Category: Epistemology and Method

  • WHAT IS PROPERTARIANISM? It’s a language for the value neutral analysis of socia

    WHAT IS PROPERTARIANISM?

    It’s a language for the value neutral analysis of social activity.

    I never know which way to say it:

    1) Testimonialism’s Propertarian Ethics

    2) Propertarianism’s Testimonial Truth.

    3) Natural Law’s Market Government.

    These things are all about the same. Roman convinced me to stick with Propertarianism becuase I’d invested in the brand name. But in practice “Propertarianism” consists of

    1) Testimonial Truth,

    2) Propertarian Ethics

    3) Market Government

    4) Natural Law as a Group Evolutionary Strategy


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-28 05:16:00 UTC

  • IS TRUTH? (Introduction to Propertarianism’s Testimonial Truth)

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/06/28/a-short-course-on-propertarianisms-testimonial-truth/WHAT IS TRUTH?

    (Introduction to Propertarianism’s Testimonial Truth)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-28 05:12:00 UTC

  • WE SOLVED SOCIAL SCIENCE #NewRight Aristotle and Plato : Natural Law (vision but

    WE SOLVED SOCIAL SCIENCE

    #NewRight

    Aristotle and Plato : Natural Law

    (vision but failure)

    Augustine and The Church.

    (incremental improvement – but failure)

    Hobbes, Locke, Smith and Hume

    (incremental improvement but bordering on science)

    Menger (Austrian/Galacian Science – German Rational tradition) 1840

    Mises (Jewish/Galacian pseudoscience – jewish legal tradition) 1881

    Hayek (German/Anglo Empirical – Adopted Anglo legal tradition) 1899

    (failure again, with only hayek discovering that it is law not economics that produces social science)

    Rothbard (Jewish/Russian Justification -Jewish legal tradition)1926

    Hoppe (German Rational – Continental legal tradition), 1949

    Doolittle (Anglo Empirical – Anglo Saxon legal tradition). 1959

    (success)

    Rothbard, Doolittle, and Hoppe. We solved social science in three generations.

    The only social science possible is the common law: the discovery of means of violating the requirement for productive, fully informed, voluntary transfer, limited to positive externalities of the same. Economics is the study of information and incentives to cooperate.

    The basis of natural law is disproportionate value of cooperation.

    The language of natural law is economic, not moral.

    It was the failure of prior generations to rely upon financial and economic language rather than religious and moral language that prevented the solution to the problem of the social sciences. Morality is economic. It must be. Since we are part of the physical universe.

    This is where Hayek ended up. He was right. But even he could not escape his language. And even he did not know how to solve the problem of truth.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-28 04:05:00 UTC

  • Rothbard (Jewish Justificationary), Hoppe (German Rational), Doolittle (Anglo Em

    Rothbard (Jewish Justificationary), Hoppe (German Rational), Doolittle (Anglo Empirical). We solved social science in three generations. #NewRight


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-28 03:25:00 UTC

  • Anyone relying upon principles rather than full sentences is trying to lie, chea

    Anyone relying upon principles rather than full sentences is trying to lie, cheat, and steal. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-27 09:24:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/714020253454503936

    Reply addressees: @BobDude15

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/714020012181204996


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/714020012181204996

  • In religion, philosophy, legislation, and speculation, intentions are merely jus

    In religion, philosophy, legislation, and speculation, intentions are merely justifications or deceits. It does not matter what one said, what a scripture says, what a law says, or what an investor pays for.

    All that matters is the outcome.

    If practice of your religion, philosophy, legislation, and speculation lead to sustainable intergenerational prosperity then it is true. otherwise it is false. There is no other test of religion, philosophy, legislation and speculation.

    This is very hard for humans to accept.

    But it is science.

    We do not describe imaginations.

    We describe reality.

    Because all else is error deceit and fraud.

    NO MORE LIES


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-26 06:36:00 UTC

  • ДЛЯ моих новых друзей Я пишу пишу в аналитической философии под названием Proper

    ДЛЯ моих новых друзей

    Я пишу пишу в аналитической философии под названием Propertarianism. Целью данного языка является создание свободной от ценностей (нейтральный) инструмент для общения концептуальных, поведенческих, этических, моральных, социальных, правовых, политических, экономических, и группа конкурентных стратегий.

    Другими словами Propertarianism является формальным языком социальной науки.

