Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • Which KIND of advantage. My private school was a social and emotional paradise c

    Which KIND of advantage. My private school was a social and emotional paradise compared to public school. I can’t find many who disagree. How do we measure socialization?


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-27 20:09:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1056276845505773568

    Reply addressees: @DegenRolf

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1054761417105174530


    IN REPLY TO:

    @DegenRolf

    Pupils enrolled in private elementary schools did not show any performance advantages compared to those in public elementary schools. https://t.co/tRUuefr6q1 https://t.co/9wM6rWqYub

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1054761417105174530

  • RT @DegenRolf: “Social media use, while weakly and negatively associated with th

    RT @DegenRolf: “Social media use, while weakly and negatively associated with the quality of day, seems to displace other affectively unple…


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-27 20:07:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1056276139092656134

  • RT @DegenRolf: American men tend to overestimate how much sex and how many sex p

    RT @DegenRolf: American men tend to overestimate how much sex and how many sex partners women have on average. https://www.amazon.com/Perils-Perception-Wrong-Nearly-Everything/dp/1786494566/ref=sr_1_cc_1?s=aps&ie=UTF8&qid=1540539569&sr=1-1-catcorr&keywords=the+perils+of+perception http…


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-27 20:04:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1056275401377497090

  • Rolf, DIdn’t you recently promote that paper on clustering in the big 5? That wa

    Rolf, DIdn’t you recently promote that paper on clustering in the big 5? That was premature but closer to my understanding of the division of perceptual, cognitive, negotiative, labor.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-27 19:51:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1056272299488432134

    Reply addressees: @DegenRolf

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1056075016272535552


    IN REPLY TO:

    @DegenRolf

    Too much of a good thing: All “desirable” personality traits become counterproductive if too pronounced, turning from virtues into vice.
    https://t.co/eh4rRr2Jkp https://t.co/4WEqottcDm

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1056075016272535552

  • What I like about this is evolution from (a) Freudian (clown world), (b) jungian

    What I like about this is evolution from (a) Freudian (clown world), (b) jungian( better and close to literary evidence), (c) big 5 better but therapeutic so seeking IDEAL rather than optimum NETWORK (Division of Labor) traits which results in different distributions of traits.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-27 19:50:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1056272024878891008

    Reply addressees: @DegenRolf

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1056075016272535552


    IN REPLY TO:

    @DegenRolf

    Too much of a good thing: All “desirable” personality traits become counterproductive if too pronounced, turning from virtues into vice.
    https://t.co/eh4rRr2Jkp https://t.co/4WEqottcDm

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1056075016272535552

  • What is the tested relationship between your ‘abbreviated’ test and the full fiv

    What is the tested relationship between your ‘abbreviated’ test and the full five factor. (if it’s in there I didn’t see it) Because either I don’t undrestand something or you’re just generating noise, which is why you’re getting lower correspondence than MBTI.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-27 19:46:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1056270995001147392

    Reply addressees: @BrentWRoberts @DegenRolf @PsychoSchmitt

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1056203339267039235


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1056203339267039235

  • What Defines ‘human’?

    October 27th, 2018 11:41 AM WHAT DEFINES ‘HUMAN’?

    —“Is it possible that you have too high a standard for what qualifies as human?”– Joel Harvey

    [W]ell, that begs the question standard for what purpose? 1 – For cooperating commercially (trade on means) – yes. 2 – For socializing (exchanging information – on ends) – no. 3 – For political organization (cooperating on ends and means) – absolutely not. One does not let wild animals, domesticated animals, domesticated pets, children, or insufficiently domesticated and trained humans to influence that which they lack the agency to decide without harm to others.

  • Very few of us are yet human

    October 27th, 2018 11:10 AM WHO IS AND ISN’T HUMAN?

    —“Curt, Who isn’t currently human?”—Joel Harvey

    [I]s the line of demarcation between human and animal: 1) Morphology? 2) Sentience? (Reaction to stimuli) 3) Awareness? (Sympathy-intent/Empathy-experience/Imitation-action) 4) Speech? 5) Reason? (Agency) As far as I know, it is reason and agency which separates us from the animals. That means very few of us are yet human. The rest are in different stages of domesticated animal. And I suspect that number (percentage) corresponds to the pareto minimum. Yes, really. Our process of self domestication is far from complete. It is merely sufficient for west and to a lesser degree, east, to drag mankind out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, filth, poverty, starvation, disease, plagues, suffering, child mortality, early death, continuous violence, and the vicissitudes of nature. |HUMAN| The gods we aspire to be < Trained Humans < untrained humans < trained animals < untrained animals < untrainable animals. We domesticated plants, those animals we could domesticate, and those humans we could domesticate. We just left the job unfinished.

  • Arguing with The Left (feminine-Cognitive Process) Male

    October 27th, 2018 10:58 AM ARGUING WITH THE LEFT (FEMININE-COGNITIVE PROCESS) MALE

    —“I knew it, A veritable scream, I would play organ music and do bongs whilst you chanted in the corner, Ya crack stinks fella, Keep it snappy, 5-second attention span when looking at anything that doesn’t flash, squelch or explode.”— Damien Woodgate

    [A]gain. A statement of psychologism, the feminine substitute for argument, by use of “disapproval, shaming, ridicule, gossiping, rallying, reputation destruction, and straw manning”, where the “straw manning” most commonly consists of mirroring the feminine emotional overwhelming of any semblance of agency or reason. Statement of fact. You have no intrinsic value. You have no value to me or mine. You cannot use the tactics of females because you do not have sex, affection, care, reproduction, or ally-negotiation to trade. You must produce some form of value to trade with me and mine, and demonstrate your fitness to trade with me and mine, BEFORE you have any value, and therefore BEFORE your attempted threat of non-cooperation, undermining, reputation destruction has any persuasive value. There is a reason for paternalism: sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, rule of law, and markets in everything – so that we domesticate the animals-that-speak, into the humans through training, education, and controlling their breeding. We domesticated the animal man. We have unfortunately left the job incomplete – as only some of us are currently human.

  • What Defines ‘human’?

    October 27th, 2018 11:41 AM WHAT DEFINES ‘HUMAN’?

    —“Is it possible that you have too high a standard for what qualifies as human?”– Joel Harvey

    [W]ell, that begs the question standard for what purpose? 1 – For cooperating commercially (trade on means) – yes. 2 – For socializing (exchanging information – on ends) – no. 3 – For political organization (cooperating on ends and means) – absolutely not. One does not let wild animals, domesticated animals, domesticated pets, children, or insufficiently domesticated and trained humans to influence that which they lack the agency to decide without harm to others.