Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science
-
Yes, social media increases suicide rates among teens. Of course it does. I thou
Yes, social media increases suicide rates among teens. Of course it does. I thought it was obvious. The question is whether or not it’s a bad thing to remove them from the pool. I think it’s a bad thing, since hormones are basically undesirable drugs being thrown into your brain for reasons of evolutionary and reproductive necessity. -
WHY DO WOMEN HIT ME? (humor with wisdom) lolz… why do all the women in my life
WHY DO WOMEN HIT ME?
(humor with wisdom)
lolz… why do all the women in my life always threaten me with bodily harm? I have to teach every woman around me not to hit me. Really.
(Answer from a woman: “It’s retaliation. You tease too much, and you have no boundaries, and you aren’t even aware of anyone else’s boundaries. So we retaliate by the only means possible: a whack in the head, or the promise of something worse.”)
(Ok. That’s true. lol My understanding of my subconscious is that Women need sovereignty in a nest because they don’t have it elsewhere. But women need boundaries outside the next. And they need boundaries regarding me, money, business, politics, and war. So I set them. With a bit of humor. But the ‘law’ is clear: none of that nonsense outside the nest. 😉 )
God I love women. Really. I mean. Seriously. I just don’t want to compete with them outside the nest, because I don’t want to win, because I can win, but I dont like the consequences of winning.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-12 12:31:00 UTC
-
Why Do Women Hit Me?
(humor with wisdom) lolz… why do all the women in my life always threaten me with bodily harm? I have to teach every woman around me not to hit me. Really. (Answer from a woman: “It’s retaliation. You tease too much, and you have no boundaries, and you aren’t even aware of anyone else’s boundaries. So we retaliate by the only means possible: a whack in the head, or the promise of something worse.”) (Ok. That’s true. lol My understanding of my subconscious is that Women need sovereignty in a nest because they don’t have it elsewhere. But women need boundaries outside the next. And they need boundaries regarding me, money, business, politics, and war. So I set them. With a bit of humor. But the ‘law’ is clear: none of that nonsense outside the nest. 😉 ) God I love women. Really. I mean. Seriously. I just don’t want to compete with them outside the nest, because I don’t want to win, because I can win, but I dont like the consequences of winning. -
Why Do Women Hit Me?
(humor with wisdom) lolz… why do all the women in my life always threaten me with bodily harm? I have to teach every woman around me not to hit me. Really. (Answer from a woman: “It’s retaliation. You tease too much, and you have no boundaries, and you aren’t even aware of anyone else’s boundaries. So we retaliate by the only means possible: a whack in the head, or the promise of something worse.”) (Ok. That’s true. lol My understanding of my subconscious is that Women need sovereignty in a nest because they don’t have it elsewhere. But women need boundaries outside the next. And they need boundaries regarding me, money, business, politics, and war. So I set them. With a bit of humor. But the ‘law’ is clear: none of that nonsense outside the nest. 😉 ) God I love women. Really. I mean. Seriously. I just don’t want to compete with them outside the nest, because I don’t want to win, because I can win, but I dont like the consequences of winning. -
(stupid stuff)(gun nerd warning. re: games and movies) Ok, so yes, dual wielding
(stupid stuff)(gun nerd warning. re: games and movies)
Ok, so yes, dual wielding is stupid if you are trying to aim and fire with two weapons. You will simply be faster and FAR more accurate with one that cycles quickly (esp steel 1911 in 9mm or 38sp). 9MM has a long flat trajectory. Even the old guys who carried two guns was simply so that they didn’t have to deal with slow reloading. Although there are and were trick shot guys who shoot one at a time, it is in fact faster to shoot one pistol at a time.
But if you use one as a shield/reloading and the other offensively, that’s different altogether.
If you train to not use sights but point shoot or hip shoot that’s even better. It takes more work. But I mean, if we are talking advanced skills then … that’s what more work means.
Are you better off with two men with SMG’s? Yes. But they are far harder to hide, and from the evidence, it’s far harder to train idiots to use without killing you by accident.
BTW: the Barretta 92 is a sh-t gun. It’s just durable enough to survive generations of 19 year old morons. There are only three guns I care about 1911, Browning, CZ75, and below that I’m just gonna stick with my Walther for “Date Nights”.
