Curt Doolittle

Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • BETWEEN ONE AND THREE PERCENT OF THE POPULATION. The bottom is more costly than

    BETWEEN ONE AND THREE PERCENT OF THE POPULATION.

    The bottom is more costly than the top is beneficial.

    Those that are unemployable are not unemployable because of intelligence, but because of anti-social-behavior. Much of which is driven by the inability of individuals to tolerate their position in life due to dominance bias.

    This unemployability percentage varies from group to group with the higher the intelligence distribution appearing to produce smaller numbers, and the lower the intelligence distribution appearing to produce much higher numbers.

    However, in whites, we seem to have a higher distribution of neuroticism, (and high rates of depression) and in jews we seem to have disproportionate psychological problems across the spectrum but particularly in schizophrenia, manic depression, and depression. I have no meaningful data on asians or Hispanics (Mestizos) or their underclass the Carribean’s. But as far as I know blacks and jews carry disproportionate levels of mental illness in their genes.

    (There is a bit of data out there on this subject but we are talking about very NOISY stuff here. Mostly because of who uses medical care and who doesn’t varies a great deal. But as far as I’m able to ascertain, schizoprhenia – which is the end result of the depressive spectrum – seems disproportionatly in blacks and jews)

    Now the data says about what you would expect if you control for population sizes and access to health care:

    Amerindians

    Mixed Race.

    Whites

    Blacks

    Hispanics

    Asians

    But this says nothing more than who has insurance, government insurance, and can benefit from using it.

    The only measures I know of that are reliable are cases of hospitalization for schizophrenia, and the genetic markers for it.

    There is enough research at this point to show that across a body of research, conclusions are the same.

    —“Research showed a clear pattern wherein African Americans continued to display a long-term increased rate of Schizophrenia diagnoses, often three to four times as high compared to Euro-Americans. As speculated by previous researchers, Latino Americans were also disproportionately diagnosed at a more than three times higher rate than Euro-Americans with a Schizophrenia diagnosis. In consideration of a psychotic disorder diagnosis more generally, African Americans were more likely to be diagnosed than Euro-Americans. Latino Americans and African Americans both showed an increased lifetime rate of psychotic symptoms in comparison to Euro-Americans and Asians, as reported by clinicians. Even African American and Latino American minor consumers under the age of 18 were twice as likely to be diagnosed with a psychotic disorder as Euro-American youth.”—

    So intelligence distribution is a fairly good proxy except in the case of jews who carry a disproportionate genetic burden which some (jewish) authors have used to explain jewish CULTURAL paranoia mirroring white female MALE paranoia.

    Or, from my rather reductivitist position: by selecting for memory, literacy and verbal acuity jews have bred for and adapted to the female reproductive strategy.

    (Which I like to remind people is not a cognitive one, but an intuitionistic one. All our tribes do what we bred for. Our genders do what we evolved for. )

    ANd that rule of law and market fascism will solve this problem over time.

    BACK TO THE TOPIC

    the point being that our failure to preserve institutional methods of limiting the intergenerational damage of ‘carriers’ has been detrimental to our society. And that all forms of redistributino that we have engaged in, and all forms of immigration that we have engaged in, have done nothing more than impose costs at the bottom that the top – without 500 years of evolutionary technologica advantage over th e world – will eventually reduce our standard of living for all.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-28 10:07:00 UTC

  • “THE SOLUTION IS SIMPLE: BE THE BIGGEST AND BADDEST” —“The female reproductive

    “THE SOLUTION IS SIMPLE: BE THE BIGGEST AND BADDEST”

    —“The female reproductive strategy drives whoever expresses it to seek the strongest patron to sponsor them, while the male reproductive strategy seeks brothers in arms to reciprocally insure each other against other groups of males.

    Females selectively reveal information to engineer the patron’s emotional investment, while males submit to the stronger guy by offering our violence in his service in return for loyalty.

    Asymmetric vs symmetric loyalties.

    So the solution is simple:

    Become the biggest, baddest guys anywhere and punish those who undermine us, and things fall back into place.”— Moritz Berling

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-26 12:48:00 UTC

  • TWO INSIGHTS: ‘THE PROBLEM OF THINKING IN INVERSE”, AND “THE PROBLEM OF THE FEMA

    TWO INSIGHTS: ‘THE PROBLEM OF THINKING IN INVERSE”, AND “THE PROBLEM OF THE FEMALE’S HEN-STRATEGY”

    Today’s two insights, one beautiful, one horrifying.

