Category: Evolutionary Computation and Systems

  • P-LOGIC 1) Everyone acts to acquire. Life is an expensive means of defeating ent

    P-LOGIC

    1) Everyone acts to acquire. Life is an expensive means of defeating entropy. Acting improves acquisition – at additional cost. Memory improves acquisition – at additional cost. reason improves acquisition – at additional cost. cooperation improves acquisition – at additional cost.

    2) We all act in furtherance of our reproductive strategy. Female (Consume), Neutral(Exchange), and Male (Capitalize)

    3) Male and Female reproductive strategies are in conflict. The female seeks to breed impulsively where it benefits her lineage, and then force the cost of her offspring on the tribe, and to further her offspring regardless of merit. The male seeks to breed impulsively wherever it does not harm his lineage, and to create a tribe capable of resisting conquest by other males – and as such males act meritocratic-ally. Men are political and divided into kin and non-kin – the universe is male. For women, men are marginally indifferent herdsmen of women. Women live in a world of women, and both men and the universe are alien.

    4) Humans compete for status because status provides discounts on opportunities to acquire – especially mates and allies in cooperation. We can identify at least three horizontal axes of class division: biological (reproductive desirability), social (status desirability), economic (wealth desirability) – as well as their undesirable opposites.

    5) There exist only three means of coercing other humans to cooperate with on one means or end vs cooperate with others on different means or ends. These three means of coercion can be used to construct three vertical axes of class specialization: coercion by force(conservatism/masculine), coercion by gossip(progressivism/feminine), coercion by remuneration (libertarianism / neutral masculine). Human elites are formed by those who specialize in one or more of these means of coercion. (gossip: public intellectuals and priests. force: military and political. exchange: voluntary organizations, including the voluntary organization of production.

    6) Language is purely justification negotiation in furtherance of our acquisition by these three means. ergo: All ‘belief’ is justification to the self and others in furtherance of acquisition. It is meaningless. Statements of justification only provide us with information necessary to deduce what it is that we wish to acquire.

    7) Cooperation is a disproportionately more productive means of acquisition than individual production.

    8) We seek discounts on our acquisitions. Some of these discounts are productive and moral and encourage cooperation, and some of them are unproductive and immoral, discourage cooperation, and invite retaliation.

    9) The only moral acquisition is one in which one either homesteads something new or obtains it by productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange, where external transfers are limited to the same criteria.

    10) Aristotle’s ‘golden mean’ is an inarticulate primitive expression of the supply-demand curve. All human acquisition takes place within the pressures of supply and demand. As such all explanations of human action must be produced using supply and demand curves: the golden mean.

    11) All human considerations and consequent actions take place in high causal density, choices determined by means of opportunity costs, and any analysis requires we show the choices that an individual or group is considering. (Full Accounting).

    12) We cooperate and coerce in large numbers, as classes with common reproductive interests to using narratives at every scale. Science and moral law are the only means of resolving conflicts between these narratives. Propertarian analysis provides means of amoral analysis, argument and decidability between these loaded, framed, and obscured arguments.

    13) Groups evolve evolutionary strategies and supporting narratives. While none of these strategies by any given group is fully moral, it is still true that we can compare strategies as more and less objectively moral. We can measure the differences in objective morality by the degree of suppression of free riding in that given society.

    14) In all political matters, ultimate decidability is provided by a bias to suicidal, proletarian and dysgenic, or competitive, aristocratic and eugenic reproduction. The myth of equality (the Christian mythos) was let loose by the middle-class takeover of the aristocratic governments, and the eventual enfranchisement of women whose reproductive strategy under industrial production is dysgenic – reversing 7,000 years of indo european genetic pacification (eugenic evolution). This is a very unpleasant and impolitic topic. But it is where we find decidability.

    THE SIMPLE METHOD: INCENTIVES AS ACQUISITION

    1) take any circumstance in which someone is attempting to persuade someone else.

    2) identify the reproductive strategy of the speaker (largely by gender, class, and coercive technique.)

    3) identify the property-in-toto that the speaker is attempting to acquire.

    4) determine if his or her method is advocating a moral transfer(productive) or an immoral transfer (parasitism).

    5) Determine which discounts (thefts) he or she is attempting to engage in, or which premiums (payments) he or she is offering in exchange.

