In the literature we call this ‘Altruistic Punishment;. Or, in operational (scientific) language: “We intuitively bear the high costs of preserving the incentive to cooperate in the group, in order to suppress free riding, cheating, parasitism, and predation.”
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 21:47:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974764202257780736
In the literature we call this ‘Altruistic Punishment;. Or, in operational (scientific) language: “We intuitively bear the high costs of preserving the incentive to cooperate in the group, in order to suppress free riding, cheating, parasitism, and predation.” #JordaPeterson
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 21:47:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974764108854759426
Reply addressees: @InvisibleNGO
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974233687125610502
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable ā we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974233687125610502
A man who has mental, emotional, and physical agency, is not upset by the gossip, rallying and shaming of children and adolescents, any more than he is upset by the misbehavior of cattle, sheep, or pets. Animals of all kinds need domesticating – Agency by Ability, or by Training.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 21:41:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974762593763110912
A man who has mental, emotional, and physical agency, is not upset by the gossip, rallying and shaming of children and adolescents, any more than he is upset by the misbehavior of cattle, sheep, or pets. Animals of all kinds need domesticating – Agency by Ability, or by Training.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 21:41:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974762523923832833
Reply addressees: @Jory_Nal
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/970689939238260737
IN REPLY TO:
@Jory_Nal
This thesis makes #Nazis upset.
Clearly worth reading then.
For the idiot #JordanBPeterson Iād note that #narcissism is to REFUSE to preface your view with its biases, FAILING to see conflations in view as privelege, and pretending to objectivity as one spouts idiosyncracy. https://t.co/OeXFC7jRmU
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/970689939238260737
I thought only little girls used name calling, disapproval, shaming, ridicule, and gossip as a substitute for argument. Men make arguments, and warrant their veracity at the risk of violence. If you decide to wear pants, and make an argument, I’m happy to defeat you. š
Unfortunately, we must now perform our ‘mansplaining’ for overweight, low testosterone, fatherless, uncompetitive, unproductive, video-game playing, comic-reading, underdeveloped males as well as our wives and daughters. š it’s a dirty job but men have to do it. š
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 20:50:00 UTC
People SPEAK (‘report’) by their moral biases – which differ widely, but they ACT (‘demonstrate’) rational self interest – which doesn’t differ whatsoever.That is why juries are exceptional at determining when you’re lying. ie: Any argument without warranty or deposit is a fraud.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 19:44:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974733159563710465
The problem is you can’t take a woman seriously if she (a) does not reason seriously (b) does not respect the boundary of violence.
In the past, we could use violence agianst women who broke that boundary – just as we could use it against men.
Our big mistake was ending slander, libel, scolding, and the duel.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 12:49:00 UTC