Again. If I asked you for a plan for taking over a foreign country, a political party, a religion, a political movement, a major corporation, a minor one, or a local business, by use of information and incentives alone, could you? I can. I do. Do not measure others by your reflection.
Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science
-
Confidence: Don’t Measure Others By Your Reflection
-
Confidence: Don’t Measure Others By Your Reflection
Again. If I asked you for a plan for taking over a foreign country, a political party, a religion, a political movement, a major corporation, a minor one, or a local business, by use of information and incentives alone, could you? I can. I do. Do not measure others by your reflection.
-
Confidence of Liberal vs Conservative Minds (Important)
The Liberal (feminine) mind overestimates its abilities because of social cognitive bias, and insensitivity to non-correspondence. The Conservative (masculine) mind underestimates its ability because of lack of social cognitive bias, and hypersensitivity to non-correspondence.
-
Confidence of Liberal vs Conservative Minds (Important)
The Liberal (feminine) mind overestimates its abilities because of social cognitive bias, and insensitivity to non-correspondence. The Conservative (masculine) mind underestimates its ability because of lack of social cognitive bias, and hypersensitivity to non-correspondence.
-
The Liberal (feminine) mind overestimates its abilities because social cognitive
The Liberal (feminine) mind overestimates its abilities because social cognitive bias, and insensitivity to non-correspondence. The Conservative (masculine) mind underestimates its ability because of lack of social cognitive bias, and hypersensitivity to non-correspondence.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-19 18:42:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174755569888088065
Reply addressees: @RedbeardWrath @TOOEdit
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174754775797293056
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@RedbeardWrath @TOOEdit Again. If I asked you for a plan for taking over a foreign country, a political party, a religion, a political movement, a major corporation, a minor one, or a local business, by use of information and incentives alone, could you? I do. Do not measure others by your reflection.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174754775797293056
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@RedbeardWrath @TOOEdit Again. If I asked you for a plan for taking over a foreign country, a political party, a religion, a political movement, a major corporation, a minor one, or a local business, by use of information and incentives alone, could you? I do. Do not measure others by your reflection.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174754775797293056
-
demand( neoteny, depth and rate of maturity). But you know, we ended the pomo li
… demand( neoteny, depth and rate of maturity). But you know, we ended the pomo lie of nature over nurture in gender, personality, intelligence, and potential last year, and right now , within a year or two we will end the pomo lie of indifference of groups, nations, races.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-19 16:54:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174728481495748610
Reply addressees: @willwilkinson @nytopinion @BetoORourke
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174728024304095234
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@willwilkinson @nytopinion @BetoORourke So no, you are not a ‘liberal’, your just another acolyte of Byzantium, Persia, Mesopotamia, China and Egypt – an ego, a despot making false promise that genders, individuals, groups, classes, nations, and yes, even races, are equal in distribution of class size (ability) and …
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174728024304095234
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@willwilkinson @nytopinion @BetoORourke So no, you are not a ‘liberal’, your just another acolyte of Byzantium, Persia, Mesopotamia, China and Egypt – an ego, a despot making false promise that genders, individuals, groups, classes, nations, and yes, even races, are equal in distribution of class size (ability) and …
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174728024304095234
-
“The enemy of systematizing is empathy.” — Edward Dutton (via brandon cheshire
—“The enemy of systematizing is empathy.” — Edward Dutton
(via brandon cheshire)
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-19 10:03:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174625143831912448
-
“The enemy of systematizing is empathy.” — Edward Dutton (via brandon cheshire
—“The enemy of systematizing is empathy.” — Edward Dutton
(via brandon cheshire)
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-19 06:03:00 UTC
-
The problem is that the female mind (left, consumption), ascendent male mind (li
The problem is that the female mind (left, consumption), ascendent male mind (libertarian, production), and established male mind (conservative, conservation) differ in their moral instincts. Proportionality and equality for the female and Reciprocity and hierarchy for the male.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-18 23:34:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174466649598103552
Reply addressees: @UDepravity @gurugeorgey @Biorealism @charliekirk11 @TuckerCarlson @thespandrell @Steve_Sailer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174457410934706176
IN REPLY TO:
@SealOfTheEnd
@curtdoolittle @gurugeorgey @Biorealism @charliekirk11 @TuckerCarlson @thespandrell @Steve_Sailer Our moral instincts are inborn. Subverting them reliably on a large scale demands great amounts of social control or propaganda.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174457410934706176
-
You’re assuming it’s reason based upon evidence when it’s Just following the her
You’re assuming it’s reason based upon evidence when it’s Just following the herd and echoing the herd. Conservatives share genetic biases: High disgust, lower agreeableness, higher testosterone, meaning more honest in thought and word. We cannot assume others can ‘be’ us.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-18 17:45:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174378847334273026
Reply addressees: @_ThatVoice
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174376023959449600
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174376023959449600