Curt Doolittle

Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • CURRENT STATE OF KNOWLEDGE Jeff Hawkins: On Intelligence (The Brain) Daniel Kahn

    http://www.craigwilly.info/…/emmanuel-todds-linvention…/THE CURRENT STATE OF KNOWLEDGE

    Jeff Hawkins: On Intelligence (The Brain)

    Daniel Kahneman: Thinking, Fast and Slow (The Mind)

    Jonathan Haidt: The Righteous Mind (The Moral Intuition)

    Garett Jones: Hive Mind: How Your Nation�s IQ Matters So Much More Than Your Own

    William Tucker: Marriage and Civilization

    Francis Fukuyama: Trust (The Political Objective)

    Francis Fukuyama: Political order and political decay. (Comparative political orders)

    Emmanuel Todd: Invention of Europe (see Craig Willy’s Summary here:

    http://www.craigwilly.info/…/emmanuel-todds-linvention…/ )

    I don’t know anyone who is better at right wing (scientific) political theory than I am. And it’s reducible to the false conflict between international jewish neoconservatism > jewish capitalism > jewish libertarianism > and french/jewish communism AND anglo nationalism under Rule Of Law by Reciprocity (mobile, scandinavian and english) in an adaptive hierarchy, and germanic nationalism under Roman Law of State and People under a formal hierarchy.

    In other words, the anglo scandinavian (pirate/viking) model vs the german (agrarian) model.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-08 08:51:00 UTC

  • I mean. Humans are GREAT at logic. We are not so good at discovering disruptive

    I mean. Humans are GREAT at logic. We are not so good at discovering disruptive external correspondence instead of confirming internal consistency. We are really REALLY bad at surviving logical overloading. I mean… math is interesting simply because it is so simple, that from that trivial simplicity we can construct deterministic consequences, beyond our ability to imagine.

  • I mean. Humans are GREAT at logic. We are not so good at discovering disruptive

    I mean. Humans are GREAT at logic. We are not so good at discovering disruptive external correspondence instead of confirming internal consistency. We are really REALLY bad at surviving logical overloading. I mean… math is interesting simply because it is so simple, that from that trivial simplicity we can construct deterministic consequences, beyond our ability to imagine.

  • I mean. Humans are GREAT at logic. We are not so good at discovering disruptive

    I mean. Humans are GREAT at logic. We are not so good at discovering disruptive external correspondence instead of confirming internal consistency. We are really REALLY bad at surviving logical overloading. I mean… math is interesting simply because it is so simple, that from that trivial simplicity we can construct deterministic consequences, beyond our ability to imagine.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-07 11:48:00 UTC

  • by Eli Harman “I will offer that it is not “white knighting” to simply call out

    by Eli Harman “I will offer that it is not “white knighting” to simply call out bad ideas; just as it is not “white knighting” to interfere in an act of domestic abuse. When one individual seeks to dominate another individual, regardless of the specific characteristics of these individuals, it is incumbent upon those who actually believe in liberty to speak out. Believe it or not some people are more concerned with what is right and good than with what others think of them.” ———- Most people demonstrably prefer dominance hierarchies, even dominance hierarchies they aren’t at the top of. You would have to coerce them, violating your own principles, in order to override that preference. You’re unlikely to persuade them. A stable dominance hierarchy passes along enough benefits, even to those near the bottom, to secure their willing support. What do you offer people? Freedom and responsibility most of them can’t handle, don’t want, and wouldn’t know what to do with? Good luck selling that. What is right: imaginary. What is good: subjective. What others think of you: not the be all end all, but of more consequence than your autistic brain weights it. Of course, some people just like to kick sh_t over or burn it down. And there is no problem with suppressing such troublemakers, if what they are trying to upset is of value to most. Then it just becomes a question of who will prevail. Every so often, the status quo really is rotten and corrupt, and won’t survive that clash. Now is probably one of those times. But you don’t have the medicine we need.

  • by Eli Harman “I will offer that it is not “white knighting” to simply call out

    by Eli Harman

    “I will offer that it is not “white knighting” to simply call out bad ideas; just as it is not “white knighting” to interfere in an act of domestic abuse. When one individual seeks to dominate another individual, regardless of the specific characteristics of these individuals, it is incumbent upon those who actually believe in liberty to speak out. Believe it or not some people are more concerned with what is right and good than with what others think of them.”

    ———-

    Most people demonstrably prefer dominance hierarchies, even dominance hierarchies they aren’t at the top of. You would have to coerce them, violating your own principles, in order to override that preference. You’re unlikely to persuade them.

    A stable dominance hierarchy passes along enough benefits, even to those near the bottom, to secure their willing support.

    What do you offer people? Freedom and responsibility most of them can’t handle, don’t want, and wouldn’t know what to do with? Good luck selling that.

    What is right: imaginary.

    What is good: subjective.

    What others think of you: not the be all end all, but of more consequence than your autistic brain weights it.

    Of course, some people just like to kick sh_t over or burn it down. And there is no problem with suppressing such troublemakers, if what they are trying to upset is of value to most. Then it just becomes a question of who will prevail.