The HK417A2 combines the skeletal features of the M4 with the (thank god) G36(AR18) piston system and 7.62/.308 ammunition – and with full size barrel will reach out to the long distances we have seen in mountain/desert/steppe regions compared to the jungles of the M16 era. The G2 removes select fire (leaving it only semi-auto), and adds steel (upper receiver) instead of aluminum.
My undrestanding is that the military (finally) is seeking an even better munition between 6.5 and 7mm, as well as .300 whisper for suppressor fire.
So the debate over the ‘light’ .556 ammunition is finally over. We are continuing to engage at longer ranges.
I assume that westerners will increasingly seek to ‘own the night’.
My suspicion is that we will develop disposable (explosive) close quarters robots and gear carriers as soon as battery manufacturing reaches the next energy density multiple.
Until the robot itself is the explosive weapon then I think we are not cost effective. Electronics prices are there. The energy prices are not.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-08 13:11:00 UTC
-
Women are disloyal which is why they have only a few close friends, but many acq
Women are disloyal which is why they have only a few close friends, but many acquaintances. Men form loyalty networks instead, of less deep but more flexible relations. Aside from differences in bias between experiential and algorithmic, this difference in loyalty vs harmony causes the various differences in occupational achievement. As risk increases so does the risk of defection, and men do not defect under disharmony where women will defect at the first sign of it. -
Women are disloyal which is why they have only a few close friends, but many acq
Women are disloyal which is why they have only a few close friends, but many acquaintances. Men form loyalty networks instead, of less deep but more flexible relations. Aside from differences in bias between experiential and algorithmic, this difference in loyalty vs harmony causes the various differences in occupational achievement. As risk increases so does the risk of defection, and men do not defect under disharmony where women will defect at the first sign of it. -
Women are disloyal which is why they have only a few close friends, but many acq
Women are disloyal which is why they have only a few close friends, but many acquaintances. Men form loyalty networks instead, of less deep but more flexible relations.
Aside from differences in bias between experiential and algorithmic, this difference in loyalty vs harmony causes the various differences in occupational achievement.
As risk increases so does the risk of defection, and men do not defect under disharmony where women will defect at the first sign of it.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-08 10:39:00 UTC
-
The Current State Of Knowledge
Jeff Hawkins: On Intelligence (The Brain) Daniel Kahneman: Thinking, Fast and Slow (The Mind) Jonathan Haidt: The Righteous Mind (The Moral Intuition) Garett Jones: Hive Mind: How Your Nation�s IQ Matters So Much More Than Your Own William Tucker: Marriage and Civilization Francis Fukuyama: Trust (The Political Objective) Francis Fukuyama: Political order and political decay. (Comparative political orders) Emmanuel Todd: Invention of Europe (see Craig Willy’s Summary here: http://www.craigwilly.info/…/emmanuel-todds-linvention…/ ) I don’t know anyone who is better at right wing (scientific) political theory than I am. And it’s reducible to the false conflict between international jewish neoconservatism > jewish capitalism > jewish libertarianism > and french/jewish communism AND anglo nationalism under Rule Of Law by Reciprocity (mobile, scandinavian and english) in an adaptive hierarchy, and germanic nationalism under Roman Law of State and People under a formal hierarchy. In other words, the anglo scandinavian (pirate/viking) model vs the german (agrarian) model. -
The Current State Of Knowledge
Jeff Hawkins: On Intelligence (The Brain) Daniel Kahneman: Thinking, Fast and Slow (The Mind) Jonathan Haidt: The Righteous Mind (The Moral Intuition) Garett Jones: Hive Mind: How Your Nation�s IQ Matters So Much More Than Your Own William Tucker: Marriage and Civilization Francis Fukuyama: Trust (The Political Objective) Francis Fukuyama: Political order and political decay. (Comparative political orders) Emmanuel Todd: Invention of Europe (see Craig Willy’s Summary here: http://www.craigwilly.info/…/emmanuel-todds-linvention…/ ) I don’t know anyone who is better at right wing (scientific) political theory than I am. And it’s reducible to the false conflict between international jewish neoconservatism > jewish capitalism > jewish libertarianism > and french/jewish communism AND anglo nationalism under Rule Of Law by Reciprocity (mobile, scandinavian and english) in an adaptive hierarchy, and germanic nationalism under Roman Law of State and People under a formal hierarchy. In other words, the anglo scandinavian (pirate/viking) model vs the german (agrarian) model.