|Shrilling| Counter-Signaling -> Outraging -> Shrilling -> ShriekingShrilling : hbd science-denialism, feminism, postmodernism, marxism, inappropriate theism. shrill (n.) 1a: having or emitting a sharp high-pitched tone or sound 1b: accompanied by sharp high-pitched sounds or cries 2: having a sharp or vivid effect on the senses 3: PIERCING, STRIDENT, INTEMPERATE shrew, shrewish (adj.) “peevish, malignant, clamorous, spiteful, vexatious, turbulent woman” [Johnson] is late 14c., from earlier sense of “spiteful person” (male or female), mid-13c.,late 14c., “wicked, malignant,” from shrew + -ish. Of women, “malignant and scolding,” from 1560s. Related: Shrewishly; shrewishness. scold (n.) mid-12c., “person of ribald speech,” later “person fond of abusive language” (c. 1300), especially a shrewish woman [Johnson defines it as “A clamourous, rude, mean, low, foul-mouthed woman”], from Old Norse skald “poet” (see skald). The sense evolution might reflect the fact that Germanic poets (like their Celtic counterparts) were famously feared for their ability to lampoon and mock (as in skaldskapr “poetry,” also, in Icelandic law books, “libel in verse”).
Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science
-
“Shrilling” (vs Shrill, Shrew, Scold)
|Shrilling| Counter-Signaling -> Outraging -> Shrilling -> ShriekingShrilling : hbd science-denialism, feminism, postmodernism, marxism, inappropriate theism. shrill (n.) 1a: having or emitting a sharp high-pitched tone or sound 1b: accompanied by sharp high-pitched sounds or cries 2: having a sharp or vivid effect on the senses 3: PIERCING, STRIDENT, INTEMPERATE shrew, shrewish (adj.) “peevish, malignant, clamorous, spiteful, vexatious, turbulent woman” [Johnson] is late 14c., from earlier sense of “spiteful person” (male or female), mid-13c.,late 14c., “wicked, malignant,” from shrew + -ish. Of women, “malignant and scolding,” from 1560s. Related: Shrewishly; shrewishness. scold (n.) mid-12c., “person of ribald speech,” later “person fond of abusive language” (c. 1300), especially a shrewish woman [Johnson defines it as “A clamourous, rude, mean, low, foul-mouthed woman”], from Old Norse skald “poet” (see skald). The sense evolution might reflect the fact that Germanic poets (like their Celtic counterparts) were famously feared for their ability to lampoon and mock (as in skaldskapr “poetry,” also, in Icelandic law books, “libel in verse”).
-
Net result is that autists take longer to develop and this is partly because of
Net result is that autists take longer to develop and this is partly because of the simple increase in neurons, as well as the narrowness specialization of the brain.Hence why autism can be ‘cured’ by high investment parenting. I’m not that autistic. But I was definitely lagging.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 15:51:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232332371514576900
Reply addressees: @ubermensch11111 @NISquadron
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232331707493371904
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@ubermensch11111 @NISquadron Now I know that you actually don’t care, because you’re just an infantilist practicing a little GSRRM. But the proof is in the pudding so to speak.I built multiple successful companies, explored the world, and contributed a major innovation in the history of thought. Evidence is.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1232331707493371904
-
Why Women Defect
[I]n simple terms, men find greater persistence, consumptive, productive, and reproductive advantage in loyalty in pursuit of advantage despite conflict whereas women find greater persistence, consumptive, and reproductive advantage in disloyalty and avoidance of conflict. This is why women defect and why all cultures that survive prevent women from defection by limiting political participation.
-
Why Women Defect
[I]n simple terms, men find greater persistence, consumptive, productive, and reproductive advantage in loyalty in pursuit of advantage despite conflict whereas women find greater persistence, consumptive, and reproductive advantage in disloyalty and avoidance of conflict. This is why women defect and why all cultures that survive prevent women from defection by limiting political participation.
-
The Effect of P-Cognates on the normie mind.Updated Feb 25, 2020, 2:05 PM
The Effect of P-Cognates on the normie mind.Updated Feb 25, 2020, 2:05 PM
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 14:05:00 UTC
-
WHAT DOES WHITE MEAN? (possibly controversial post warning)(This post covers gen
WHAT DOES WHITE MEAN?
(possibly controversial post warning)(This post covers genetic differences in neoteny, cognition and personality between geographic groups, and between the sexes. Stop reading if you are concerned you would be offended.)
—“White means….”— Elizabeth Anonymous
Hmmm…. I do science. I leave intellectual dishonesty for others.
We don’t have a term for Genetic, Ethic, Europeans other than ‘White’. But “White”, meaning Ancestral Ethnic European, is easily genetically determinable. In general, at least six generations are necessary to launder ethnic outbreeding. Even, by six generations someone will still express certain dominant traits despite constraining breeding within the group. And it is still easy to determine the difference between a full Scandinavian and the same generation with an Iberian ancestor.