    Every so often, the status quo really is rotten and corrupt, and won’t survive that clash. Now is probably one of those times. But you don’t have the medicine we need.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-07 10:20:00 UTC

  • by Eli Harman “I will offer that it is not “white knighting” to simply call out

    by Eli Harman “I will offer that it is not “white knighting” to simply call out bad ideas; just as it is not “white knighting” to interfere in an act of domestic abuse. When one individual seeks to dominate another individual, regardless of the specific characteristics of these individuals, it is incumbent upon those who actually believe in liberty to speak out. Believe it or not some people are more concerned with what is right and good than with what others think of them.” ———- Most people demonstrably prefer dominance hierarchies, even dominance hierarchies they aren’t at the top of. You would have to coerce them, violating your own principles, in order to override that preference. You’re unlikely to persuade them. A stable dominance hierarchy passes along enough benefits, even to those near the bottom, to secure their willing support. What do you offer people? Freedom and responsibility most of them can’t handle, don’t want, and wouldn’t know what to do with? Good luck selling that. What is right: imaginary. What is good: subjective. What others think of you: not the be all end all, but of more consequence than your autistic brain weights it. Of course, some people just like to kick sh_t over or burn it down. And there is no problem with suppressing such troublemakers, if what they are trying to upset is of value to most. Then it just becomes a question of who will prevail. Every so often, the status quo really is rotten and corrupt, and won’t survive that clash. Now is probably one of those times. But you don’t have the medicine we need.

  • “Curt, I’m a female with autism, what does that make me?”— A Friend It makes y

    —“Curt, I’m a female with autism, what does that make me?”— A Friend It makes you a female with autism. Just as it makes a male with psychosis just a male with psychosis. When I say (or Baron Cohen says), Female Psychotic or Solipsistic vs Male Aspergers or Autistic, we are only saying that the distribution of brain structures from the conflationary fast growth, to the deflationary slow growth, tend to be distributed in what we consider ‘normal’ individuals, by gender. We associate these brain structures with the dominant distribution of those brain structures. For example, homosexuality, at least in males is most likely an in utero developmental defect. For women, they are always more ‘fungible’ with regard to sexuality. But ‘butch’ lesbians are fairly identifiable as having more masculine personalities. Two say that there are only two genders is true. To say that there are wide distributions of gender traits is something else. To say that gender norms are determined by both genetic, in utero, developmental, habituation (circumstantial demand, or training), or mental illness (developmental failure) is simply obvious. I love being an aspie with other aspies. I love being a normie with normies. I prefer to be with both. The primary problem for aspies is finding each other so that we can develop relationshipos. And then finding women we can mate with and reproduce. Thankfully we have internet and internet dating.

  • “Curt, I’m a female with autism, what does that make me?”— A Friend It makes y

    —“Curt, I’m a female with autism, what does that make me?”— A Friend

    It makes you a female with autism. Just as it makes a male with psychosis just a male with psychosis.

    When I say (or Baron Cohen says), Female Psychotic or Solipsistic vs Male Aspergers or Autistic, we are only saying that the distribution of brain structures from the conflationary fast growth, to the deflationary slow growth, tend to be distributed in what we consider ‘normal’ individuals, by gender. We associate these brain structures with the dominant distribution of those brain structures.

    For example, homosexuality, at least in males is most likely an in utero developmental defect. For women, they are always more ‘fungible’ with regard to sexuality. But ‘butch’ lesbians are fairly identifiable as having more masculine personalities.

    Two say that there are only two genders is true. To say that there are wide distributions of gender traits is something else. To say that gender norms are determined by both genetic, in utero, developmental, habituation (circumstantial demand, or training), or mental illness (developmental failure) is simply obvious.

    I love being an aspie with other aspies. I love being a normie with normies. I prefer to be with both. The primary problem for aspies is finding each other so that we can develop relationshipos. And then finding women we can mate with and reproduce.

    Thankfully we have internet and internet dating.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-07 10:14:00 UTC

  • “Curt, I’m a female with autism, what does that make me?”— A Friend It makes y

    —“Curt, I’m a female with autism, what does that make me?”— A Friend It makes you a female with autism. Just as it makes a male with psychosis just a male with psychosis. When I say (or Baron Cohen says), Female Psychotic or Solipsistic vs Male Aspergers or Autistic, we are only saying that the distribution of brain structures from the conflationary fast growth, to the deflationary slow growth, tend to be distributed in what we consider ‘normal’ individuals, by gender. We associate these brain structures with the dominant distribution of those brain structures. For example, homosexuality, at least in males is most likely an in utero developmental defect. For women, they are always more ‘fungible’ with regard to sexuality. But ‘butch’ lesbians are fairly identifiable as having more masculine personalities. Two say that there are only two genders is true. To say that there are wide distributions of gender traits is something else. To say that gender norms are determined by both genetic, in utero, developmental, habituation (circumstantial demand, or training), or mental illness (developmental failure) is simply obvious. I love being an aspie with other aspies. I love being a normie with normies. I prefer to be with both. The primary problem for aspies is finding each other so that we can develop relationshipos. And then finding women we can mate with and reproduce. Thankfully we have internet and internet dating.