
What do you think in-pool and reproductive preference refers to other than the sequence: reproductive necessity > ability > bias > preference > dispreference > infertility > impossibility? Why do all species demonstrate kin selection and koinophillia? Why do species do so?
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-29 18:15:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321878459510099970
Reply addressees: @PotsPol
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321877451815981059
I can’t figure out if you’re dishonest or stupid. lol
1) Was mating with grandparents possible (no)
2) Is inbreeding a preference (no)
3) Do either of those falsify in-pool preference in reproduction? (no)
4) Do increases in cognitive ability increase reproductive oppy? (yes).
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-29 17:37:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321868894156529665
Reply addressees: @PotsPol
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321866809092562946
I am. I am also a specialist in human methods of error bias and deceit. While there are opinions, the evidence of all classification at least other than humans (the lie) is that taxonomic classes are determined as I said ( and must be ).
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-29 16:30:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321851882881560576
Reply addressees: @PotsPol @RonNoble7 @ThruTheHayes @WorMartiN @Nationalist7346
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321850055595331584