The HERD is not conscious. The NPC meme is merely recognition of the HERD, and the END of the hope for any form of equanimity. Old right = hopeful. New Right = RESIGNED. https://twitter.com/BasedTorba/status/1057507652803137536
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-31 12:54:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057616691268608000
THE GENETICS AND INSTINCTS OF THE GENDERS AND A THREAT TO CIVILIZATION WITHOUT CONSTRAINING LIMITS.
Males are hyper-producers and females hyper-consumers. That’s the evidence. the problem is that without reciprocal markets in everything to limit women to trades, of family to limit women to family resources, or Paternalism to limit to women our local judgement, then the hyperconsumption includes everything: genetic capital, territorial capital, institutional capital, traditional capital, normative capital,
There is no end to woman’s wants for self, nest, and self image by obtaining signals for giving away that which others (men) have produced. Women produce income, and offspring and consumption. Men produce civilization. And if not limited by men, they will destroy the very men who made their hyperconsumption possible.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-31 09:43:00 UTC
October 30th, 2018 12:55 PM AGAIN, ALL STEREOTYPES ARE TRUE
First Impressions of Personality Traits From Body Shapes Ying Hu, Connor J. Parde, Matthew Q. Hill, … First Published October 22, 2018 Research Article https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618799300 https://t.co/zCti4BNwcT Abstract People infer the personalities of others from their facial appearance. Whether they do so from body shapes is less studied. We explored personality inferences made from body shapes. Participants rated personality traits for male and female bodies generated with a three-dimensional body model. Multivariate spaces created from these ratings indicated that people evaluate bodies on valence and agency in ways that directly contrast positive and negative traits from the Big Five domains. Body-trait stereotypes based on the trait ratings revealed a myriad of diverse body shapes that typify individual traits. Personality-trait profiles were predicted reliably from a subset of the body-shape features used to specify the three-dimensional bodies. Body features related to extraversion and conscientiousness were predicted with the highest consensus, followed by openness traits. This study provides the first comprehensive look at the range, diversity, and reliability of personality inferences that people make from body shapes.
October 30th, 2018 11:49 AM [S]o we have the genes for autobiographical (perfect) memory and we know the brain structure required. We have the genes for eliminating or drastically reducing pain. We have the genes for eliminating lactic acid buildup that would let us run continuously without tiring. We have the genes for heart size that improve our exercise ability. We have the genes for muscle density that improve our strength. It will take longer to find the genes for intelligence since there appear to be many involved, and it may be a developmental consequence of complexity. We will eventually find a way to prohibit errors in replication that give rise to accumulated cellular damage and eventually cancer. And it’s not inconceivable that we could begin our productive lives at 5-7 years old, and live in good health to well over 100. So, that revolution, if it is on the horizon, will be the next ‘big thing’. And one must choose between that vision (musk and augmentation) versus independent sentient machines (which I think will remain forever expensive, and I’m not sure will innovate faster than networks of humans will.)
October 30th, 2018 12:55 PM AGAIN, ALL STEREOTYPES ARE TRUE
First Impressions of Personality Traits From Body Shapes Ying Hu, Connor J. Parde, Matthew Q. Hill, … First Published October 22, 2018 Research Article https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618799300 https://t.co/zCti4BNwcT Abstract People infer the personalities of others from their facial appearance. Whether they do so from body shapes is less studied. We explored personality inferences made from body shapes. Participants rated personality traits for male and female bodies generated with a three-dimensional body model. Multivariate spaces created from these ratings indicated that people evaluate bodies on valence and agency in ways that directly contrast positive and negative traits from the Big Five domains. Body-trait stereotypes based on the trait ratings revealed a myriad of diverse body shapes that typify individual traits. Personality-trait profiles were predicted reliably from a subset of the body-shape features used to specify the three-dimensional bodies. Body features related to extraversion and conscientiousness were predicted with the highest consensus, followed by openness traits. This study provides the first comprehensive look at the range, diversity, and reliability of personality inferences that people make from body shapes.
October 30th, 2018 11:49 AM [S]o we have the genes for autobiographical (perfect) memory and we know the brain structure required. We have the genes for eliminating or drastically reducing pain. We have the genes for eliminating lactic acid buildup that would let us run continuously without tiring. We have the genes for heart size that improve our exercise ability. We have the genes for muscle density that improve our strength. It will take longer to find the genes for intelligence since there appear to be many involved, and it may be a developmental consequence of complexity. We will eventually find a way to prohibit errors in replication that give rise to accumulated cellular damage and eventually cancer. And it’s not inconceivable that we could begin our productive lives at 5-7 years old, and live in good health to well over 100. So, that revolution, if it is on the horizon, will be the next ‘big thing’. And one must choose between that vision (musk and augmentation) versus independent sentient machines (which I think will remain forever expensive, and I’m not sure will innovate faster than networks of humans will.)
October 30th, 2018 2:13 PM “WE MUST RESTORE LIMITS TO THE TAKER” by Luke Weinhagen [I]n taking ruthlessness (competition unhindered by forbearance) off the table we have allowed “I kill you and take your stuff” to be replaced with “I outvote you and take your stuff”. It is the same threat of violence underpinning both iterations, but the latter removes the limit of direct risk to the taker. We need to be ruthless enough to restore limits to the taker, no matter how the taker fills in the blank within the statement “I ________ you and take you stuff”. What the parasite fills the blank with (guilt, shame, lies, demographics, etc…), ruthlessness must match. In short – We need to say ‘No” and ruthlessly mean it.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45027819_10156743541582264_3991473022690131968_o_10156743541572264.jpg AGAIN, ALL STEREOTYPES ARE TRUE
https://t.co/zCti4BNwcTAGAIN, ALL STEREOTYPES ARE TRUE
https://t.co/zCti4BNwcT
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-30 12:55:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/45027819_10156743541582264_3991473022690131968_o_10156743541572264.jpg AGAIN, ALL STEREOTYPES ARE TRUE
https://t.co/zCti4BNwcTAGAIN, ALL STEREOTYPES ARE TRUE
https://t.co/zCti4BNwcT
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-30 12:55:00 UTC
So we have the genes for autobiographical (perfect) memory and we know the brain structure required. We have the genes for eliminating lactic acid buildup that would let us run continuously without tiring. We have the genes for heart size that improve our exercise ability. We have the genes for muscle density that improve our strength. It will take longer to find the genes for intelligence since there appear to be many involved, and it may be a developmental consequence of complexity. We will eventually find a way to prohibit errors in replication that give rise to accumulated cellular damage and eventually cancer. And it’s not inconceivable that we could begin our productive lives at 5-7 years old, and live in good health to well over 100. So, that revolution, if it is on the horizon, will be the next ‘big thing’. And one must choose between that vision (musk and augmentation) versus independent sentient machines (which I think will remain forever expensive, and I’m not sure will innovate faster than networks of humans will.)
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-30 11:49:00 UTC