Psychopathy like autism is not a problem other than incentives are more important to psychopaths than normies. One of the reasons for (((other groups))) success with our high trust group is that they are in fact more sociopathic.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-21 12:40:00 UTC
—“Intelligence creates an environment of maturity, respect and purpose. The lack of intelligence results in chaotic competition for anything and everything.” — Tom Watt
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-21 09:16:00 UTC
I think SAT’s are the best proxy we currently have in freely available data. I think they are at best useful for determining sortition for university work – in other words, they successfully fulfill their purpose. They are problematic proxies for IQ since some of us (myself included) do not really reach our biological IQ until our early twenties, and others are completed by late high school. I have very high confidence in Ravens. However, while iq traits tend to scale, in heritable IQ there is an asymmetry between Spatial and Verbal, with heritability of verbal more dependent on the mother. This is rather obvious in retrospect, and explains why some groups with high verbal performance also express higher rates of homosexuality and behavioral effeminacy.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-21 09:14:00 UTC
All general rules of arbitrary precision must of necessity refer to a distribution. The fact that there may be voluntary and involuntary outliers in that distribution does not influence the correspondence of the general rule. It is nearly impossible for women to learn to think as such for evolutionary reasons. It is necessary for men to think as such, for those same reasons. This is why ‘compatibility but inequality’ thesis is the best to live by. We must know when the other ‘sensibility’ (female case, male general rule) provides the answer to the question. Apr 19, 2018 7:57pm
All general rules of arbitrary precision must of necessity refer to a distribution. The fact that there may be voluntary and involuntary outliers in that distribution does not influence the correspondence of the general rule. It is nearly impossible for women to learn to think as such for evolutionary reasons. It is necessary for men to think as such, for those same reasons. This is why ‘compatibility but inequality’ thesis is the best to live by. We must know when the other ‘sensibility’ (female case, male general rule) provides the answer to the question. Apr 19, 2018 7:57pm
The way to understand personality traits is to fill in the blanks: “In negotiations with others [trait] helps me with ….. ” 1) Ordliness (risk minimization) <-vs–> (reward maximization) Industriousness 2) Confrontation (risk minimization) <–vs–> (opportunity maximization) Politeness. As far as I know all emotions can be expressed in three dimensions: x) Dominance (Aggression) vs (Flight) Submission y) Pain vs Pleasure. z) Excitement vs Calm
The way to understand personality traits is to fill in the blanks: “In negotiations with others [trait] helps me with ….. ” 1) Ordliness (risk minimization) <-vs–> (reward maximization) Industriousness 2) Confrontation (risk minimization) <–vs–> (opportunity maximization) Politeness. As far as I know all emotions can be expressed in three dimensions: x) Dominance (Aggression) vs (Flight) Submission y) Pain vs Pleasure. z) Excitement vs Calm
THE INVERSION OF THE IQ CONTROVERSY The IQ Controversy misses the point that it is not so much exceptional ability, which exists in all groups, that is so demonstrably advantageous for the GROUP, but the relative absence of lack of ability at the bottom end that is advantageous for the group. In other words, one can raise the average IQ of a group by trying to increase the number at the top, despite regression to the mean, or one can reduce the number at the bottom thereby changing the mean to which populations regress. And while we now know that lower intelligence is the product of accumulated defects, and that higher intelligence is the produce of eliminating defects, not necessarily any particular gain, the problem should be fairly obvious in that the greatest investment peoples can make in their present and future is the suppression of reproduction in the lower classes in exchange for redistribution.
THE INVERSION OF THE IQ CONTROVERSY The IQ Controversy misses the point that it is not so much exceptional ability, which exists in all groups, that is so demonstrably advantageous for the GROUP, but the relative absence of lack of ability at the bottom end that is advantageous for the group. In other words, one can raise the average IQ of a group by trying to increase the number at the top, despite regression to the mean, or one can reduce the number at the bottom thereby changing the mean to which populations regress. And while we now know that lower intelligence is the product of accumulated defects, and that higher intelligence is the produce of eliminating defects, not necessarily any particular gain, the problem should be fairly obvious in that the greatest investment peoples can make in their present and future is the suppression of reproduction in the lower classes in exchange for redistribution.
ROUGH DISTRIBUTION OF IQ BY DEGREE. Now, what these distributions tell us is that the Minimum IQ for university level courses (calculations) is > 120 rather than the past > 115. And That means, again, that all university degrees are nonsense under 120, and that this vast debt does nothing but indoctrinate people into the cult of the state. — Learn by invention – 130 Physics 129 Mathematics 128.5 Computer Science 128 Economics 127.5 Chemical engineering 127 Material Science 126 Electrical Engineering 125.5 Mechanical Engineering — Learn by research — 125 Philosophy 124 Chemistry 123 Earth Sciences 122 Industrial Engineering 122 Civil Engineering 121.5 Biology — Learn by reading- 120.1 English/Literature 120 Religion/Theology 119.8 Political Science 119.7 History 118 Art History 117.7 Anthropology 116.5 Architecture — Learn by instruction- 116 Business 115 Sociology 114 Medicine (nursing etc) 112 Communication (marketing) 109 Education 106 Public Administration — Learn by imitation – ( … ) to 93. — Learn by repetition- ( … ) to 85. — Limited ability to learn – ( … ) below 85 IN PRISONS AS WELL – THE BOTTOM DETERMINES THE MEDIAN —“We definitely don’t understand the entire package as far as how IQ explains the process leading to an inmate engaging in misbehavior,” Morris said. “It’s more about IQ playing a role, and that it’s not only about a particular person’s IQ, but it’s about collective IQ in an environment of confinement.”—