Curt Doolittle

Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • Degree vs IQ – And Where I Get My Categories.

    ROUGH DISTRIBUTION OF IQ BY DEGREE. Now, what these distributions tell us is that the Minimum IQ for university level courses (calculations) is > 120 rather than the past > 115. And That means, again, that all university degrees are nonsense under 120, and that this vast debt does nothing but indoctrinate people into the cult of the state. — Learn by invention – 130 Physics 129 Mathematics 128.5 Computer Science 128 Economics 127.5 Chemical engineering 127 Material Science 126 Electrical Engineering 125.5 Mechanical Engineering — Learn by research — 125 Philosophy 124 Chemistry 123 Earth Sciences 122 Industrial Engineering 122 Civil Engineering 121.5 Biology — Learn by reading- 120.1 English/Literature 120 Religion/Theology 119.8 Political Science 119.7 History 118 Art History 117.7 Anthropology 116.5 Architecture — Learn by instruction- 116 Business 115 Sociology 114 Medicine (nursing etc) 112 Communication (marketing) 109 Education 106 Public Administration — Learn by imitation – ( … ) to 93. — Learn by repetition- ( … ) to 85. — Limited ability to learn – ( … ) below 85 IN PRISONS AS WELL – THE BOTTOM DETERMINES THE MEDIAN —“We definitely don’t understand the entire package as far as how IQ explains the process leading to an inmate engaging in misbehavior,” Morris said. “It’s more about IQ playing a role, and that it’s not only about a particular person’s IQ, but it’s about collective IQ in an environment of confinement.”—

  • ROUGH DISTRIBUTION OF IQ BY DEGREE. Now, what these distributions tell us is tha

    ROUGH DISTRIBUTION OF IQ BY DEGREE.

    Now, what these distributions tell us is that the Minimum IQ for university level courses (calculations) is > 120 rather than the past > 115. And That means, again, that all university degrees are nonsense under 120, and that this vast debt does nothing but indoctrinate people into the cult of the state.

    — learn by invention –

    130 Physics

    129 Mathematics

    128.5 Computer Science

    128 Economics

    127.5 Chemical engineering

    127 Material Science

    126 Electrical Engineering

    125.5 Mechanical Engineering

    — learn by research —

    125 Philosophy

    124 Chemistry

    123 Earth Sciences

    122 Industrial Engineering

    122 Civil Engineering

    121.5 Biology

    — learn by reading-

    120.1 English/Literature

    120 Religion/Theology

    119.8 Political Science

    119.7 History

    118 Art History

    117.7 Anthropology

    116.5 Architecture

    116 Business

    –learn by instruction-

    115 Sociology

    114 Medicine (nursing etc)

    112 Communication (marketing)

    –learn by repetition –

    109 Education

    106 Public Administration

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-20 17:32:00 UTC

  • IN PRISONS AS WELL – THE BOTTOM DETERMINES THE MEDIAN —“We definitely don’t un

    IN PRISONS AS WELL – THE BOTTOM DETERMINES THE MEDIAN

    —“We definitely don’t understand the entire package as far as how IQ explains the process leading to an inmate engaging in misbehavior,” Morris said. “It’s more about IQ playing a role, and that it’s not only about a particular person’s IQ, but it’s about collective IQ in an environment of confinement.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-20 16:14:00 UTC

  • My understanding is two sexes and therefore two genders develop from neutral ste

    My understanding is two sexes and therefore two genders develop from neutral stem, but failure of expression in utero, failure of expression in development, failure of expression due to trauma, and that infantilization via suppression of play, lack of exercise, diet, and exposure to manmade chemistry in the environment is the primary cause of variations in expression.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-20 16:08:00 UTC

  • THE INVERSION OF THE IQ CONTROVERSY The IQ Controversy misses the point that it

    THE INVERSION OF THE IQ CONTROVERSY

    The IQ Controversy misses the point that it is not so much exceptional ability, which exists in all groups, that is so demonstrably advantageous for the GROUP, but the relative absence of lack of ability at the bottom end that is advantageous for the group. In other words, one can raise the average IQ of a group by trying to increase the number at the top, despite regression to the mean, or one can reduce the number at the bottom thereby changing the mean to which populations regress. And while we now know that lower intelligence is the product of accumulated defects, and that higher intelligence is the produce of eliminating defects, not necessarily any particular gain, the problem should be fairly obvious in that the greatest investment peoples can make in their present and future is the suppression of reproduction in the lower classes in exchange for redistribution.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-20 10:37:00 UTC

  • My answer to Which ethnicities are known to have the smartest people on average?