Whites are the remains of the post-glacial maximum peoples, plus the early neolithic farmers, who were conquered, largely genocided and replaced by the ie’s. We are the most genetically homogenous people outside of Han-Korean-Japanese. The only open question is whether we include the remaining pre-ie Anatolian, early neolithic farmer populations of the Balkans, Greece, Southern Italy, and Sardinia in the classification ‘white’ out of cultural affinity under Christianity, or we limit ourselves to genetics using the european branch of the IE expansion: Itals (south), Germanics, Scandinavians, Baltics, Slavs, and Finnics. The rest of the Caucasians descend from the Iranic branch of the IE’s, and anatolians (Hittites), Caucasians (if they existed), and those that integrated into the Semitic peoples – are all lost to us. There were only a few post-glacial maximum west eurasian peoples, and the turks of the northern far east, are the only peoples of the post-glacial that are not indo europeans.
Science is science. Women fear conflict. Women disapprove rather than accept an undesirable but true statement. Women will deny a truth to avoid conflict. Women will advance a falsehood to eschew conflict. While the male vs female distribution of personality Traits and Facets overlaps, the difference between the sexual (gender) relative homogeneity of traits, and the relative heterogeneity of Facets under those traits, is (a) agreeableness, (c) dominance expression, and this results in the (to females) annoying male habit of stating the truth despite the undesirability of it. It also accounts for the approximately 20% improvement in male detection of general trait expression and symmetric improvement in female detection of individual trait expression. In other words, males are more often correct in the ascertainment of empirically correct stereotypes than females, both at the perceptual-cognitive level and at the agreeability level. While women are equally superior at individual emotional empathy and incentive-sympathy.
Net net of the science as it sits: Neoteny slows maturity and buys agency (neural formation) at the cost of emotional instability (creativity, neuroticism). This explains the high emotional instability of european women, and the nearly 1/3 of european women that experience psychological issues when not working in close association with other women to limit them. East asians are the most neotenous by far, europeans less so, africans and afro-asiatics lees so. This is why east asians, then europeans, then afrio-asiatics (semitic peoples), the africans have increasing rates of maturity at decreasing agency and verbal ability. Europeans (a) have not over-neotenized like the east asians nor under neotenized like the africans, and at the same time we have practiced cold weather eugenics for thousands of years. So between our neotenic development, our least-clannish(racist) temperament, our balance of verbal and spatial abilities, and our development of sovereignty (what we mistakenly call individualism) and the culture that resulted from it, including tripartism (markets between miltiary-judicial, producers-philosophers, and priests-theologians, we developed reason, empiricism, science, technology and medicine faster than all other peoples in the world combined.
Ergo, unfortunately, it’s true that at last working class and upward whites are genetically and culturally superior in those ways necessary for the production of advanced and rapidly advancing civilization. And demand by women and immigrants to revert our civilization to primitive, reality-denying, maladaptive, authoritarian, non-market civilization, just proves that (a) these other peoples are unable to integrate in our civilization because they cannot compete in it, (b) our women have defected against our civilization out of fear of conflict and are assisting the destruction of our civilization – just as women and slaves undermined and brought down the roman empire using Christianity from within.
So christianity in the ancient world with the false promise of life after death, and promise of freedom from nature’s competition by marxism, socialism, postmodernism, feminism, human-bio-diversity-denialism, and ‘silencing the truth’ in the modern world to destroy western civlization yet again.
It’s women that need to look in the mirror. Not men.
We have the courage to face the man in the mirror.
Do you have the courage to face the woman in the mirror?
That is the only test of equality of agency that matters.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-23 15:03:00 UTC
-
In simple terms, men find greater persistence, consumptive, productive, and repr
In simple terms, men find greater persistence, consumptive, productive, and reproductive advantage in loyalty in pursuit of advantage despite conflict whereas women find greater persistence, consumptive, and reproductive advantage in disloyalty and avoidance of conflict. This is why women defect and why all cultures that survive prevent women from defection by limiting political participation.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-23 13:24:00 UTC
-
“SHRILLING” (VS SHRILL, SHREW, SCOLD) |Shrilling| Counter-Signaling -> Outraging
“SHRILLING” (VS SHRILL, SHREW, SCOLD)
|Shrilling| Counter-Signaling -> Outraging -> Shrilling -> Shrieking
Shrilling : hbd science-denialism, feminism, postmodernism, marxism, inappropriate theism.
shrill
1a: having or emitting a sharp high-pitched tone or sound
1b: accompanied by sharp high-pitched sounds or cries
2: having a sharp or vivid effect on the senses
3: PIERCING, STRIDENT, INTEMPERATE
shrew, shrewish (adj.)
“peevish, malignant, clamorous, spiteful, vexatious, turbulent woman” [Johnson] is late 14c., from earlier sense of “spiteful person” (male or female), mid-13c.,late 14c., “wicked, malignant,” from shrew + -ish. Of women, “malignant and scolding,” from 1560s. Related: Shrewishly; shrewishness.
scold (n.)
mid-12c., “person of ribald speech,” later “person fond of abusive language” (c. 1300), especially a shrewish woman [Johnson defines it as “A clamourous, rude, mean, low, foul-mouthed woman”], from Old Norse skald “poet” (see skald). The sense evolution might reflect the fact that Germanic poets (like their Celtic counterparts) were famously feared for their ability to lampoon and mock (as in skaldskapr “poetry,” also, in Icelandic law books, “libel in verse”).
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-23 10:15:00 UTC
-
(Nurses and stewardesses seem to have a high female quotient but low crazy quoti
(Nurses and stewardesses seem to have a high female quotient but low crazy quotient, for the same reason mothers with many children have lower crazy quotients: survival. lol )
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-23 08:18:00 UTC