It’s a perfect repetition of Rome and romans thought like you did, but they didn’t understand what Hayek did: that myths, traditions, norms, institutions are calculating software not common sense, and that they are very fragile. Mass migration always destroys every civilization.
Reply addressees: @lazzarolupo @AHelleneAuthor @jamesfoxhiggins @realDaveReilly @StefanMolyneux @EMichaelJones1 @NoahRevoy @JohnMarkSays @DackStevon @BrianCraigLawr1 @RealJamesWoods
Category: Evolutionary Computation and Systems
-
It’s a perfect repetition of Rome and romans thought like you did, but they didn
-
It’s a perfect repetition of Rome and romans thought like you did, but they didn
It’s a perfect repetition of Rome and romans thought like you did, but they didn’t understand what Hayek did: that myths, traditions, norms, institutions are calculating software not common sense, and that they are very fragile. Mass migration always destroys every civilization.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-10 13:52:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1270715529494360064
Reply addressees: @lazzarolupo @AHelleneAuthor @jamesfoxhiggins @realDaveReilly @StefanMolyneux @EMichaelJones1 @NoahRevoy @JohnMarkSays @DackStevon @BrianCraigLawr1 @RealJamesWoods
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1270715195309129728
-
I think the truth is less pleasant. We are speciating by our ability to us techn
I think the truth is less pleasant. We are speciating by our ability to us technology, just as we have speciated by our ability to make tools, use speech, and develop complex divisions of labor. The only solution is separation and restoration of speciation, by choice or by war.
Reply addressees: @bot3685 -
I think the truth is less pleasant. We are speciating by our ability to us techn
I think the truth is less pleasant. We are speciating by our ability to us technology, just as we have speciated by our ability to make tools, use speech, and develop complex divisions of labor. The only solution is separation and restoration of speciation, by choice or by war.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-07 16:11:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1269663173705183232
Reply addressees: @bot3685
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1269661829967441920
-
And how is that collapse, failure, or anything negative whatsoever? Those are fe
And how is that collapse, failure, or anything negative whatsoever? Those are features and benefits, not failures.
Are you (oddly) trying to solve for steady-state? (devolution)
Reply addressees: @Elbanna201 -
And how is that collapse, failure, or anything negative whatsoever? Those are fe
And how is that collapse, failure, or anything negative whatsoever? Those are features and benefits, not failures.
Are you (oddly) trying to solve for steady-state? (devolution)
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-05 11:34:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1268868767532138496
Reply addressees: @Elbanna201
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1268867052170883074
-
7) … catastrophic failures. Personal Depressions, Economic Depression, Politic
7) … catastrophic failures. Personal Depressions, Economic Depression, Political Conflicts, and Social Conflict, and the resulting (Current) civil wars and wars.
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-13 14:46:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1260582264863416322
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1260582263407947780
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
6) Meaning that it is very costly to reorganize a neural, economic, political and social economy in response to change, and so we resist adaptation to change. Hence personal, economic, political, social, anchoring. Hence economic, politica, social ‘corrections’ are limited to …
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1260582263407947780
-
6) Meaning that it is very costly to reorganize a neural, economic, political an
6) Meaning that it is very costly to reorganize a neural, economic, political and social economy in response to change, and so we resist adaptation to change. Hence personal, economic, political, social, anchoring. Hence economic, politica, social ‘corrections’ are limited to …
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-13 14:46:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1260582263407947780
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1260582262233542656
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
5) In other words, brains adapt to the senses they’re connected to and coherence between sense perception as it’s funneled into an integrated model creates a continuous organization of the brain. So neural economies function as political economies. And we have the same problems.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1260582262233542656
-
4) But Adversarialism(competition) is the only way for systems to continuously e
4) But Adversarialism(competition) is the only way for systems to continuously evolve without requiring a priori knowledge. As such our brains evolve consciousness through competitive trial and error with consistency of sets of neural predictions between states as the ‘reward’.
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-13 14:46:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1260582260559970304
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1260582259570216961
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
3) The competition between hemispheres and consolidation of competition for attention, and producing two competitors for attention. The result is a loss of introspection into causation. We don’t think of the brain as a market competition (adversarialism) rather than calculation.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1260582259570216961
-
Yes. You need three bodies in any competition to maintain an equilibrium. This a
Yes. You need three bodies in any competition to maintain an equilibrium. This allows defectors to shift alliances so that the equilibrium is maintained. Otherwise a monopoly would ensue and one would eliminate the other. So: two sexes are the optimum, three strategies are too.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-14 15:32:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250084431261556739
Reply addressees: @jim_rutt @LLaddon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250083651288694786