    1) spirituality is important and the language of spirituality necessary for the purpose of organizing in groups by means of incentives. But we can write laws and argue cases in Propertarianism and we cannot do that in the language of Nietzche, and Junger.

    When people hear me they do not realize that I do not see the problem of our time as rallying ourselves toward common interests, because in my mind we do not know what to rally in favor of, and we do not know how to stop the opposition by formal and institutional means, nor to maintain our defenses against them over time.

    Just as truth is what remains after we eliminate all error bias and deceit, sovereignty and markets are all that remain, once we eliminate violence, theft, fraud, MISINFORMATION AND DECEIT.

    So of course, I speak in NEGATIVES used to PROSECUTE, whereas most men want POSITIVES with used to RALLY.

    So without this understanding, the ‘right’ which is intuitionistic rather than intellectual,

    2) IT’S DECIVILIZING FEMININE STRATEGY IN GENERAL THAT AILS US: The global battle is against democracy and media under free deceitful speech, which has given women both the distribution mechanism and the proxy violence to overthrow their domestication, rather than simply seek legal parity. We desire equals with whom to cooperate, and are largely happy to hold our positions, because we are men. But women are like hens, in that they will perpetually destroy each other and everyone around them in order to achieve dominance by any means possible. Men are not good. But markets including a market for commons allowed them to conduct exchanges and cooperate while maintaining order. Women are not good. They are never good except to their children. We made them good by denying them alternatives, and democracy let them free.

    If you want to be horrified by uncomfortable scientific truths, then that is the one you should be most horrified by.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-26 10:28:00 UTC

  • STOP BLAMING THE TRIBE OF JEWISH MEN FOR WHAT IS A UNIVERSAL FEMALE PROBLEM OR Y

    STOP BLAMING THE TRIBE OF JEWISH MEN FOR WHAT IS A UNIVERSAL FEMALE PROBLEM OR YOU WILL SOLVE THE WRONG PROBLEM.

    —“It’s not the +Cathedral+ it’s the (((Synagogue)))”—-Danny Bogdan Polishchuk

    It’s not really true.

    It’s an alliance between the NE/Anglican Puritans, The Cosmopolitans, and the Feminists.

    We can’t blame it all on (((them))).

    Rothbard tried to blame it all on the Puritans.

    Alt-Righters try to blame it all on the jews .

    But the problem is Women and the Jews have the same reproductive strategy, the same intuitions, and employ the same tactics. The major difference being that women tend not to select eugenically, and jews have nearly industrialized eugenic female evolution in their men at least. Just as we have industrialized over millennia the eugenic evolution of ALL of our classes.

    THE PRINCIPLE INSIGHT: NOT OTHERS, BUT WOMEN.

    Why is it we feel the compulsive need to make a war between groups of men, that is instead, a war between women and men made possible by the transformation of the houses of parliament from one-man-one-family-one-vote, to one individual-one-vote, thereby transferring the compromise between individual men and women in a market for sex, reproduction, care and insurance, into a war of organized violence between the sexes.

    Look at Jews as all women (they pretty much are) and stop looking at them as men. Then look at the data. It’s single women, the underclass, and jews as females, that are the problem.

    Basically, it’s women and the underclass against men and families.

    And we let it happen.

    THE PRIMARY REASON

    So I hope you and others take a hard look at the primary reason that we don’t act: that acting means restoring our domestication of women so that they cannot ally with out-group members against us, thereby taking down our genes, our culture, and our civilization.

    Until you understand the material problem, that democracy gave violence by proxy to women, who are, by nature, against us, then you will try to cure the wrong problem. The problem isn’t jews. The problem is that women’s reproductive strategy, of which all jews are members. They are the ultimate expression of the female unleashed from the civilizing influence of the male.

    Spare the rod, spoil the beast.

    Spare the rod, spoil the child.

    Spare the rod spoil the woman.

    Spare the rod spoil the immigrant.

    Spare the rod spoil the opponent.

    Spare the rod spoil the enemy.

    Children do not know what they do any more than women do.

    Women do not know what they do any more than we do.

    Jews do not know what they do any more than women do.

    SCIENCE:

    We capture and herd women, capture territory, capture resources. Then we divide the spoils. Everything else is just good manners to make it easier and more pleasant.

    I am all for good manners and all. But in the end, evolution isn’t kind to us. The red queen keeps running whether we take a break or not. We either dominate and win, or we let others dominate and win.

    UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTHS

    Science – the pursuit of truth – is not kind to us. The question is whether we out Gun, Germ, Steel, Science, and Govern others or whether they do the same to us.

