Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • There is a vast difference between being educated and being knowledgeable. In th

    There is a vast difference between being educated and being knowledgeable. In theory education leads to knowledge in practice that doesn’t appear the case unless on learns formulae for categorization calculation and transformation of states – instead it leads to indoctrination.

    The academy is thee enemy of our people.

    It is a worse enemy than the church.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-22 12:55:00 UTC

  • THE QUALIA OF GEOMETRY IS UNIFORM by Andrew M Gilmour If Dennett built more on c

    THE QUALIA OF GEOMETRY IS UNIFORM

    by Andrew M Gilmour

    If Dennett built more on cog/sci and less on phenomenology. Dennett also made the mistake of using colour for uniformity of qualia as opposed to geometry (ancient Greeks). The qualia of geometry is uniform; the qualia of colour is not. *Uniform across human personal consciousness.

    —-

    CD: Well done. Will add that to our geometry presentation.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-21 11:30:00 UTC

  • DOOLITTLE VS DENNETT ON CONSIOUSNESS —“You know, P language reminds me of a di

    DOOLITTLE VS DENNETT ON CONSIOUSNESS

    —“You know, P language reminds me of a direction I think Danial Dennett was going with how to study consciousness (Phenomenology), but P is more complete. It was in his book “consciousness explained”.”— Adam Jacob Robert Walker

    Yes, well we are all subject to the same information and converging on the same solution. And I’m just the one who put it all together first.

    Probably because I started with ai, programming and economics instead of philosophy and psychology.

    So as the neurological revolution unfolded over the past twenty years I had less of a paradigm shift than the other thinkers.

    And I don’t have pressure to publish. So I just kept working without anchoring myself.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-21 10:36:00 UTC

  • P LOGIC IN RELATIONSHIPS You don’t use P-logic to argue with your wife, girlfrie

    P LOGIC IN RELATIONSHIPS

    You don’t use P-logic to argue with your wife, girlfriend – even if you probably should use it with your daughters. You use P to UNDERSTAND your wife or girlfriend, so that you can ask the right questions and give the right answers.

    The most important of which isn’t to tell her her feelings are wrong, or her desires are wrong, but whether they are possible or not, and whether they would achieve desired ends or not. Women need you to listen while they work through suppressing the emotion and impulse. They need you to support them as they work through those thoughts impulses and emotions so that you relieve them of the burden of doing it alone. And they need you to help them come to a conclusion on their own – just as they help you through your male anger or frustration when it clouds your vision. And they need you to say ‘no’ when it’s your fking job to say ‘these are the limits’ beyond which you are not willing to go – and not apologize for it. Be a man. Give her room to exercise emotional frustration by emotional expression like you exercise emotional frustration by physical expression.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-20 23:15:00 UTC

  • “I can only imagine the fallout from telling a significant other during a heated

    —“I can only imagine the fallout from telling a significant other during a heated discussion that her emotions were simply a response to a perceived change in property.”—Michael Churchill


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-20 19:57:00 UTC

  • Democrats (liberals) are psychotic, solipsistic, and kleptocratic by nature. Onc

    Democrats (liberals) are psychotic, solipsistic, and kleptocratic by nature. Once you grok it’s all genetics, that they’re all cognitively female, and that nothing can be done, there is no possibility for democracy to survive without market pressure on lower class reproduction.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-20 15:17:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1230511769342369792

    Reply addressees: @Libertyworld

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1230498352439025666

  • By Martin Štěpán Emotions are not moral or immoral, they just measure changes in

    By Martin Štěpán

    Emotions are not moral or immoral, they just measure changes in property. At most, you can say they’re bad when they’re measuring incorrectly but that’s not about morality but about the brain working sub-optimally.

    I think what might also be going on is conflation with Christian deadly sins. But these, as far as I know, are judged by actions.

    So, greed can motivate a rational agent to accumulate wealth by engaging in reciprocal exchanges where parasitism and predation are sufficiently dis-incentivized.

    Lust can motivate one deepen connection with his mate and to produce a next generation, especially, again, where the alternatives are sufficiently dis-incentivized.

    Vengeance can lead one to punish what deserves to be punished and thus dis-incentivize the recipient of vengeance from repeating it (or else removing him from the society and the gene-pool) as well as dis-incentivize other from doing the same.

    Self-deception might lead to behave in more moral ways, such as when one deceives himself that there is an afterlife and morality our actions in this life will determine whether it will be pleasurable or painful.

    Empathy can often be extended to people who deserve none or who cannot or wouldn’t reciprocate, enabling parasitism.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-20 14:50:00 UTC

  • “As economic concerns disappear in first world countries, K-select mating patter

    —“As economic concerns disappear in first world countries, K-select mating patterns are increasingly centered on aesthetics — for which height is a solid measure for men. Thus we already see speciation: K-select high-IQ whites with tall attractive children, and then a larger mass of the opposite. Andrew Yang talked about exactly this phenomonon in his campaign.”—Michael Churchill


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-19 16:11:00 UTC

  • CAUSALITY by Brandon Hayes —“The Conflict’s not so much race, but agency, resu

    CAUSALITY

    by Brandon Hayes

    —“The Conflict’s not so much race, but agency, resulting class, class size, and resulting subculture. Race is just a convenient low resolution proxy that obscures the problem.” – Curt Doolittle

    The claim isn’t that it’s a proxy for agency but it’s a proxy for this sequencing of phenomena: “agency, resulting class, class size, and resulting subculture”

    And replacing that higher resolution chain with “race” dilutes the information to be gleaned.

    LESS re-ordering is most expedient. Where tooling and training will do separation and conflict can be avoided.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-19 11:20:00 UTC

  • he is saying that we don’t understand each other, but (supposedly) we need eacho

    he is saying that we don’t understand each other, but (supposedly) we need eachother.

    i have a very different understanding: eugenic vs dysgenic


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-19 03:42:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229974425971437569

    Reply addressees: @TruthRespecter

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229967996883472384