I couldn’t quite message that completely in a tweet.
My meaning is that we need both empathic mom and systemic dad to reach a people on domestic social and economic-political . 😉
Monarchies are superior to presidents.
Source date (UTC): 2022-08-26 20:22:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1563260733038948356
Reply addressees: @Nefertiiti @SpicyAboki
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1563258712231292929
Good point. However, most people still favor male ‘bosses’ over female precisely because males don’t tolerate female pettiness. However,’beta males’ and ‘rational females’ like those that dominate academic STEM, to communicate innovations of systematizers, is the optimum pairing.
Source date (UTC): 2022-08-26 20:21:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1563260320776216576
Reply addressees: @Nefertiiti @SpicyAboki
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1563258712231292929
–That’s perhaps the update to Haidt that we were looking for. Instead of the care foundation, you now have foundations for evasion vs pursuit of responsibility.–Martin Stepan
Source date (UTC): 2022-08-26 20:18:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1563259545454911488
While it’s true that in math, science, engineering, technology, economics, and strategy the male model of systematizing is superior in every discipline. It’s also true that in the ‘discipline’ of organizing people the female model of empathizing, words, and pictures reigns.
Source date (UTC): 2022-08-26 19:53:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1563253297703559169
Sex differences in cognition.
1 – sex differences are the causal axis of all human differences.
2 – female empathizing vs male systematizing are the causal axis of all differences in human cognitive bias.
3 – Male distribution is wider than female distribution.
Source date (UTC): 2022-08-26 19:47:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1563251741587828742
Reply addressees: @DualityofHan
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1563250923610075137
Let me help you: Why do you not grasp that this bias in interpretation is the subject of the discussion, illustrating cognitive differences in suggestion using continuous recursive disambiguation of ordinary language grammar?
Do you not understand what we’re doing here? (no)
Source date (UTC): 2022-08-26 19:42:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1563250658568196097
Reply addressees: @dhegdeer @horseshoegorg0n
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1563248570740125699
No you are just behind the curve.
Male cog bias is general rule assuming outliers (inequality) to take advantage of adaptive returns (adults).
Female cog bias is absolute rule egaggerating outliers (equality) to evade adaptive costs (children).
Graph it as supply demand.
Source date (UTC): 2022-08-26 19:40:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1563250140508725248
Reply addressees: @dhegdeer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1563249159343247361
Again ironic. A general rule refers to a distribution(most). an attempt to claim a general rule is not a distribution. There are no absolute rules in behavioral science. All statements of behavior refer to distributions.
Sets failed, math, logic, and econ – Operationalism didn’t.
Source date (UTC): 2022-08-26 19:36:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1563249101596008450
Reply addressees: @dhegdeer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1563247407499923457
IRONY: You just demonstrated the fallacy. Males comprehend all sets as distributions. I could have included the CogFem literal vs general fallacy, as means of justifying a NAXALT/AXALT fallacy.
You did it for me.
BTW: Try to find a leftist that doesn’t rely on CogFem.
Any?
Source date (UTC): 2022-08-26 19:30:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1563247423111462913
Reply addressees: @dhegdeer @horseshoegorg0n
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1563245896669999104
Twitter character limit.
Female genetic origin = feminine empathizing cognitive bias seeking emotional consistency to limit adaptive costs: feels.
-vs-
Male genetic origin = Masculine systematizing cognitive bias seeking logical consistency to maximize adaptive rewards: reals.
Source date (UTC): 2022-08-26 19:25:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1563246348136517637
Reply addressees: @horseshoegorg0n @dhegdeer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1563244298165882891