    The problem we face is not others. It is failing to grasp that the ‘other’ is the female reproductive strategy living among us with unmarried women, undomesticated women, and undomesticated men.

    Women need civilizing more so than men, For the principle reason that violence is far easier to civilize than deception. Women were despised in most of history because of their impulsivity and deceit. WE have tried through education to civilize them in ways we had not civilized them in the past.

    Those who govern can only do so from having domesticated each other through the reciprocal control of marriage.

    Assuming we have any vote at all, then it CAN only come from one marriage one vote.

    Because marriage is the first ‘business’ we enter into.

    Business and industry the second.

    Finance and economy the third

    Commons the fourth

    And rule the fifth.

    Marriage is the first organization that demonstrates your ability to cooperate at high cost for common good. Without this demonstration of your capability, we have no evidence that you should contribute to the commons. We have only your false promise and wishful thinking. And that’s what the evidence of a century has told us: it was false promise and wishful thinking.

    Individuals adhere to rule of law.

    markets demonstrate ability to cooperate with peers.

    Families demonstrate reproductive cooperation between genders.

    Commons demonstrate common investment between families.

    This is why the west invented empiricism.

    BECAUSE WE LIVED IT EVERY DAY.

    “show me, don’t promise me”

    That’s empiricism.

    CLOSING

    Jews are just the expression of the female – the ‘Amazons’ we were searching for have always been among us. But they do not employ violence. They employ rallying, shaming, gossip, mysticism, religion, pseudoscience, and deceit. Which is a much harder form of parasitism to suppress by common law, than violence and theft.

    If we restore rule of law, and we restore truth to the informational commons, then the female strategy of deception, rallying and shaming will again be impossible.

    Testimonial truth, Propertarian ethics, market government: markets in everything.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-26 10:08:00 UTC

  • Weaponization of the feminine reproductive strategy of intuiting, resisting, dis

    Weaponization of the feminine reproductive strategy of intuiting, resisting, displays of rejection, ridiculing, criticizing, gossiping, rallying, and shaming, all of which impose costs (increase frictions) on the status anticipate for organizing to concentrate capital of all kinds, so that we cannot concentrate it, through aggressive eugenic selection. In other words, they manipulate our high trust society by imposing costs on the status signals a heroic civilization uses in order to form high risk and costly organizations.

    Women ‘let through’ only those things they agree with, and they rally and shame against anyting they don’t agree with.

    the problem is that what they agree with is almost always bad for the men.

    This is the Jewish strategy as well, and it was highly influential under the ancient empire, and the modern empire, when a combination of new media in the modern, and discounted and safe transport in the ancient world made preachers and letters possible.

    In modernity we not only enfranchised women and jews but we broke the constraint of debate-between peers by the use of cheap mass communication.

    We created an amplifier for lies, pseudoscience, and mysticism, consumable by the masses, and we did not regulate the use of that amplifier (media) to that which was truthful, material, and scientific.

    Why? Because in our ancient tradition, when only voices, letters, and books (all costly) could be met with equal voice, letter, and book, only the aristocracy could afford to speak, and only aristocracy was afforded such speech, and between the violence on could incurr via duel or assassination, one was reasonably careful about what one said.

    By enfranchising the underclasses, enfranchising women and then jews (all of whom vote as women, and supply argumentative weaponry to women and the underclasses) and giving them discount on communication, without regulating that communication to the true, we let them use technology to create sufficient lies, while we ourselves maintained our ancient aristocratic prohibitions, knowing that we could incur violence.

    WE CREATED THE DOUBLE STANDARD by not continuing to enforce, by violence the previous standard of truthfulness that had been enforced by violence for 5000 years.

    THE SOLUTION IS SIMPLE

    Raise the cost of lying, fraud, and deceit by enforcing the demand for truth and science in political discourse. And we raise the cost through the application of violence.

    The left cannot survive the truth, which is why they invented so many lies.

    We cannot admit the truth (at least we couldn’t before): that we have domesticated the world at the point of a spear, sword, bayonet, bullet, shell, and missile – against it’s interests. And we are continuing to domesticate the world by forcing primitives into the market much against their will.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-26 07:53:00 UTC

  • (speculative uncomfortableness) —“What do you think is the evolutionary reason

    (speculative uncomfortableness)

    —“What do you think is the evolutionary reason for Jews exhibiting relatively poor spatial aptitude when compared to European gentiles? I understand the basis for the selective pressure within Jewish communities for a certain level of verbal and math prowess, I’m just lost why that didn’t carry over to visuospatial ability?”—

    The only theory that makes any sense and corresponds with the data, is that they selected for feminine traits in men: memory for memorizing the doctrine, and verbal acumen for arguing Jewish laws, and interpreting scripture, and dealing with contracts – as well as perception in judging character. This is probably why they have such a high percentage of homosexuals, and even heterosexual often Jews exhibit what we think of as feminine traits: hence the (admittedly exaggerated) principle: “All Jews are female”.

