Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • Genes: Left ‘stupid’ is emotional, sophomoric, proportional rather than reciproc

    Genes: Left ‘stupid’ is emotional, sophomoric, proportional rather than reciprocal; Libertarian ‘stupid’ is just sophomoric but reciprocal. Right ‘stupid’ is just hyperbolic correspondence – weak examples. Groups differ in means of sophistry b/c our genetic cognitive differences.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-18 16:41:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174362914716827648

  • Hmm.. Not sure about this one. Pretty sure It’s driven by sortition. Uni/College

    Hmm.. Not sure about this one. Pretty sure It’s driven by sortition. Uni/College produces largely a filtering, sorting, norming, and match-making function. And cites don’t include the contrary findings against class rotation, and that it’s wealth and sorting – not equality.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-18 11:53:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174290274954240000

    Reply addressees: @DegenRolf

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174282115715862529


    IN REPLY TO:

    @DegenRolf

    Genes and Gini: The higher the economic equality, the greater is the heritability of educational outcomes in a population. https://t.co/BRpX7r61No https://t.co/ujwyhx9p1T

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174282115715862529

  • must make predictions with sparse information using sparse information from past

    … must make predictions with sparse information using sparse information from past experiences in real time. most of our decisions are such errors, but we recalculate and adapt and adjust moment by moment, and our memory reassembles success or failure from fragments.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 22:08:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174082809272647681

    Reply addressees: @SamHarrisOrg

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174082438508752896


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @SamHarrisOrg Free Will like most philosophical parlor games is just a sophism, that frames (by suggestion) choice as a via positiva dependent upon knowledge, rather than prediction from field consisting largely of errors (via negativa). A suitably complex robot, like us,…

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174082438508752896


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @SamHarrisOrg Free Will like most philosophical parlor games is just a sophism, that frames (by suggestion) choice as a via positiva dependent upon knowledge, rather than prediction from field consisting largely of errors (via negativa). A suitably complex robot, like us,…

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174082438508752896

  • BTW: intelligence is second to conscientiousness in economic productivity but no

    BTW: intelligence is second to conscientiousness in economic productivity but not in economic complexity.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 20:46:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174061983869689856

    Reply addressees: @_inline_ @Biorealism @charliekirk11 @TuckerCarlson @thespandrell @Steve_Sailer

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174061758157336577


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @_inline_ @Biorealism @charliekirk11 @TuckerCarlson @thespandrell @Steve_Sailer No but it is the foundation of every surviving civilizational paradigm, calculation, argument, science, and law. Far less than one percent of us matter. In biological terms, the primary function of mosts is to create a division of labor sufficient to produce a few geniuses.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174061758157336577


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @_inline_ @Biorealism @charliekirk11 @TuckerCarlson @thespandrell @Steve_Sailer No but it is the foundation of every surviving civilizational paradigm, calculation, argument, science, and law. Far less than one percent of us matter. In biological terms, the primary function of mosts is to create a division of labor sufficient to produce a few geniuses.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174061758157336577

  • I mean, you don’t know that you’re doing it right now. You think (as would all c

    I mean, you don’t know that you’re doing it right now. You think (as would all cognitively female humans) that you’re making an argument but you’re just engaging in reputation destruction rather than argument, and from a position of presumption bias and ignorance.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 20:25:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174056778583162880

    Reply addressees: @Simon_Whitten

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174056452677353472


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @Simon_Whitten … state against the people (See Benjamin Ginsberg), against the people, inability to create commons of their own, dependence on higher trust moral polities. Match this with differences in rates of mental illness and sexual dimorphism (cognitive, sexual, behavioral, criminal),

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174056452677353472


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @Simon_Whitten … state against the people (See Benjamin Ginsberg), against the people, inability to create commons of their own, dependence on higher trust moral polities. Match this with differences in rates of mental illness and sexual dimorphism (cognitive, sexual, behavioral, criminal),

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174056452677353472

  • Uniting Conservatives with Understanding of One Another

    Let’s put this in scientific prose: Conservatism is a genetic disposition evidenced in cognition, emotion, and action, of higher disgust response, higher preference for hierarchy (division of responsibility and labor), higher loyalty response. The fact that churcy christians use religion, moral christians use moralizing, educated moral christians use history, and educated moral, scientific christians use science and law is just a function of whether one is more dependent upon intuition, social interaction, or abstract reason. In other words, we are unified in our disgust response, we differ in our means of information processing, and because we differ in our means of information processing, we differ in our means of expression, advocacy ad argument. And because we are resistant to adaptation without overwhelming evidence, hypersensitive to loyalty, and hypersensitive to hierarchy, we want everyone to adopt our means of information processing and means of expression, advocacy and argument. But despite our differences in expression, what remains consistent across the faithful, the moral, the rational, and the scientific spectrum of conservatives is the natural law and the natural law’s intolerance for disgusting behavior whether intellectual, emotional, or physical, and whether in private, or the commons. If you cannot accept our cognitive tribes of conservatives as all unified under the natural law regardless of means of expressing that natural law as divine law, as moral utility, as rational practicality, and as scientific necessity, then YOU ARE THE REASON THE RIGHT FAILS. The faithful are the largest problem because they cannot tolerate their dogma as consisting only of wisdom literature (analogy and advice) rather than truth (description and decidability). Yet to win together we must deliver unto god what is god’s (faith we cannot testify to) and deliver unto caesar what is his (truth we can testify to). We cannot unite behind one paradigm of thinking, advocating, and arguing. We can only understand that we share the same instincts, wants, desires, goals for the same biological reasons regardless of their origin, and that we are right to save ourselves, our people, and humanity from disgusting thoughts, feelings and actions whether public or private. Because disgusting thoughts, feelings, and actions are imitated and spread like any disease, and man is more vulnerable to diseases of the mind than he is to those of emotions and body. We argue, and I argue, the faithful are the weakness in our civilization. It was evangelical women who brought about the chain of events that led to our current condition. It was catholic voters that brought about the leftist politicians. It was christians who gave passage to the ‘others’ who are the enemy. It is christians who idolize the enemy and its history instead of themselves and their history. So we must not argue excuses, because each conservative tribe argues with excuses within its paradigm. The only paradigm we need share is that we must eradicate what is disgusting from ourselves, our families, our polities, aour nations, and the world. And whether your god is Jehovah, Sky Father, Odin, Aristotle, the Constitution of natural law or the laws of the universe, none of them will tolerate disgust, and we will not survive without cleansing the world of it, and the universe of it afterward. We all know evil and it is disgusting and we share our disgust of thought, feeling, word, and deed. They are the disease. We are the cure. If that is not a god’s purpose for us then I know no other.

