Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • THE QUARTILES OF ARGUMENTS REFLECT THE CLASSES (by James Augustus Berens) Stupid

    THE QUARTILES OF ARGUMENTS REFLECT THE CLASSES

    (by James Augustus Berens)

    Stupid people trash talk, the normal but-not bright propagandize, the smart market, and the elite construct.

    1) Lower-quartile: unable to discriminate between Truth (good information) and falsehood (bad information), resulting in using other people (the group) as a means of decidability. Usually results in distrust in out-groups. Forms groups on phenotypical similarity.

    2) Lower-middle quartile: beginnings of wrote memory & verbal reasoning skills, but must rely on upper-quartile for competing sets of information, This is where selection-bias occurs; the means of decidability is intuited self-interest, along a short-medium term time horizon. Forms groups around common interest as opposed to genetic relatedness.

    3) Upper-middle quartile: well developed verbal reasoning skills, empiricism, can produce information to organize lower-quartiles. Limited by theoretical frame-work constructed by upper. Forms meritocratic groups.

    4) Upper-quartile: ratio-scientific, can produce frameworks to organize information, means of decidability strict-construction (external, internal, scope, identity, existential, & moral consistency). Forms groups around quality of information produced.

    —James Augustus Berens


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 16:22:00 UTC

  • Look, if you aren’t producing a replacement generation: a marriage with (2+kids)

    Look, if you aren’t producing a replacement generation: a marriage with (2+kids), producing goods services and information: owning and managing a business, or managing a territory: a governor, you’re just a consumer of other people’s generational investments, productive investments, and commons investments. I can understand having a ‘house of peasantry’ for the unproductive classes, but I see no reason that the votes of each class have equal weight. That’s absurd.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 12:30:00 UTC

  • THE CENTRAL PROBLEM OF THE 2OTH CENTURY IS A FAILURE OF SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY, LAW

    THE CENTRAL PROBLEM OF THE 2OTH CENTURY IS A FAILURE OF SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY, LAW, AND INSTITUTIONS, TO AMELIORATE THE SUICIDAL URGES OF WOMEN.

    There are good and bad people in every clan, tribe, and race. Some have just been better that others at eliminating different kinds of bad.

    Whites have notably been TERRIBLE at eliminating the bad trait of FEMALE SOLIPSISM or developing laws to limit its damage, before granting women the franchise with which to express their need to care for children upon non-kin and competitors.

    Women, demonstrably, and empirically, are mentally unable to vote unless married with children, so that their ‘urges’ are occupied at home, and not expressed as inappropriate urges in the commons.

    Men have these urges: sex, violence, and risk. But we have spent millennia, constraining the danger of those urges through domestication and institutional evolution.

    We have not spent the same time constraining women. And it’s more than obvious that we must do so. Since their urges, expressed in the voting booth, direct their nest and nurture instincts outside of the home, and to provide access, comfort, and resources to what are evidentially our competitors and enemies.

    WE BLAME THE COMPETITOR NOT OUR WOMEN, AND NOT OURSELVES.

    Is it true that the cosmopolitan jews, in all their forms, but in particular, their new religion of Cultural Marxism and the Scripture of Critical Theory, and the Fictitious History of Marxism, had found willing soil in our young, unmarried women? Yes. Is it true that the Academy, freshly licensed by Darwin’s defeat of the Church, but whose revolution in science limited the Academy’s market, seized upon this new intellectual product as a means of profiting from the postwar underclass, and newly enriched women,

    A woman over the age of 21 that does not have at least one child is a threat to civilization because she cannot control her urges for nesting, consumption, and the IRRESPONSIBLE satisfaction of her urges for caretaking by employing them against the interests of kin.

    That’s not an opinion but a statement of the empirical evidence of the experiments of the various societies in the 20th century.

    So there are many ways of controlling the impulses of women without children to harm the polity and our kin. The most obvious being to deprive them of the vote until they are able to manage their urges. Just as we deprive men of their ability to vote if they cannot manage their urges. The difference is only that men require physical restraint, and women require verbal and political restraint.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 11:33:00 UTC

  • all self reporting on moral bias is false. most self reporting on policy is true

    all self reporting on moral bias is false. most self reporting on policy is true.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 10:34:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796299965974790144

    Reply addressees: @Olivianuzzi

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796293591798779904


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable β€” we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796293591798779904

  • The consequences of prolificacy under pressure. Fixed. Reposted. Thx. πŸ˜‰

    The consequences of prolificacy under pressure. Fixed. Reposted. Thx. πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-08 17:32:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796042626243903489

    Reply addressees: @harrison_partch @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/795992421813354496


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable β€” we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/795992421813354496

  • THE INCREASE IN MALE SUICIDE IS EVIDENCE OF WOMEN’S ABANDONMENT OF THE EXCHANGE

    THE INCREASE IN MALE SUICIDE IS EVIDENCE OF WOMEN’S ABANDONMENT OF THE EXCHANGE OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY. SO WHY NOT ABANDON THE EXCHANGE OF LIMITING OUR ENSLAVEMENT IN EXCHANGE FOR MARRIAGE?

    There is no reason to remove women from domesticated slavery if the consequence is their abandonment of the compromise of marriage, early calorie transfer, and late return. If we are to live late and uncared for seeking suicide in ever greater numbers so that women can expand their insatiable nesting urge, including the consumption of our millennia of accumulated genetic, cultural, institutional, normative, informational, and material capital, then there is no value in our release of them from slavery into the market for production.

    In other words, it is either marriage and family before individual, so that we equally benefit from the intertemporal demands of our biology, or we might as well just return women to domestic slavery.

    It’s not complicated. Marriage and reproductive constraint is a compromise. Break the exchange and we do not retain the redistributive benefits of female participation in the market men have made, but instead, we return to that prior era where the market is the domain of men, and women are once again herded for our purposes like all other animals.

    None of us gets what we want. We get only the best that is possible.

    Everyone in every civilization thinks their norms are a force of gravity. But the only force of gravity in human existence is ability to organize to use violence to obtain what we desire over that which others desire – in where there is no right, there is only what is possible. There is no property there is only possession.

    So we can either return to a world of voluntary exchanges from the extraction of resources from our most productive males, or we can return to the world in which our least productive males use violence to enslave and make use of that which they choose to.

    Civilizations are very fragile things.

    Men are not very smart – certainly not smarter than traditions they do not understand. And women seek to avoid that understanding in order to fulfill their urges, regardless of the cost to men.

    Civilization consists of forcing trades.

    if you abandon those trades, we return to uncivilized behavior: force.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Cult of Sovereignty

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Natural Law of the West

    The Propertarian Institute, Kiev, Ukraine.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 15:34:00 UTC

  • “The current male suicide epidemic is better example of consequences of damage a

    —“The current male suicide epidemic is better example of consequences of damage accumulation on the part of men on behalf of women and children.”— Matej LovriΔ‡


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 15:23:00 UTC

  • What if we just accept that we have domesticated man for profit? Why is that som

    What if we just accept that we have domesticated man for profit? Why is that something we shouldn’t be proud of?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-05 21:25:00 UTC