(I have had the same experience, but the difference is, that as a male, we are often happy to compete rather than conform. So as she describes herself as a bleeding heart liberal – in other words has the intuitions of a female – I ended up the opposite specializing in competition and natural law – with the intuitions of a male. As far as I know the autism spectrum increases the distance between our intuitions and our reason for what appear to be extremely trivial reasons in the early neural economy – but that has had zero impact on how we decide those questions that are solved only by intuition: by rather than reason. Women think like women do, and men think like men do, because our competing gender reproductive strategies evolved prior to our use of reason, and almost certainly before our development of consciousness. There is a difference between the male and female brain structure due to the development of that distance, but there is also a difference between the male and female structure due to endocrine influences. But we can still observe that we see both genders with both reproductive, social and cognitive biases each varying along the male and female axis of development.)
Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science
-
(I have had the same experience, but the difference is, that as a male, we are o
(I have had the same experience, but the difference is, that as a male, we are often happy to compete rather than conform. So as she describes herself as a bleeding heart liberal – in other words has the intuitions of a female – I ended up the opposite specializing in competition and natural law – with the intuitions of a male. As far as I know the autism spectrum increases the distance between our intuitions and our reason for what appear to be extremely trivial reasons in the early neural economy – but that has had zero impact on how we decide those questions that are solved only by intuition: by rather than reason. Women think like women do, and men think like men do, because our competing gender reproductive strategies evolved prior to our use of reason, and almost certainly before our development of consciousness. There is a difference between the male and female brain structure due to the development of that distance, but there is also a difference between the male and female structure due to endocrine influences. But we can still observe that we see both genders with both reproductive, social and cognitive biases each varying along the male and female axis of development.)
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-18 14:18:00 UTC
-
(I have had the same experience, but the difference is, that as a male, we are o
(I have had the same experience, but the difference is, that as a male, we are often happy to compete rather than conform. So as she describes herself as a bleeding heart liberal – in other words has the intuitions of a female – I ended up the opposite specializing in competition and natural law – with the intuitions of a male. As far as I know the autism spectrum increases the distance between our intuitions and our reason for what appear to be extremely trivial reasons in the early neural economy – but that has had zero impact on how we decide those questions that are solved only by intuition: by rather than reason. Women think like women do, and men think like men do, because our competing gender reproductive strategies evolved prior to our use of reason, and almost certainly before our development of consciousness. There is a difference between the male and female brain structure due to the development of that distance, but there is also a difference between the male and female structure due to endocrine influences. But we can still observe that we see both genders with both reproductive, social and cognitive biases each varying along the male and female axis of development.) -
1) Understanding is overrated, because (a) few people understand,(b) the rest ei
1) Understanding is overrated, because (a) few people understand,(b) the rest either ignore it,(c) justify it,or (d) aggressively oppose it and pursue their bet interests anyway.Hence communication and understanding fails and authoring and enforcing law succeeds. @jordanpeterson
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-18 13:40:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975366400767295488
-
An Example Of Testimonial Prose
–“the left and right both argue for inclusion but along different lines.”– A Friend Dysgenic expansion on the left (female), vs eugenic expansion on the right (male) Female and male strategies compete. Or perhaps ‘adapt’ is a better way of looking at it. So ‘along different lines’ obscure that those lines are not ‘relative’ but produce vastly different externalities. This is an example why I use operational langauge and full accounting – I don’t leave obscurant statements un accounted for. Testimonialism: 1 – Operational Language (Operations are measurements) 2 – Deflated vocabular tested by series. 3 – Complete Sentences describing complete transactions. 4 – Testing Rational Choice, and Reciprocity 5 – Accounting for the seen (internal) and unseen (external). By simple use of operational grammar (the rules I just stated) we test categorical, logical, empirical, existential, rational, reciprocal, fully accounted prose just a surely as we test any statement in other logics and mathematics. In other words, just as all other forms of calculation falsify but do not justify, operational grammar falsified but does not justify. The only difference is that operational grammar is complete in that it includes all actionable dimensions of reality, not some subset or general rule of reality. If one cannot make such a statement in operational language he knows not of what he speaks. He just uses convention and habit like any other storyteller. -
AN EXAMPLE OF TESTIMONIAL PROSE –“the left and right both argue for inclusion b
AN EXAMPLE OF TESTIMONIAL PROSE
–“the left and right both argue for inclusion but along different lines.”– A Friend
Dysgenic expansion on the left (female), vs eugenic expansion on the right (male)
Female and male strategies compete. Or perhaps ‘adapt’ is a better way of looking at it.