    Imagine that out of every 150 people we got the smartest guy to have as many kids as we could afford, to pay for, as long as he would teach us his knowledge in exchagne, and act as a judge in matters of dispute? How many generations would that take? It takes a lot fewer than you’d think. Humans evolve quickly under intentional selection. In just two hundred years the affect would be dramatic.

    So Jews started out as a Semitic people, meaning with higher alertness (which is interesting) and higher aggression, and then some moved to the west, married western wives, within just a generation or two started inbreeding, and use extremely (good) eugenic reproduction, but selected for what we call feminine traits: memory and excellence at expression.

    Why do jews pursue a female reproductive strategy? (rallying and shaming, running, and … well, not engaging in the most productive of businesses so to speak). Becuase it’s high return.

    So, they evolved themselves to do so. The reason is lost in history, but pastoral sheep herders from arid regions tend to have many competitors and demonstrate (high) particularlism. The group has NEVER been able to hold a decent military, nor hold property for long periods. Nor form a durable, advanced, centralized government.

    We evolved to pursue a relatively balanced relationship between males and females for reasons that I think we understand. Scarce populations in cold climates are more dependent upon one another.

    The asians we do not know the reason for their skill set, other than they have dramatically lowered their testosterone and sexual maturity and obtained longer lives for doing so.

    Muslims chose a more masculine one. Exaggeratedly so, and did so LATE in history, so like any technology they have the most recent.

    (each group’s history is pretty interesting in this regard).

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-25 15:07:00 UTC

  • Property, Family, Clan, Tribe, and Nation are unnatural to women. They are the m

    Property, Family, Clan, Tribe, and Nation are unnatural to women.

    They are the means by which we domesticated them.

    And they rebel against them whenever given the opportunity.

    We evolved to kill competitors to capture, herd, and domesticate women so that we could control our reproduction.

    Women are universalist for the simple reason that they are always captors, and so they seek the most secure captor.

    Why does this matter? Because we are exceptionally good at domesticating males – they’re much more dangerous in the short term. But we forget that while we developed many institutions to domesticate males, we created just as many to domesticate women.

    It is also true that the purpose of monogamy was to domesticate undesirable males.

    This asymmetry between women and men and marriage is the institutional problem we have not yet solved.

    Many more men are undesirable than women are undesirable.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-25 14:37:00 UTC

  • NOT BEATING THE DOG, WOMAN, PROLE, INVADER I don’t beat a dog for licking its as

    NOT BEATING THE DOG, WOMAN, PROLE, INVADER

    I don’t beat a dog for licking its ass. It’s a dog. I train it to stop doing it in my presence.

    I don’t beat a woman for short sighted solipsistic moralism. She’s a woman. I ask her to stop doing it in my presence.

    I don’t beat a prole for his impulsivity. It’s a prole. I demand by threat of force, that he stop doing it in my neighborhood.

    I don’t beat a minority here for pursuing its interests. It’s a minority with competing interests. I demand by force of exit, imprisonment, or death it to stop doing it in my territory.

    I don’t beat my fellow warriors for letting dogs, women, proles, and minorities act uncivilized it in our nation. They’re fellow warriors. Instead, I criticise them for their laziness in suffering the licking of asses, the solipsism of women, the impulsivity of proles, and the conquest by minorities of our nation.

    Rule at high cost, and profit from it. Or be ruled at your cost, and suffer from it.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-25 10:13:00 UTC

  • COUNTERING THE TROLLS (humor) (you counter a Troll and a Not-An-Argument, and a

    COUNTERING THE TROLLS (humor)

    (you counter a Troll and a Not-An-Argument, and a Rally-and-shamer using the same strategy:

    1-find a group where someone signals heavily that you can make an example of in front of others.

    2 – state your central point. and then subtly insult to force the signaler to defend his signaling.

    3 – state your central point – and then incrementally race to the bottom faster than the opponent, depriving him of the opportunity to do the same.