    Цель этого языка заключается как предотвратить большие политические ошибки, ложь и обманы, и, чтобы помочь нам понять наши чувства и идеи в научном плане.

    Когда пишу здесь, я очень часто говорят вещи, которые являются истинными, но мы не хотим, чтобы быть правдой. Причина заключается в том, что я хочу, чтобы исправить ошибки, ложь и обманы в озарений – все они, в каждой культуре, которая была преобразована просветления (науки).

    Моя цель LIBERTY

    Под «свободой» я имею в виду «выбор». Но выбор зависит от манеры, этики, морали и достоинства. Не выбор зависит от принятия от других.

    Мое решение ПРАВИТЕЛЬСТВО РЫНОК

    Я против мажоритарного демократии. Но в пользу демократического производства обычных товаров и услуг – где граждане голосуют за достоянию, что они хотят, а не для коррумпированных политиков. Причины слишком сложны для этого поста. Но это не эмоциональный, но научная причина.

    НО ДЛЯ ПРАВИТЕЛЬСТВА РЫНКА НАМ НУЖНА ИСПЫТАНИЯ

    правдивости в области социальных наук

    Проблема в создании правительства, которое является честным, что мы не знаем, как проверить, если законы и законодательство были «истинно» и, следовательно, “научное”, и, следовательно, объективно этическим и моральным. Я произвел этот тест правдивости. Этот тест расширяет научный метод в социальных науках -И объединяет биологию, философию, мораль и право в единый логический метод. Этот метод называется «свидетельство истиной». И философия использования этого метода называется “testimonialism”. Слово для дачи показаний означает, что вы сделали экспертизу, чтобы убедиться, что вы говорили искренне (а не только честно), и что вы гарантия (гарантия), что вы сделали это усердие.

    Когда вы читаете или слышите мою критику – IT “S ВСЕГДА ПРОДЕМОНСТРИРУЙТЕ эти идеи.

    Все мои аргументы, так или иначе связаны с неспособностью просветления и неудач большинства демократии.

    Так что если я соблазняет вас Обратите внимание, что моя цель ОБИДЕТЬ ВАШ интуиций так что вы можете видеть возможность совсем другой мир.

    Тот, где правительства не могут участвовать в коррупции и обмана. Один, в котором мы производим общую собственность без представительных политических деятелей, открытых для коррупции.

    Я предпочитаю Критиковать OURSEVES. Причина, почему мы охотятся злые люди ЭТО ЧЕЛОВЕК В ЗЕРКАЛЕ НЕ завалили.

    С уважением

    Kypt Дулитл


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-26 06:23:00 UTC

  • FOR MY NEW FRIENDS. THIS IS WHAT I DO. The subject of my writing is an analytic

    FOR MY NEW FRIENDS. THIS IS WHAT I DO.

    The subject of my writing is an analytic philosophy called Propertarianism, a tool for creating a value-free language for communicating conceptual, behavioral, moral, social, legal, political, economic, and group competitive strategies. In other words, Propertarianism is a formal language of social science.

    The purpose of this language is to both prevent the great political errors, lies, and deceptions, and to help us understand our feelings and ideas in scientific terms.

    Propertarianism is a way to say things which are true, but that many do not wish to be true. Every culture that has been transformed by an enlightenment (science) embodying errors, lies and deceptions that I want to correct.

    MY GOAL IS LIBERTY

    By ‘liberty’ I mean ‘choice’ — choice dependent upon manners, ethics, morals, and merit. Not choice dependent upon taking from others.

    MY SOLUTION IS MARKET GOVERNMENT

    I am against MAJORITARIAN democracy. But in favor of democratic production of common goods and services – where citizens vote for the commons that they want, not for corrupt politicians. The reasons are too complex for this post. But it is not an emotional, but scientific reason.

    MARKET GOVERNMENT NEEDS TESTS OF TRUTHFULNESS IN SOCIAL SCIENCES

    The problem in creating government that is honest is that we did not know how to test if laws and legislation were ‘true’ and therefore ‘scientific’, and therefore objectively ethical and moral. I produced this test of truthfulness. This test expands the scientific method into the social sciences -and unites biology, philosophy, morality and law into a single logical method. This method is called ‘testimonial truth’. And the philosophy of using this method is called ‘testimonialism’. The word to testify means that you have done diligence to ensure that you have spoken truthfully (not just honestly), and that you warranty (guarantee) that you have done that diligence.