    My answer to Which ethnicities are known to have the smartest people on average? https://www.quora.com/Which-ethnicities-are-known-to-have-the-smartest-people-on-average/answer/Curt-Doolittle?srid=u4Qv

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-19 23:47:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/987115458066370560

  • The way to understand personality traits is to fill in the blanks: “In negotiati

    The way to understand personality traits is to fill in the blanks:

    “In negotiations with others [trait] helps me with ….. “

    1) Ordliness (risk minimization) <-vs–> (reward maximization) Industriousness

    2) Confrontation (risk minimization) <–vs–> (opportunity maximization) Politeness.

    As far as I know all emotions can be expressed in three dimensions:

    x) Dominance (Aggression) vs (Flight) Submission

    y) Pain vs Pleasure.

    z) Excitement vs Calm

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-19 20:34:00 UTC

  • MALE AND FEMALE COGNITIVE COMPATIBILITY All general rules of arbitrary precision

    MALE AND FEMALE COGNITIVE COMPATIBILITY

    All general rules of arbitrary precision must of necessity refer to a distribution. The fact that there may be voluntary and involuntary outliers in that distribution does not influence the correspondence of the general rule. It is nearly impossible for women to learn to think as such for evolutionary reasons. It is necessary for men to think as such, for those same reasons. This is why ‘compatibility but inequality’ thesis is the best to live by. We must know when the other ‘sensibility’ (female case, male general rule) provides the answer to the question.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-19 19:57:00 UTC

  • Male and Female Reproductive Cognitive Biases

    Science helps us in matters of mutual misunderstanding between men and women (Or the male brain and female brain): 1) There is a female, genetic, cognitive bias, toward Solipsism, or what women generally refer to as “personalizing” an argument; 2) Just as there is a related female, genetic, cognitive bias to argue the person rather than the argument; 3) just as there is a related female genetic, cognitive bias to NAXALT (“not all x are like that”) – which is the failure to intuit the difference between a distribution (curve) and equality (line); 4) Just as there is a related female genetic cognitive bias to conflate the desirable/undesirable, with the good/true. And… you are demonstrating all those female, genetic, cognitive biases that evolution gave you, so that you would protect your children from any form of outcasting (negative differentiation, boycott) that would limit their chances of prosperity – or even survival. I am not a woman, with solipsistic cognitive biases for the purpose of protecting my offspring, but a man, with analytic cognitive biases for the purpose of maintaining or increasing the competitive capacity of the tribe that consists of my brothers our mates, and offspring. As such while it is in your reproductive interest to be ‘confused’ to some degree, it is in my reproductive interests to not be. You cannot afford to fail to grasp the world of threats to your offspring as it is, just as I cannot afford to fail grasp the world of threats to my tribe as it is. Ergo, I don’t confuse the good/bad with the true/false, nor make the mistake of equality vs distribution, nor deny the overwhelming evidence of demonstrated human nature (prostitution vs war) throughout all of human and pre-human history. What I understand you to be saying is that you do not want the public to hold a low opinion of women like you because it would put you at an even greater status disadvantage than you had been in the past. And that I can understand. But conversely, I don’t make the mistake of saying that because males disproportionately commit violent crime, that there is any chance I will commit violent crime. Nor would I say it was bad or false to say that they do so. Truth is truth. Period. Apr 19, 2018 5:21am

  • Male and Female Reproductive Cognitive Biases

    Science helps us in matters of mutual misunderstanding between men and women (Or the male brain and female brain): 1) There is a female, genetic, cognitive bias, toward Solipsism, or what women generally refer to as “personalizing” an argument; 2) Just as there is a related female, genetic, cognitive bias to argue the person rather than the argument; 3) just as there is a related female genetic, cognitive bias to NAXALT (“not all x are like that”) – which is the failure to intuit the difference between a distribution (curve) and equality (line); 4) Just as there is a related female genetic cognitive bias to conflate the desirable/undesirable, with the good/true. And… you are demonstrating all those female, genetic, cognitive biases that evolution gave you, so that you would protect your children from any form of outcasting (negative differentiation, boycott) that would limit their chances of prosperity – or even survival. I am not a woman, with solipsistic cognitive biases for the purpose of protecting my offspring, but a man, with analytic cognitive biases for the purpose of maintaining or increasing the competitive capacity of the tribe that consists of my brothers our mates, and offspring. As such while it is in your reproductive interest to be ‘confused’ to some degree, it is in my reproductive interests to not be. You cannot afford to fail to grasp the world of threats to your offspring as it is, just as I cannot afford to fail grasp the world of threats to my tribe as it is. Ergo, I don’t confuse the good/bad with the true/false, nor make the mistake of equality vs distribution, nor deny the overwhelming evidence of demonstrated human nature (prostitution vs war) throughout all of human and pre-human history. What I understand you to be saying is that you do not want the public to hold a low opinion of women like you because it would put you at an even greater status disadvantage than you had been in the past. And that I can understand. But conversely, I don’t make the mistake of saying that because males disproportionately commit violent crime, that there is any chance I will commit violent crime. Nor would I say it was bad or false to say that they do so. Truth is truth. Period. Apr 19, 2018 5:21am