So ‘along different lines’ obscure that those lines are not ‘relative’ but produce vastly different externalities.
This is an example why I use operational langauge and full accounting – I don’t leave obscurant statements un accounted for.
Testimonialism:
1 – Operational Language (Operations are measurements)
2 – Deflated vocabular tested by series.
3 – Complete Sentences describing complete transactions.
4 – Testing Rational Choice, and Reciprocity
5 – Accounting for the seen (internal) and unseen (external).
By simple use of operational grammar (the rules I just stated) we test categorical, logical, empirical, existential, rational, reciprocal, fully accounted prose just a surely as we test any statement in other logics and mathematics.
In other words, just as all other forms of calculation falsify but do not justify, operational grammar falsified but does not justify.
The only difference is that operational grammar is complete in that it includes all actionable dimensions of reality, not some subset or general rule of reality.
If one cannot make such a statement in operational language he knows not of what he speaks. He just uses convention and habit like any other storyteller.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-18 13:09:00 UTC
-
Peterson Explained:
He is attempting (unconsciously) to restore Stoicism (Self authoring) while also restoring mythology because of the correlation between our intuitions (biology) and archetypes (narratives). In this sense he is reforming religion from supernatural to scientific. We all carry our class, culture, and religion with us. We don’t know how much of it is genetic, and how much learned. It’s probably like all else, more genetic than we wish to admit. We all intuit man as between Rousseau’s and Hobbes’ vision. The evidence is ‘neither’. Pinker intuits closer to rousseau and is optimistic, Peterson more towards Smith, and Pessimistic. These are assessments and intuitons not evidentiary truths. If we look at history, man is amoral: moral(reciprocal) immoral (irreciprocal) as suits him. We have just made it increasingly costly to prefer immorality (free riding, parasitism, predation) over morality (voluntary, fully informed, productive exchange). And as such vastly increased the time man devotes to moral activity, and the disproportionate returns on trade. -
PETERSON EXPLAINED: He is attempting (unconsciously) to restore Stoicism (Self a
PETERSON EXPLAINED:
He is attempting (unconsciously) to restore Stoicism (Self authoring) while also restoring mythology because of the correlation between our intuitions (biology) and archetypes (narratives). In this sense he is reforming religion from supernatural to scientific.
We all carry our class, culture, and religion with us. We don’t know how much of it is genetic, and how much learned. It’s probably like all else, more genetic than we wish to admit. We all intuit man as between Rousseau’s and Hobbes’ vision. The evidence is ‘neither’.
Pinker intuits closer to rousseau and is optimistic, Peterson more towards Smith, and Pessimistic. These are assessments and intuitons not evidentiary truths. If we look at history, man is amoral: moral(reciprocal) immoral (irreciprocal) as suits him.
We have just made it increasingly costly to prefer immorality (free riding, parasitism, predation) over morality (voluntary, fully informed, productive exchange). And as such vastly increased the time man devotes to moral activity, and the disproportionate returns on trade.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-18 12:37:00 UTC
-
Peterson Explained:
He is attempting (unconsciously) to restore Stoicism (Self authoring) while also restoring mythology because of the correlation between our intuitions (biology) and archetypes (narratives). In this sense he is reforming religion from supernatural to scientific. We all carry our class, culture, and religion with us. We don’t know how much of it is genetic, and how much learned. It’s probably like all else, more genetic than we wish to admit. We all intuit man as between Rousseau’s and Hobbes’ vision. The evidence is ‘neither’. Pinker intuits closer to rousseau and is optimistic, Peterson more towards Smith, and Pessimistic. These are assessments and intuitons not evidentiary truths. If we look at history, man is amoral: moral(reciprocal) immoral (irreciprocal) as suits him. We have just made it increasingly costly to prefer immorality (free riding, parasitism, predation) over morality (voluntary, fully informed, productive exchange). And as such vastly increased the time man devotes to moral activity, and the disproportionate returns on trade. -
I’m Inexperienced With Women And I Never Know What Is The Next Step To Take. What Should I Do?
Stop thinking of them as women, and just other people you talk to. Learn to be friends. Then in a few years you will find a woman. You are too underdeveloped socially to be worth anything to a woman. Women are not stupid. They know you are not worthy yet.
https://www.quora.com/Im-inexperienced-with-women-and-I-never-know-what-is-the-next-step-to-take-What-should-I-do