    DEMONSTRATION OF THESE IDEAS

    All of my arguments demonstrate the failure of the enlightenment and the failures of majority democracy.

    IF I OFFEND YOU PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT IT IS MY PURPOSE TO OFFEND YOUR INTUITIONS SO THAT YOU CAN SEE THE POSSIBILITY OF A VERY DIFFERENT WORLD.

    A world where governments are unable to engage in corruption and deceit. One in which we produce common property without representative politicians open to corruption.

    WE NEED TO CRITICIZE OURSELVES. THE REASON WE ARE PREYED UPON BY EVIL PEOPLE IS THE PERSON IN THE MIRROR HAS NOT STOPPED THEM.

    Sincerely

    Curt Doolittle

    (edited by D Frank Robinson )

    ————————————-original prior to edits————–

    FOR MY NEW FRIENDS

    I write write in an analytic philosophy called Propertarianism. The purpose of this language is to create a value-free (neutral) tool for communicating conceptual, behavioral, ethical, moral, social, legal, political, economic, and group competitive strategies.

    In other words Propertarianism is a formal language of social science.

    The purpose of this language is to both prevent the great political errors, lies, and deceptions, and to help us understand our feelings and ideas in scientific terms.

    When write here I very often say things that are true, but that we do not wish to be true. The reason is that I want to correct the errors, lies, and deceptions of the enlightenments – all of them, in every culture that has been transformed by an enlightenment (science).

    MY GOAL IS LIBERTY

    By ‘liberty’ I mean ‘choice’. But choice dependent upon manners, ethics, morals, and merit. Not choice dependent upon taking from others.

    MY SOLUTION IS MARKET GOVERNMENT

    I am against MAJORITY democracy. But in favor of Democratic production of common goods and services – where citizens vote for the commons that they want, not for corrupt politicians. The reasons are too complex for this post. But it is not an emotional, but scientific reason.

    BUT FOR MARKET GOVERNMENT WE NEED TESTS OF TRUTHFULNESS IN SOCIAL SCIENCES

    The problem in creating government that is honest is that we did not know how to test if laws and legislation were ‘true’ and therefore ‘scientific’, and therefore objectively ethical and moral. I produced this test of truthfulness. This test expands the scientific method into the social sciences -and unites biology, philosophy, morality and law into a single logical method. This method is called ‘testimonial truth’. And the philosophy of using this method is called ‘testimonialism’. The word to testify means that you have done diligence to ensure that you have spoken truthfully (not just honestly), and that you warranty (guarantee) that you have done that diligence.

    WHEN YOU READ OR HEAR MY CRITICISMS – IT”S ALWAYS TO DEMONSTRATE THESE IDEAS.

    All of my arguments are somehow connected with the failure of the enlightenment and the failures of majority democracy.

    SO IF I OFFEND YOU PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT IT IS MY PURPOSE TO OFFEND YOUR INTUITIONS SO THAT YOU CAN SEE THE POSSIBILITY OF A VERY DIFFERENT WORLD.

    One where governments are unable to engage in corruption and deceit. One in which we produce common property without representative politicians open to corruption.

    I PREFER TO CRITICiZE OURSEVES. THE REASON WE ARE PREYED UPON BY EVIL PEOPLE IS THE PERSON IN THE MIRROR HAS NOT STOPPED THEM.

    Sincerely

    Curt Doolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-26 06:20:00 UTC

  • Philosophy is largely a subject about that which we cannot directly experience i

    Philosophy is largely a subject about that which we cannot directly experience in human nature, usually at scale.

    Finance like philosophy is a subject we cannot directly experience, but gives us facts about human nature at scale.

    There is a reason programmers and finance people think somewhat differently from engineers and physicists. Their subject is the mind of man, not the limits of the material universe.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-26 05:52:00 UTC

  • if it can’t be compared between states it can’t be decidable. in other words it’

    if it can’t be compared between states it can’t be decidable. in other words it’s meaningless. The general idea = “I don’t know”.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-24 13:49:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712999663947882496

    Reply addressees: @wjfrisby

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712997575645904897


    IN REPLY TO:

    @wjfrisby

    @curtdoolittle The fact that one can be quantified more precisely doesn’t refute the general idea, though, surely?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712997575645904897