Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • WHY LOSS OF T? Sedentary Living. Not lifting heavy things. Not competing with me

    WHY LOSS OF T?

    Sedentary Living.

    Not lifting heavy things.

    Not competing with men.

    Too much light, tv, monitor, not enough sleep.

    Probably … estrogens everywhere.



    (edit: By light, I didn’t mean sunlight (which is good), I meant, “Not getting enough sleep, because of tv, computer, etc”)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-17 13:42:00 UTC

  • Feb 17, 2020, 2:36 AM

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/16/health/male-sperm-count-problem.htmlUpdated Feb 17, 2020, 2:36 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-17 02:36:00 UTC

  • Yes Eugenics Works. Period. So Do Many Things We Don’t Do

    Yes Eugenics Works. Period. So Do Many Things We Don’t Do. https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/17/yes-eugenics-works-period-so-do-many-things-we-dont-do/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-17 01:44:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229220056501932034

  • Yes Eugenics Works. Period. So Do Many Things We Don’t Do.

    YES EUGENICS WORKS. PERIOD. SO DO MANY THINGS WE DON”T DO.

    —“No he’s not, he’s offering support to eugenics. It’s not scientifically, ethically, or socially valid AT ALL. Go read some bioethics.”—Dr Julie Blommaert @drjulie_b

    Julie you are a typical product of the feminist postmodern pseudoscience movement. (a) Eugenics would work. (b) So would many other things we don’t do. Even genocide works – it’s the most effective historical means of evolutionary competition. We don’t do it. SO STOP LYING. We have lost a full standard deviation of intelligence above the Hajnal Line in the past 150 years due to reversal. We’re just about to cross the line of 97 in the USA, and evidence is that 95 and 93 are cliff effects that are unrecoverable. That’s before personality trait diffs. So go read bio-ethics yourself. Not propaganda. Not marxist, feminist, postmodernist pseudoscience and sophistry. What is the human cost of reversing thousands of years of soft eugenics by taxation and credit expansion in the middle to profit the top and expand the bottom? Economics (in the Beckerian tradition) should be required to get any degree and any pretense of conception of what ‘ethics’ means. People like you are a cancer for mankind.

  • Yes Eugenics Works. Period. So Do Many Things We Don’t Do.

    YES EUGENICS WORKS. PERIOD. SO DO MANY THINGS WE DON”T DO.

    —“No he’s not, he’s offering support to eugenics. It’s not scientifically, ethically, or socially valid AT ALL. Go read some bioethics.”—Dr Julie Blommaert @drjulie_b

    Julie you are a typical product of the feminist postmodern pseudoscience movement. (a) Eugenics would work. (b) So would many other things we don’t do. Even genocide works – it’s the most effective historical means of evolutionary competition. We don’t do it. SO STOP LYING. We have lost a full standard deviation of intelligence above the Hajnal Line in the past 150 years due to reversal. We’re just about to cross the line of 97 in the USA, and evidence is that 95 and 93 are cliff effects that are unrecoverable. That’s before personality trait diffs. So go read bio-ethics yourself. Not propaganda. Not marxist, feminist, postmodernist pseudoscience and sophistry. What is the human cost of reversing thousands of years of soft eugenics by taxation and credit expansion in the middle to profit the top and expand the bottom? Economics (in the Beckerian tradition) should be required to get any degree and any pretense of conception of what ‘ethics’ means. People like you are a cancer for mankind.

  • Are Women the Source Of, or Market For, Academic Pseudoscience and Sophism?

    Are Women the Source Of, or Market For, Academic Pseudoscience and Sophism? https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/17/are-women-the-source-of-or-market-for-academic-pseudoscience-and-sophism/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-17 01:44:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229219926709329920

  • Are Women the Source Of, or Market For, Academic Pseudoscience and Sophism?

    [W]ho produced pseudoscience and sophistry for the academic market? Are women the source of, or market for, academic pseudoscience and sophism? Math: Cantor-Bohr-Einstein, Man: Boas-Freud, Econ: Marx-Mises, Culture: Adorno-Fromm, Philosophy: Derrida, Feminism: Friedan, Neocons: Trotsky-S…-Crystal and Rothbard/Rand are the innovators – but Europeans readily jump on the opportunity for advancement by pseudoscience and sophism.

  • Are Women the Source Of, or Market For, Academic Pseudoscience and Sophism?

    [W]ho produced pseudoscience and sophistry for the academic market? Are women the source of, or market for, academic pseudoscience and sophism? Math: Cantor-Bohr-Einstein, Man: Boas-Freud, Econ: Marx-Mises, Culture: Adorno-Fromm, Philosophy: Derrida, Feminism: Friedan, Neocons: Trotsky-S…-Crystal and Rothbard/Rand are the innovators – but Europeans readily jump on the opportunity for advancement by pseudoscience and sophism.

  • No. Because we (a) know what undesirable traits are, (b) the lower classes are l

    No. Because we (a) know what undesirable traits are, (b) the lower classes are lower because of genetic load (c) we have been practicing soft eugenics since at least 700ad in northern europe (manorialism), and hard (hanging) and it’s the reason for chinese and european success.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-16 21:43:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229159376533032961

    Reply addressees: @EgSophie

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229013979625873410

  • Same position. Dysgenics is far worse than eugenics

    Same position. Dysgenics is far worse than eugenics. https://twitter.com/MartianHoplite/status/1229151129856028677