    4 – keep repeating your central point – and displaying your dominance in the argument, and his inability to answer the central point, followed by another insult to maintain his defense of his signals.

    5 – this technique does not require much more than staying on message with the central point, and reiterating the usual juvenile responses.

    6 – Close by thanking the poor idiot for providing you with a forum for distributing the central point and demonstrating his inability to defend it. And then copy and paste the argument for others to share, while adding his name as a mention. Then cross post your article back to the original thread.

    Trevor Hebro —Jesus wept Curt, you sound like the special needs geriatric that try’s to talk to stranger on the bus—-

    I sound like a guy who gets laid. You sound like a guy who doesn’t. Hence the difference in our evaluations of reality, means of acting in it, and speech in communicating about it. 😉

    Actually, like any loving parent, I find children – even the children of others – cute when they rebel. I understand it is the unsatisfied mind fights its own non-correspondence with reality.

    Adults make arguments. Children whine, complain, criticize and ridicule what they don’t understand. It’s a way of preserving their confidence. Confidence that is necessary to face a world that is accommodating of their interests.

    I don’t see the love of children of any age as condescension but as appreciation for their struggle to mature into an adult who has control over his satisfaction. And as a good paternalist I see the rebellion of the unsatisfied as the courage to not surrender to fate, and to keep up the good fight, in the hope that someday they may find a way to achieve satisfaction with a world that does not value them.

    Ridicule is the last resort of the weak.;)

    Max Macro: —By getting laid Curt means paying for underaged Ukrainian whores with Bitcoin to listen to his demented ramblings about nothing —

    Max. I don’t do underage. But then, unlike you, I don’t do my cousins either. 😉 Lolz

    —Hey Curt still waiting for you to “beat the shit” out of me you fat pointless sack of bloviating autism—

    What? Your ass still hurt from the last ground-glass dildo I used to intellectually humiliate you? (Not that I remember.)

    —Yikes, you’re into some weird shit. Get help, homo—-

    It’s like you keep begging me “master, master, please, I beg you, harder and deeper”.

    I suppose next time Ill use the ball gag. lol

    —“And this , ladies and gentlemen, is what having pie charts for friends does to a man.”—

    This is what having life experience, extraordinary character and will, knowledge of many domains, and humiliating intelligence does to a man.

    You see, I can trash talk, speak in colloquial language, conduct civil commercial discourse, gesture in effete polysyllables, and argue in analytic verse. The fact that you can’t climb the ladder along with me is a demonstration of nothing more than your inferiority. 😉

    Oh. And you can stop flirting with me. I don’t want your ‘friendship’. That would … be uncouth, so to speak. 😉

    —Nothing more pathetic than desperately trying to validate your self declared superiority to random strangers on the Internet who just like to see you break down into a puddle of your own autism—

    —[pretentious reference to obscure thing is a big impact on my life, somehow]—

    Lol. You are like the straight man for a comedy team. You just give me opportunity to insult you, so that I can share the conversation with my friends and get a laugh.

    I love the peasantry. I can always count on an involuntary jester to blossom from the underclass. 🙂 lol

    —if Curt was as awesome as he claims, it’d speak for itself and he wouldn’t have to desperately assure himself every time someone makes fun of him—-

    Hey munchkin. I have evidence of repeated success in every walk of life despite a horrific childhood, aspieness, and a series of debilitating illnesses. I don’t claim I’m awesome. I claim you’re a shitbag loser grasping at straws of attention by throwing spitballs of ignorance at your betters. Which means – nearly everyone. 😉

    Some People watch sitcoms. Some tell jokes. Some trash talk. I bunny-stomp on munchkins who troll me for fun and profit. It’s sheer joy. Now back to work. There is no rest for the wicked. 😉

    –Curt

    (Yeah, I let hot women take advantage of me. It’s true. I cop to it. And I don’t regret a penny of it. Other than maybe the Louboutin shoes. That was over the top. But I’ll tell you. You get laid GOOD for Gucci and Burberry bags. note that Apple laptops dont seem to do the same. And, yeah, I let employees take advantage of me. But the way I look at it, is that if I’ve got it, i’ll share, if I don’t I can’t. Making the money is fun anyway. )

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-25 09:12:00 UTC

  • The bias for SELECTING an ideology that advances one’s reproductive strategy IS

    The bias for SELECTING an ideology that advances one’s reproductive strategy IS genetic. And, that’s what we do.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-24 16:18:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790588322871668737

    Reply addressees: @SemperLiberum @RotCleanse

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790586505668337664

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790586505668337664