Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science
-
Curt Doolittle’s answer: Every person who does evil, does not do so because he t
Curt Doolittle’s answer: Every person who does evil, does not do so because he thinks he is evil, but because his actions are warranted – either via punishment, retribution, restitution, profit, or some version of ‘getting his or her fair share’ (which is the justification we make for most of ou… -
I’m not sure that’s right Dr Peterson, in the sense that women are not bound by
I’m not sure that’s right Dr Peterson, in the sense that women are not bound by the reciprocal threat between males as they were prior to 1900. Duel, Libel, Slander, and Scold were effective for both genders.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 17:58:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975068761236664320
Reply addressees: @jordanbpeterson
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975059531473477632
IN REPLY TO:
@jordanbpeterson
High trait agreeableness neuroticism, I would guess. But of course such differences don’t really exist. https://t.co/jhsXYF5kt6
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975059531473477632
-
Absolutely positively. We just differ in what we’re picky about. And we also sor
Absolutely positively. We just differ in what we’re picky about. And we also sort by class, so that means we are picky at every level of the genetic hierarchy. The problem for most men is that they are worse estimators of their market value than women.(Evolution needed us to be)
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 15:30:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975031668422692865
Reply addressees: @DegenRolf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974175719180906496
IN REPLY TO:
@DegenRolf
Men who consider themselves more attractive are as finicky about a potential mate as are attractive women. https://t.co/BDHXFKbZ1f https://t.co/xoWeLByPVq
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974175719180906496
-
but then it is status that drives affinity for leftism: the frustration with low
but then it is status that drives affinity for leftism: the frustration with low social, sexual, economic, and political market value under market meritocracy.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 08:01:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974918665190674432
Reply addressees: @npdrifter @TorontoStar
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974860888317374464
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974860888317374464
-
but then it is status that drives affinity for leftism: the frustration with low
but then it is status that drives affinity for leftism: the frustration with low social, sexual, economic, and political market value under market meritocracy.
the reason marx was wrong was that the principal beneficiaries of consumer capitalism were consumers (labor). capitalism has been the great leveller of consumption. the only difference between the classes is the purchase of signal goods (really).
Marx stopped writing after reading menger and realizing he was wrong. but he kept up pretenses of working to maintain financial support by Engels – marx was a perfect marxist: a parasite.
It has always and always will be and it was menger, pareto, durkheim, and hayek that explained why – and why it cannot be otherwise: knowledge, incentives, and the use of incentives to organize experimentation, production, distribution, and trade. value is created by organizing
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 04:02:00 UTC
-
but then it is status that drives affinity for leftism: the frustration with low
but then it is status that drives affinity for leftism: the frustration with low social, sexual, economic, and political market value under market meritocracy. the reason marx was wrong was that the principal beneficiaries of consumer capitalism were consumers (labor). capitalism has been the great leveller of consumption. the only difference between the classes is the purchase of signal goods (really). Marx stopped writing after reading menger and realizing he was wrong. but he kept up pretenses of working to maintain financial support by Engels – marx was a perfect marxist: a parasite. It has always and always will be and it was menger, pareto, durkheim, and hayek that explained why – and why it cannot be otherwise: knowledge, incentives, and the use of incentives to organize experimentation, production, distribution, and trade. value is created by organizing -
but then it is status that drives affinity for leftism: the frustration with low
but then it is status that drives affinity for leftism: the frustration with low social, sexual, economic, and political market value under market meritocracy. the reason marx was wrong was that the principal beneficiaries of consumer capitalism were consumers (labor). capitalism has been the great leveller of consumption. the only difference between the classes is the purchase of signal goods (really). Marx stopped writing after reading menger and realizing he was wrong. but he kept up pretenses of working to maintain financial support by Engels – marx was a perfect marxist: a parasite. It has always and always will be and it was menger, pareto, durkheim, and hayek that explained why – and why it cannot be otherwise: knowledge, incentives, and the use of incentives to organize experimentation, production, distribution, and trade. value is created by organizing -
If An Iq Test Was Embedded Within A Popular And Highly-addictive Video Game, Would The Players Develop The Ability To Score Extremely Well On Iq Tests?
No. All tests are renormalized regularly to compensate for adaptive effects and therefore to preserve the distribution. It is a very precise science.
https://www.quora.com/If-an-IQ-test-was-embedded-within-a-popular-and-highly-addictive-video-game-would-the-players-develop-the-ability-to-score-extremely-well-on-IQ-tests
-
If An Iq Test Was Embedded Within A Popular And Highly-addictive Video Game, Would The Players Develop The Ability To Score Extremely Well On Iq Tests?
No. All tests are renormalized regularly to compensate for adaptive effects and therefore to preserve the distribution. It is a very precise science.
https://www.quora.com/If-an-IQ-test-was-embedded-within-a-popular-and-highly-addictive-video-game-would-the-players-develop-the-ability-to-score-extremely-well-on-IQ-tests
-
You don’t understand Peterson? Let me help you:Peterson is redeveloping Stoicism
You don’t understand Peterson? Let me help you:Peterson is redeveloping Stoicism in rational prose, and uniting it with narrative and archetypes because those archetypes are biologically determined. He’s recreating the Lost Philosophy-Religion of our Ancestors. #JordanPeterson
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 23:33:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974790828806852613