  • Uniting Conservatives with Understanding of One Another

    Let’s put this in scientific prose: Conservatism is a genetic disposition evidenced in cognition, emotion, and action, of higher disgust response, higher preference for hierarchy (division of responsibility and labor), higher loyalty response. The fact that churcy christians use religion, moral christians use moralizing, educated moral christians use history, and educated moral, scientific christians use science and law is just a function of whether one is more dependent upon intuition, social interaction, or abstract reason. In other words, we are unified in our disgust response, we differ in our means of information processing, and because we differ in our means of information processing, we differ in our means of expression, advocacy ad argument. And because we are resistant to adaptation without overwhelming evidence, hypersensitive to loyalty, and hypersensitive to hierarchy, we want everyone to adopt our means of information processing and means of expression, advocacy and argument. But despite our differences in expression, what remains consistent across the faithful, the moral, the rational, and the scientific spectrum of conservatives is the natural law and the natural law’s intolerance for disgusting behavior whether intellectual, emotional, or physical, and whether in private, or the commons. If you cannot accept our cognitive tribes of conservatives as all unified under the natural law regardless of means of expressing that natural law as divine law, as moral utility, as rational practicality, and as scientific necessity, then YOU ARE THE REASON THE RIGHT FAILS. The faithful are the largest problem because they cannot tolerate their dogma as consisting only of wisdom literature (analogy and advice) rather than truth (description and decidability). Yet to win together we must deliver unto god what is god’s (faith we cannot testify to) and deliver unto caesar what is his (truth we can testify to). We cannot unite behind one paradigm of thinking, advocating, and arguing. We can only understand that we share the same instincts, wants, desires, goals for the same biological reasons regardless of their origin, and that we are right to save ourselves, our people, and humanity from disgusting thoughts, feelings and actions whether public or private. Because disgusting thoughts, feelings, and actions are imitated and spread like any disease, and man is more vulnerable to diseases of the mind than he is to those of emotions and body. We argue, and I argue, the faithful are the weakness in our civilization. It was evangelical women who brought about the chain of events that led to our current condition. It was catholic voters that brought about the leftist politicians. It was christians who gave passage to the ‘others’ who are the enemy. It is christians who idolize the enemy and its history instead of themselves and their history. So we must not argue excuses, because each conservative tribe argues with excuses within its paradigm. The only paradigm we need share is that we must eradicate what is disgusting from ourselves, our families, our polities, aour nations, and the world. And whether your god is Jehovah, Sky Father, Odin, Aristotle, the Constitution of natural law or the laws of the universe, none of them will tolerate disgust, and we will not survive without cleansing the world of it, and the universe of it afterward. We all know evil and it is disgusting and we share our disgust of thought, feeling, word, and deed. They are the disease. We are the cure. If that is not a god’s purpose for us then I know no other.

  • RT @NoahRevoy: If you have crazy people in your life you won’t be able to attrac

    RT @NoahRevoy: If you have crazy people in your life you won’t be able to attract sane people into it.

    Making better quality friends start…


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 13:05:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173946076358991873

  • What marks are now unreliable? What makes you think environmental marks are reli

    What marks are now unreliable? What makes you think environmental marks are reliable? I spent some time hunting and they aren’t very reliable. 😉 Man covered tracks early. He lied early by doing so. What problem do you think you can solve with an emphasis on what?


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-16 21:31:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173711127416623106

    Reply addressees: @Semiogogue

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173710626058919936


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Semiogogue

    @curtdoolittle Tells you that the reliability of environmental marks has been central to our survival. We evolved in circumstances in which the vast majority of environmental marks were reliable indicators of fact. And this holds true from mammals to insects. But human marks are now unreliable.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173710626058919936

  • So what? Crawling came first. Scent first. Black and white vision first. As far

    So what? Crawling came first. Scent first. Black and white vision first. As far as I know imitation(body), empathy(emotion), sympathy (mind), communication and physical transformation (tool making) all evolved in parallel because they’re all dependent upon the same faculties.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-16 21:29:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173710469183528960

    Reply addressees: @Semiogogue

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173709402215518209


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Semiogogue

    @curtdoolittle Nope. I’m concerned with marks. Words only matter insofar as they’ve heretofore been considered as the standard against which all other human communciation should be judged. I hold that words are secondary and contingent, and that writing came first.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173709402215518209