    6) State the user’s request in amoral propertarian terms free of loading, framing, or overloading. In other words, make a purely logical argument free of sentimental loading.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-20 15:41:00 UTC

  • Competition between Competition and Cooperation functions as a system of computa

    Competition between Competition and Cooperation functions as a system of computation. The problem with cooperation is that natural selection disfavors intelligence and intelligence favors competition. But the only way to calculate the unknown is competition.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-13 13:25:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1150033614769393666

    Reply addressees: @natjdyer

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1150008834209058817


    IN REPLY TO:

    @natjdyer

    As the article says, “Modern evolutionary science shows that cooperation is just as important in nature as competition.” This is the crux. That idea has a pedigree and a history which needs to be unearthed.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1150008834209058817

  • EXAMPLE: Power > Road > Rail > Raids > Cash Depletion things are only complicate

    EXAMPLE: Power > Road > Rail > Raids > Cash Depletion
    things are only complicate when you dont know the points of failure.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-05-30 01:43:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1133911760824610816

  • 3) Same for machine learning. Search(discover opportunity), Predict, Reinforce w

    3) Same for machine learning. Search(discover opportunity), Predict, Reinforce what survives, and Prune(die off). Nature can’t predict. It uses numbers. Advanced life can’t predict. It Mates. Sentients can predict. Pruning neurons is cheaper. Same for ML/AI. Econ in everything.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-05-25 23:51:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1132434001749250048

    Reply addressees: @aulderic

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1129804974903291904


    IN REPLY TO:

    @ericauld

    A similar question is why sexual reproduction has outperformed asexual reproduction. (This has connections to machine learning.) https://t.co/UOJpGsAXHs

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1129804974903291904

  • 2) So test is of the field (colony)of a life form not the individuals. Bacteria

    2) So test is of the field (colony)of a life form not the individuals. Bacteria split (they are cheap) and advanced life forms mate(expensive). greater variation in calculation of opportunity while preserving opportunity for genetic correction.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-05-25 23:50:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1132433769686818816

    Reply addressees: @aulderic

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1129804974903291904


    IN REPLY TO:

    @ericauld

    A similar question is why sexual reproduction has outperformed asexual reproduction. (This has connections to machine learning.) https://t.co/UOJpGsAXHs

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1129804974903291904

  • 1) Fitness as you describe it provides stasis rather than continual adaptation.

    1) Fitness as you describe it provides stasis rather than continual adaptation. In other words, it is more useful for an organism to continuously express variation (limit testing), in search of new niches than it is to create a vulnerability to shocks by stasis.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-05-25 23:42:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1132431665068957697

    Reply addressees: @aulderic

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1129804974903291904


    IN REPLY TO:

    @ericauld

    A similar question is why sexual reproduction has outperformed asexual reproduction. (This has connections to machine learning.) https://t.co/UOJpGsAXHs

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1129804974903291904

  • (All) True except that the ‘algorithm’ that these fascinating creatures demonstr

    (All) True except that the ‘algorithm’ that these fascinating creatures demonstrate is always terribly simple. In the case of the spider, vibration (tension) to them, like markers to an ant, like sight to a human. ( I studied ducks. Very few behaviors. )


    Source date (UTC): 2019-05-11 23:59:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1127362626739109889

    Reply addressees: @SteveStuWill

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1126614730024480768


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1126614730024480768

  • REFLEXIVITY OR CONTINUOUS RECURSION?

    REFLEXIVITY OR CONTINUOUS RECURSION?


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-26 02:06:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1100215447633448960

  • 6) … computation, valuation, and action (or prohibiting, computation, valuatio

    6) … computation, valuation, and action (or prohibiting, computation, valuation, and action) is not something open to dispute. Nor is the great leap forward provided by the singularity of development of language in the division of sense, perception, memory, and cognition.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-21 12:11:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1076087757984931840

    Reply addressees: @TrueDilTom @justecar @Imperius__13 @JohnMarkSays @torinmccabe @DataDistribute @MahmoudZaini @Dick71224996

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1075890809357123592


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @TrueDilTom @justecar @Imperius__13 @JohnMarkSays @torinmccabe @DataDistribute @MahmoudZaini @Dick71224996 It’s bad enough we have left wing liars taking advantage of women and the underclass, but it’s hard to understand why there are those of you who want to take advantage of lost, underachieving young man and throw them in the degenerative maelstrom with the women and fools.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1075890809357123592


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @TrueDilTom @justecar @Imperius__13 @JohnMarkSays @torinmccabe @DataDistribute @MahmoudZaini @Dick71224996 It’s bad enough we have left wing liars taking advantage of women and the underclass, but it’s hard to understand why there are those of you who want to take advantage of lost, underachieving young man and throw them in the degenerative maelstrom with the women and fools.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1075890809357123592

  • We Spin Off People

    What you notice is that we spin off people who explore their own niches, and meanwhile a core of us keep going deeper and deeper.